On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:27:52AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > On 2 Aug 2012, at 14:17, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > > The prime directive for Postfix is to deliver mail reliably without
> > > sucking from a performance or human interface point of view, and
> > > without granting unnecessary
Jim Reid:
> On 2 Aug 2012, at 14:17, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > The prime directive for Postfix is to deliver mail reliably without
> > sucking from a performance or human interface point of view, and
> > without granting unnecessary privileges to random strangers.
>
> Too bad your prime directiv
Wietse:
> If you don't like the result, use one of the following in
> the SMTP daemon to block their mail:
>
> check_client_mx_access (ditto for helo, sender, recipient, etc.)
> check_client_mx_access (ditto for helo, sender, recipient, etc.)
[the second one should be check_mumble_ns_access, for
Jim Reid:
> On 2 Aug 2012, at 10:44, Varadi Gabor wrote:
>
> > The log also shows that the "warning: numeric domain name in
> > resource data of MX record for bond.com: 0.0.0.0"
>
> Yes, I saw that. This should have resulted in a hard error, not a
> warning.
If you don't like the result, use
On 2 Aug 2012, at 10:44, Varadi Gabor wrote:
The log also shows that the "warning: numeric domain name in
resource data of MX record for bond.com: 0.0.0.0"
Yes, I saw that. This should have resulted in a hard error, not a
warning.
I want solutions not only in this case in particular, but
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 10:18:42AM +0100, Jim Reid wrote:
> First off, this is not a Postfix problem. The MX record for bond.com is
> spectacularly broken. It's an epic fail. That's what needs to be fixed.
I did not say that postfix would be a mistake :)
The log also shows that the "warning: num
On 2 Aug 2012, at 08:38, Varadi Gabor wrote:
Sorry because my English.
No problem. It's *far* better than my Hungarian. :-)
Besides, you've provided full, unedited information -- log entries,
dig output, etc -- which makes it clear exactly what the problem is.
If only everyone did that...
