On 11/14/2010 3:29 AM, Will Fong wrote:
On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:28 AM, John Hinton wrote:
And, as our client base is controlled and are not spammer, avoiding
all spam checks on outbound is awesome. I used milters in sendmail in
order to do rejects and those checked all in and all out.
Hi J
On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:28 AM, John Hinton wrote:
>
> And, as our client base is controlled and are not spammer, avoiding all spam
> checks on outbound is awesome. I used milters in sendmail in order to do
> rejects and those checked all in and all out.
>
Hi John,
What do you mean by "controll
On 11/13/2010 05:28 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 11/13/2010 11:01 AM, John Hinton wrote:
OK, on a CentOS 5.X server with Amavisd-new and Postfix.
I think I still need some suggestions for tuning. I notice in my
logs, that dictionary attacks are normally being rejected by RBL,
mainly Spamhaus ins
On 11/13/2010 11:01 AM, John Hinton wrote:
OK, on a CentOS 5.X server with Amavisd-new and Postfix.
I think I still need some suggestions for tuning. I notice in my logs,
that dictionary attacks are normally being rejected by RBL, mainly
Spamhaus instead of failing due to unknown user. Is my t
OK, on a CentOS 5.X server with Amavisd-new and Postfix.
I think I still need some suggestions for tuning. I notice in my logs,
that dictionary attacks are normally being rejected by RBL, mainly
Spamhaus instead of failing due to unknown user. Is my thinking correct
in that doing unknown user
