[Resolved] Upgrade version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1

2010-12-07 Thread Bruno Costacurta
.. I intend to upgrade Postfix version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1. Are there incompatibilities or specific path for upgrade ? Or any manual re-configuration to be done ? .. This server is a Debian Lenny and upgrade will be done via the Debian lenny-backports repository usage wich included Postfix v2.7.1

Re: Upgrade version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1

2010-12-01 Thread DTNX/NGMX Postmaster
On 01/12/2010, at 23:40, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Victor Duchovni put forth on 12/1/2010 3:41 PM: >> It would be unwise of LaMont or Debian, having selected a particular >> Postfix 2.x release (say 2.7) to not track the patch updates from time to >> time. I understand that Debian stable or backports

Re: Upgrade version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1

2010-12-01 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Victor Duchovni put forth on 12/1/2010 3:41 PM: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 03:11:12PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >> Victor Duchovni put forth on 12/1/2010 2:28 PM: >>> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 09:19:52PM +0100, Bruno Costacurta wrote: >>> >>>> I intend

Re: Upgrade version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1

2010-12-01 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 03:11:12PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Victor Duchovni put forth on 12/1/2010 2:28 PM: > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 09:19:52PM +0100, Bruno Costacurta wrote: > > > >> I intend to upgrade Postfix version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1. > > > > May a

Re: Upgrade version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1

2010-12-01 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Victor Duchovni put forth on 12/1/2010 2:28 PM: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 09:19:52PM +0100, Bruno Costacurta wrote: > >> I intend to upgrade Postfix version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1. > > May as well use 2.7.2. The OP sticks to Debian Stable and Backports packages Viktor, as I do. We&

Re: Upgrade version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1

2010-12-01 Thread fakessh @
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 01.12.2010 21:49, Stan Hoeppner a écrit : > Bruno Costacurta put forth on 12/1/2010 2:19 PM: >> Hello, >> >> I intend to upgrade Postfix version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1. >> Are there incompatibilities or specific path for up

Re: Upgrade version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1

2010-12-01 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Bruno Costacurta put forth on 12/1/2010 2:19 PM: > Hello, > > I intend to upgrade Postfix version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1. > Are there incompatibilities or specific path for upgrade ? > Or any manual re-configuration to be done ? I performed this exact backports upgrade about a week ag

Re: Upgrade version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1

2010-12-01 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 09:19:52PM +0100, Bruno Costacurta wrote: > I intend to upgrade Postfix version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1. May as well use 2.7.2. > Are there incompatibilities or specific path for upgrade ? The Postfix 2.7 source code includes: RELEASE_NOTES RELEASE_NOT

Upgrade version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1

2010-12-01 Thread Bruno Costacurta
Hello, I intend to upgrade Postfix version 2.5.5 to 2.7.1. Are there incompatibilities or specific path for upgrade ? Or any manual re-configuration to be done ? At the end of this email I posted my postconf -n Thanks for info. * note : I know the famous "if it is not broken, do not f

Re: too much config version 2.5.5,

2010-07-29 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 07/29/2010 05:07 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote: Jul 29 10:20:08 mx2 postfix/smtpd[63722]: connect from mail2.beth.k12.pa.us[192.227.0.10] Jul 29 10:20:08 mx2 postfix/smtpd[63722]: 15B7551C06DA: client=mail2.beth.k12.pa.us[192.227.0.10] Jul 29 10:20:08 mx2 postfix/cleanup[63726]: 15B7551C06DA:

Re: too much config version 2.5.5,

2010-07-29 Thread Wietse Venema
donovan jeffrey j: > thanks for the reply, i did the update and have no errors on postfix check. > > i have setup a test on my mx server to transport mail for > lukeskywal...@beth.k12.pa.us to mx2.beth.k12.pa.us ( my new 10.6 filter ) > > so far my mail2 primary mx can send to the filter (mx2).

Re: too much config version 2.5.5,

2010-07-29 Thread donovan jeffrey j
On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > donovan jeffrey j: >> >> On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> >>> The simplest way to upgrade an existing configuration is: >>> >>> - Back up the new main.cf, master.cf, postfix-files, postfix-script >>> and post-install files

Re: too much config version 2.5.5,

2010-07-29 Thread Wietse Venema
donovan jeffrey j: > > On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > The simplest way to upgrade an existing configuration is: > > > > - Back up the new main.cf, master.cf, postfix-files, postfix-script > > and post-install files. > > > > - Install the old main.cf and old master.cf an

Re: too much config version 2.5.5,

2010-07-29 Thread donovan jeffrey j
On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > The simplest way to upgrade an existing configuration is: > > - Back up the new main.cf, master.cf, postfix-files, postfix-script > and post-install files. > > - Install the old main.cf and old master.cf and any files that > you have added to

Re: too much config version 2.5.5,

2010-07-29 Thread Wietse Venema
donovan jeffrey j: > version 2.5.5, > > greetings > im upgrading a couple of xserves to 10.6 from 10.4. the main.cf > used to be pretty straight forward. The default main.cf on 10.6 > snow leopard server has overwhelmed my old eyeballs. may new lines > most i understand but

too much config version 2.5.5,

2010-07-28 Thread donovan jeffrey j
version 2.5.5, greetings im upgrading a couple of xserves to 10.6 from 10.4. the main.cf used to be pretty straight forward. The default main.cf on 10.6 snow leopard server has overwhelmed my old eyeballs. may new lines most i understand but they pretty much list every option known to man

Re: Version 2.5.5

2009-05-23 Thread Wietse Venema
Scott Haneda: > On May 23, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Scott Haneda: > >> I have a test server about ready to become a live server, version > >> 2.5.5. Is it correct that prior to the 2.6 release, that 2.5.7 would > >> be the latest I wan

Re: Version 2.5.5

2009-05-23 Thread Bill Landry
Scott Haneda wrote: > Thank you Wietse. One point of clarification please. If 2.5.7 has > defect back ports from 2.6, then that equates to new features brought > into 2.5.7? Wietse said: "Postfix 2.5.7 has 'defect fixes' back-ported from Postfix 2.6.0." [Emphasis added] Note that he says "de

Re: Version 2.5.5

2009-05-23 Thread Scott Haneda
On May 23, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Scott Haneda: I have a test server about ready to become a live server, version 2.5.5. Is it correct that prior to the 2.6 release, that 2.5.7 would be the latest I want to run? Unlike other products, you are not expected to stop using

Re: Version 2.5.5

2009-05-23 Thread Wietse Venema
Scott Haneda: > I have a test server about ready to become a live server, version > 2.5.5. Is it correct that prior to the 2.6 release, that 2.5.7 would > be the latest I want to run? Unlike other products, you are not expected to stop using Postfix version X when Postfix versi

Version 2.5.5

2009-05-23 Thread Scott Haneda
I have a test server about ready to become a live server, version 2.5.5. Is it correct that prior to the 2.6 release, that 2.5.7 would be the latest I want to run? I see http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-2.5.7.html shows what I would call minor issues for the 2.5.7 release set