Re: VRFY problem

2008-10-30 Thread Pete Fuggle
Thanks Wietse. I went ahead and disabled the VRFY verb and have not had any resulting adverse affects yet. 2008/10/29 Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > That understanding is not supported by RFC 821, 2821, ... Oh, yeah. Those. I have flipped through them a few times but didn't on this oc

Re: VRFY problem

2008-10-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Pete Fuggle: > So it seems that > smtpd_recipient_restrictions are somehow being invoked when VRFY is used? VRFY is pretty useless by now because many sites disable it. Postfix invokes smtpd_recipient_restrictions to make the reply similar to that of RCPT TO (no point to have VRFY reply with 2xx

VRFY problem

2008-10-28 Thread Pete Fuggle
Hi All. I have observed some strange behavior when using VRFY against my Postfix relays. I use GLD greylisting called as a policy service: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/recip_access, permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks, c