This thread is killed. Tresspassers will be removed.
Wietse
On 6/6/2011 9:36 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Stan Hoeppner:
>>> On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>>>
My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
well worth what t
Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
well worth what they charge.
Conversely to do it inhouse I would recommend tearing
On 6/5/2011 8:36 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>>
>>> My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
>>> not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
>>> well worth what they charge.
>>>
>>> Conversely
Stan Hoeppner:
> On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
> > My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
> > not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
> > well worth what they charge.
> >
> > Conversely to do it inhouse I would recommend tearing
Am 05.06.2011 14:30, schrieb Jerry:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 05:52:53 -0500
> Stan Hoeppner articulated:
>> +1
>>
>> Outsource the sending of these shareholder notifications to a
>> reputable bulk mailer. Stating you are running an EOL OS and EOL
>> Postfix tells us you are not up to the task of s
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 05:52:53 -0500
Stan Hoeppner articulated:
> On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
> > My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It
> > will not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can
> > be well worth what they charge.
> >
> > Convers
On 6/4/2011 6:25 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> My recommendation to the OP is to consider outsourcing this. It will
> not cost that much, and a reputable email service provider can be
> well worth what they charge.
>
> Conversely to do it inhouse I would recommend tearing it all down and
> starting o
Le 04/06/2011 23:37, mouss a écrit :
Le 04/06/2011 07:09, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
Hello
1 - configure your DNS SPF record
personal opinion: I recommend against:
my experience with hotmail is as follows:
- I've added an spf record. cool it works
- i had to move the server to another IP. I up
Le 04/06/2011 07:09, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
> Hello
>
> 1 - configure your DNS SPF record
personal opinion: I recommend against:
my experience with hotmail is as follows:
- I've added an spf record. cool it works
- i had to move the server to another IP. I updated the spf record.
doesn't work (y
Le 04/06/2011 13:25, /dev/rob0 a écrit :
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:14:42AM +0200, mouss wrote:
>> Le 04/06/2011 08:43, Goutam Baul a ecrit :
>>> 2) Can you indicate some reliable website to get the dkim-milter
>>> package for my RHEL 3.8?
>>
>> no idea.
>> PS. isn't 3.8 way too outdated?
>
> R
Am 04.06.2011 20:08, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:08:10AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> smtp_destination_recipient_limit= 15
>> smtp_initial_destination_concurrency= 5
>> smtp_destination_concurrency_limit = 5
>> sm
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:08:10AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> smtp_destination_recipient_limit= 15
> smtp_initial_destination_concurrency= 5
> smtp_destination_concurrency_limit = 5
> smtp_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit= 5
>
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:14:42AM +0200, mouss wrote:
> Le 04/06/2011 08:43, Goutam Baul a ecrit :
> > 2) Can you indicate some reliable website to get the dkim-milter
> > package for my RHEL 3.8?
>
> no idea.
> PS. isn't 3.8 way too outdated?
RHEL, IIUC, has EOL'ed 4.5 or thereabouts. Postfix
Le 04/06/2011 08:43, Goutam Baul a écrit :
> Dear Frank,
>
> Thanks a lot for responding. I am now reading through the net and trying to
> implement things as suggested. Just a few queries:
>
> 1) As I am interested in sending bulk mails, I am contemplating modification
>
you main-systems gets
a) your php-script can send burst
b) the webserver will queue
c) the queue on you main server will not get filled
consider a valid ptr/spf-entry for you webserver and
do not use "relay_host", so it will send the bulk-mails
by itself (the settings below are from o
Am 04.06.2011 10:45, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 04.06.2011 06:03, schrieb Goutam Baul:
>> Dear List,
>>
>>
>>
>> We are running our mailing system using Postfix
>> (postfix-2.0.16-14.RHEL3). We need to send communications to our
>> shareholders (around 15000 of them) using the mailing system
Am 04.06.2011 06:03, schrieb Goutam Baul:
> Dear List,
>
>
>
> We are running our mailing system using Postfix
> (postfix-2.0.16-14.RHEL3). We need to send communications to our
> shareholders (around 15000 of them) using the mailing system. If we
> simply send the mails using things like phpma
Le 04/06/2011 08:43, Goutam Baul a écrit :
Dear Frank,
Thanks a lot for responding. I am now reading through the net and trying to
implement things as suggested. Just a few queries:
1) As I am interested in sending bulk mails, I am contemplating modification
of my DNS zone file with SPF
Dear Frank,
Thanks a lot for responding. I am now reading through the net and trying to
implement things as suggested. Just a few queries:
1) As I am interested in sending bulk mails, I am contemplating modification
of my DNS zone file with SPF record. Some articles in the net talk about
Hello
1 - configure your DNS SPF record
2 - Use DKIM to sign your emails
3 - Use a mailing lists software ( LISTSERV Mailman ... etc )
We have been in trouble with gmail yahoo hotmail before doing this
after configuring Postfix and Bind like this we do not have blacklist
troubles with those emai
Dear List,
We are running our mailing system using Postfix (postfix-2.0.16-14.RHEL3).
We need to send communications to our shareholders (around 15000 of them)
using the mailing system. If we simply send the mails using things like
phpmailer etc. then we fear that
1) 1) There could be
Sahil Tandon a écrit :
> bharathan kailath wrote:
>
>> one of our customer send mass mails thru our postfix server; is it
>> possible to restrict number of mail recipient for a particular sender!
>> help appreciated.
>
> Use a policy service. With postfwd, to limit m...@mailer.com to 20
> recipi
bharathan kailath wrote:
one of our customer send mass mails thru our postfix server; is it
possible to restrict number of mail recipient for a particular sender!
help appreciated.
Use a policy service. With postfwd, to limit m...@mailer.com to 20
recipients per message, something like:
i
Hi
one of our customer send mass mails thru our postfix server; is it possible
to restrict number of mail recipient for a particular sender!
help appreciated.
thanks
25 matches
Mail list logo
