On 03/22/2015 08:19 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
> Thanks Peter. Very instructive. I'm on Red Hat Fedora 21, which came
> out this week, which, now that you tell me Postfix version 3 is out,
> surprises me that the upgrade didn't take that into account and give
> it to me. The Fedora project is conserv
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 20:24:17 +, you wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:53:12PM -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
>
>> I am usually fairly good at this, but some of the organizational and
>> configuration symbol-name differences between Postfix 2.5.5 and 2.10.5
>> are, well, way out there! :-) I tho
On 03/22/2015 07:53 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
> I am usually fairly good at this, but some of the organizational and
> configuration symbol-name differences between Postfix 2.5.5 and 2.10.5
> are, well, way out there! :-) I thought I could drop the 2.5.5 .conf
> file into place on the 2.10.5 system.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:53:12PM -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
> I am usually fairly good at this, but some of the organizational and
> configuration symbol-name differences between Postfix 2.5.5 and 2.10.5
> are, well, way out there! :-) I thought I could drop the 2.5.5 .conf
> file into place on
I am usually fairly good at this, but some of the organizational and
configuration symbol-name differences between Postfix 2.5.5 and 2.10.5
are, well, way out there! :-) I thought I could drop the 2.5.5 .conf
file into place on the 2.10.5 system. No! To many symbols that have
changed, or section fo
