Thanks Wietse.
I went ahead and disabled the VRFY verb and have not had any resulting
adverse affects yet.
2008/10/29 Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> That understanding is not supported by RFC 821, 2821, ...
Oh, yeah. Those. I have flipped through them a few times but didn't on this
oc
Pete Fuggle:
> So it seems that
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions are somehow being invoked when VRFY is used?
VRFY is pretty useless by now because many sites disable it.
Postfix invokes smtpd_recipient_restrictions to make the reply
similar to that of RCPT TO (no point to have VRFY reply with 2xx
Hi All.
I have observed some strange behavior when using VRFY against my Postfix
relays.
I use GLD greylisting called as a policy service:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
pcre:/etc/postfix/recip_access,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
permit_mynetworks,
c