On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:36:58 -0800 Steve Jenkins <st...@stevejenkins.com> articulated:
[snip] > In getting our newsletter campaigns ready to send, we believe we've > done everything all the big ESPs ask: a relatively up-to-date version > of Postfix (2.3.3), a dedicated IP with a good reputation and no > blacklists, valid SPF record, valid DKIM signing, and we've signed up > for every FBL we could find. I think you may seriously want to reexamine the term: "relatively up-to-date". Unless there is some over riding reason for using this version, I would strongly recommend updating to the latest stable version. > 3) Would we be better off using VERP instead of our custom > Return-Path? I've read through > http://www.postfix.org/VERP_README.html but can't tell if that gives > us any advantage over the approach we're using. On the mailing lists that I have worked on, we have always employed "VERP". I has worked very well and is usually easily understood. Most mailing list management programs can easily implement it. -- Jerry ✌ postfix-u...@seibercom.net _____________________________________________________________________ TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
