Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing (Solved, no, Really!)

LuKreme a écrit : > On 4-Mar-2009, at 15:18, Robert A. Ober wrote: >> Thanks to Brian and others for hanging in there with me! > > I think you owe everyone on this thread (which I was not part of, so no > self-interest) a beer. :) > I wasn't either, but I want a Franziskaner ;-p for OP: sasl

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing (Solved, no, Really!)

On 4-Mar-2009, at 15:18, Robert A. Ober wrote: Thanks to Brian and others for hanging in there with me! I think you owe everyone on this thread (which I was not part of, so no self-interest) a beer. :) -- #27794 ... I wonder if the really nerdy Klingons learn how to speak english

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing (Solved, no, Really!)

On 3/4/2009 1:57 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 1:06 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing (Solved, Almost)

Robert A. Ober wrote: > On 3/4/2009 1:06 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: >> Robert A. Ober wrote: >> >>> On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote: >>> On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: >> >> FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing (Solved, Almost)

On 3/4/2009 1:06 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot Right and that means the type is C

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing (Solved, Almost)

Robert A. Ober wrote: > On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote: >> On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: >> FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot > Right and that means the type is Cyrus? > > Robert You seem to have had Cyrus working, but want to break it to try to us

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing

On Wed March 4 2009 08:39:37 Victor Duchovni wrote: > If I recall correctly the OP reported using Postfix 2.2 and should > see: > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sasl_type > > attempts to use Dovecot SASL auth with Postfix 2.2 are unlikely to > get very far. I did it, but I chea

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing (Solved, Almost)

On 3/4/2009 12:32 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: Robert A. Ober wrote vi /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd : FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing (Solved, Almost)

On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: Robert A. Ober wrote vi /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd : FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot There is some issue with Mandriva 2009.0

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing (Solved, Almost)

On 3/4/2009 11:54 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: Robert A. Ober wrote vi /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd : FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot There is some issue with Mandriva 2009.0

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing (Solved, Almost)

Robert A. Ober wrote: > On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: >> Robert A. Ober wrote >> > vi /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd : > > FYI: saslauthd is Cyrus not Dovecot > > There is some issue with Mandriva 2009.0 that requires > SASL_AUTHMECH=shadow in /etc/sasl2/saslauthd. > > N

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing (Solved, Almost)

On 3/4/2009 10:19 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 9:56 AM, Scent-Sations Support wrote: Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 9:48 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: No, postfix -n does not return anything except a posfix generated error. It doe

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing

Robert A. Ober wrote: > On 3/4/2009 9:56 AM, Scent-Sations Support wrote: >> Robert A. Ober wrote: >> >>> On 3/4/2009 9:48 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: >>> >>> No, postfix -n does not return anything except a posfix generated >>> error. It does not like the -n . >>> >>> >> Charles means

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing

On 3/4/2009 9:56 AM, Scent-Sations Support wrote: Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 9:48 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: No, postfix -n does not return anything except a posfix generated error. It does not like the -n . Charles means 'postconf -n'. This gives us a better picture o

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing

On 3/4/2009, Scent-Sations Support (grkni...@scent-team.com) wrote: > Charles means 'postconf -n'. > This gives us a better picture of what Postfix is using and avoids fat > finger mistakes. Ooops... lol, sorry, thanks for catching that...

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing

Robert A. Ober wrote: > On 3/4/2009 9:48 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: >> > No, postfix -n does not return anything except a posfix generated > error. It does not like the -n . > Charles means 'postconf -n'. This gives us a better picture of what Postfix is using and avoids fat finger mistakes. Bria

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing

On 3/4/2009 9:50 AM, Robert A. Ober wrote: On 3/4/2009 9:48 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: Hi Robert, You need to read the responses you are getting... PS: postfix -n gives invalid option. This is because of this: No, postfix -n does not return anything except a posfix generated

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing

On 3/4/2009 9:48 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: Hi Robert, You need to read the responses you are getting... PS: postfix -n gives invalid option. This is because of this: No, postfix -n does not return anything except a posfix generated error. It does not like the -n . Plain

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing

Hi Robert, You need to read the responses you are getting... > PS: postfix -n gives invalid option. This is because of this: >> If I recall correctly the OP reported using Postfix 2.2 and- should >> see: >> >> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sasl_type >> >> attempts to use Dovec

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing

On 3/4/2009 8:39 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:31:21AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: On 3/4/2009, Robert A. Ober (ro...@robob.com) wrote: # "dovecot -n" command gives a clean output of the changed settings. Use it # instead of copy&pasting this file when postin

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing

On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:31:21AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 3/4/2009, Robert A. Ober (ro...@robob.com) wrote: > > # "dovecot -n" command gives a clean output of the changed settings. Use it > > # instead of copy&pasting this file when posting to the Dovecot mailing > > list. > > # --with

Re: That Relay Access Denied Thing

On 3/4/2009, Robert A. Ober (ro...@robob.com) wrote: > # "dovecot -n" command gives a clean output of the changed settings. Use it > # instead of copy&pasting this file when posting to the Dovecot mailing list. > # --with-ssldir=/etc/ssl You need to read the welcome message you got... ONLY provi

That Relay Access Denied Thing

Hello Folks, I am a longtime Linux user and admin. Server drive got somewhat corrupt so I re-installed to new drive. Using Mandrive 2009.0 from the live CD with Postfix retrieved via urpmi. Using 2.2 and Dovecot. Tried Cyrus also. I have used uw-pop3 and pop-before-smtp in the past. Most