Thanks Wietse.

I went ahead and disabled the VRFY verb and have not had any resulting
adverse affects yet.

2008/10/29 Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
>
> That understanding is not supported by RFC 821, 2821, ...


Oh, yeah. Those. I have flipped through them a few times but didn't on this
occasion. Consider me self-RTFMed! D'oh.

Cheers,

Pete


>
>
>        Wietse
>
> > So apart from wanting to understand what is going on, my question is
> whether
> > or not I should just disable VRFY, and what are any pitfalls of doing so?
> I
> > was content to have it monotonously return 252 but if it is broken and I
> > don't need it then I will turn it off.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Pete
>
>

Reply via email to