On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 21:36 -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> This is a "best practices" question for other Postfix users who may be using
> Postfix to send email to large opt-in mailing lists.
>
> So with all that explained, I have few questions:
>
> 1) What's the optimal way for us to process t
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:36:58 -0800
Steve Jenkins articulated:
[snip]
> In getting our newsletter campaigns ready to send, we believe we've
> done everything all the big ESPs ask: a relatively up-to-date version
> of Postfix (2.3.3), a dedicated IP with a good reputation and no
> blacklists, valid
Happy New Year to you all.
This is a "best practices" question for other Postfix users who may be using
Postfix to send email to large opt-in mailing lists.
We have a subscriber list of 1MM+ registered members of a popular video game
website. The vast majority of them are also opted in for our mo
mouss:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:39:41PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> >> - try to parse your postfix logs for invalid addresses.
> >> This way, you can ignore bounces
> >
> > Why do you want to pull data you normally get pushed free house?
>
>
> because parsing the logs is t
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:39:41PM +0200, mouss wrote:
- try to parse your postfix logs for invalid addresses.
This way, you can ignore bounces
Why do you want to pull data you normally get pushed free house?
because parsing the logs is trivial compared to parsing a mes
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:39:41PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> - try to parse your postfix logs for invalid addresses.
> This way, you can ignore bounces
Why do you want to pull data you normally get pushed free house?
Bastian
--
We Klingons believe as you do -- the sick should die. Only the strong
Stefan Palme:
> On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 06:52 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Stefan Palme:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Our mail server is configured to use special envelope sender addresses
> > > for some outgoing mail so that bounces can be processed automatically.
> > >
> > > The "bounce processor
Stefan Palme wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 06:52 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stefan Palme:
Hi all,
Our mail server is configured to use special envelope sender addresses
for some outgoing mail so that bounces can be processed automatically.
The "bounce processor" is a self-made script. Are the
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 06:52 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stefan Palme:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Our mail server is configured to use special envelope sender addresses
> > for some outgoing mail so that bounces can be processed automatically.
> >
> > The "bounce processor" is a self-made script. Are t
Stefan Palme:
> Hi all,
>
> Our mail server is configured to use special envelope sender addresses
> for some outgoing mail so that bounces can be processed automatically.
>
> The "bounce processor" is a self-made script. Are there any hints what
> to look for in a bounced mail to be sure, that i
Hi all,
Our mail server is configured to use special envelope sender addresses
for some outgoing mail so that bounces can be processed automatically.
The "bounce processor" is a self-made script. Are there any hints what
to look for in a bounced mail to be sure, that it really is a bounce
caused
11 matches
Mail list logo
