On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:53:12PM -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
> I am usually fairly good at this, but some of the organizational and
> configuration symbol-name differences between Postfix 2.5.5 and 2.10.5
> are, well, way out there! :-) I thought I could drop the 2.5.5 .conf
> file into place on the 2.10.5 system. No! To many symbols that have
> changed, or section formats that are different. Anyone care to
> volunteer to sit with me and my files for hhalf an hour to get these
> dependencies resolved?
See:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vdukhovni/postfix/master/postfix/RELEASE_NOTES-2.6
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vdukhovni/postfix/master/postfix/RELEASE_NOTES-2.7
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vdukhovni/postfix/master/postfix/RELEASE_NOTES-2.8
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vdukhovni/postfix/master/postfix/RELEASE_NOTES-2.9
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vdukhovni/postfix/master/postfix/RELEASE_NOTES-2.10
All major differences are described there. Generally you should
be able to take an older set of configuration files, run
# postfix upgrade-configuration
and have a working system that behaves in a backwards-compatible
way. Some Debian systems ship with a postfix-files file that does
not match what the package delivers. On those systems you may
need to edit /usr/libexec/postfix/postfix-files to remove any
lines pertaining to files that are not delivered with the package.
--
Viktor.
