On 25/02/16 06:25, i...@itrezero.it wrote:
> I compiled postfix 3.0.3 from source code but (maybe a stupid question)…
> don’t know how to start it at boot of a Centos 7 machine!
>
> Tried with “chkconfig” and “systemctl” without any results!
>
> How can I do this? Is there a “postfix.service” to
: mercoledì 24 febbraio 2016 18:32
A: i...@itrezero.it; postfix-users@postfix.org
Oggetto: RE: Starting postfix at boot time on Centos 7
Not sure if this will help, but a Google search returned this link:
<https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-configure-a-linux-service
This command should just read
rpm -Uvh --nodeps $(repoquery --location postfix-sysvinit)
On 24/02/2016 5:48 pm, Danny Horne wrote:
> rpm -Uvh --nodeps $(repoquery --location postfix-sysvinit)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Because you installed for source rather than through Yum, you haven't
got the System V init scripts. If you try to install these via Yum
it'll want to install Postfix as well, to avoid that run -
|rpm -Uvh --nodeps $(repoquery --location postfix-sysvinit)|
Then you'll be able to run -
systemctl
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 06:25:08PM +0100, i...@itrezero.it wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I compiled postfix 3.0.3 from source code but (maybe a stupid question).
> don't know how to start it at boot of a Centos 7 machine!
>
> Tried with "chkconfig" and "systemctl" without any results!
>
> How can I do th
...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of i...@itrezero.it
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 11:25 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Starting postfix at boot time on Centos 7
Hi all.
I compiled postfix 3.0.3 from source code but (maybe a stupid question)… don’t
know how to start it at boot of a Centos 7
Hi all.
I compiled postfix 3.0.3 from source code but (maybe a stupid question).
don't know how to start it at boot of a Centos 7 machine!
Tried with "chkconfig" and "systemctl" without any results!
How can I do this? Is there a "postfix.service" to be enabled with
systemctl?
Thank you very muc
Patrick Ben Koetter put forth on 2/25/2011 4:20 PM:
> * lst_ho...@kwsoft.de :
>> Zitat von Wietse Venema :
>>> This is now running on an Ubuntu virtual machine.
>>
>> Cool...
>> And BTW i also have never seen Postfix die. It is one of the most
>> stable non-trivial software systems i have seen unti
On 2/26/11 2:06 AM, Christian Roessner at
c+postfix_org...@roessner-network-solutions.com wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 26.02.2011, 08:51 +0100 schrieb Christian Roessner:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> This got my attention because I run the Apple provided Postfix (2.5.5) on
>>> Mac OS X client (10.6.6 specifically).
Am Samstag, den 26.02.2011, 08:51 +0100 schrieb Christian Roessner:
> Hi,
>
> > This got my attention because I run the Apple provided Postfix (2.5.5) on
> > Mac OS X client (10.6.6 specifically). What do you know - when I look at the
> > launchctl plist Apple provides to start Postfix, it does s
Hi,
> This got my attention because I run the Apple provided Postfix (2.5.5) on
> Mac OS X client (10.6.6 specifically). What do you know - when I look at the
> launchctl plist Apple provides to start Postfix, it does so by running
> master directly. Thanks Apple!
Calling /usr/libexec/postfix/mas
The operative words are desktop computer, the problem it would seem to
me, is that Upstart is being used in an environment for which it has not
been designed and is trying to solve problems that do not occur on a server.
Perhaps we need to point this out to the good folks at Ubuntu etc.
jut my
Larry Stone:
> On 2/25/11 6:45 AM, Christian Roessner at
> c+postfix_org...@roessner-network-solutions.com wrote:
>
> > That postfix must not be started directly by calling master should also
> > be documented in the master man page, as people like me (and my idea was
> > based on Apple's practise
On 2/25/11 6:45 AM, Christian Roessner at
c+postfix_org...@roessner-network-solutions.com wrote:
> That postfix must not be started directly by calling master should also
> be documented in the master man page, as people like me (and my idea was
> based on Apple's practise, like they DO START post
* lst_ho...@kwsoft.de :
> Zitat von Wietse Venema :
> >This is now running on an Ubuntu virtual machine.
>
> Cool...
> And BTW i also have never seen Postfix die. It is one of the most
> stable non-trivial software systems i have seen until now.
Postfix is frustrating. At first tt's fun because i
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Christian Roessner:
This is, what I learned. So now my question: what do you have in mind
Wietse, if you say, you may provide something? Do not get me wrong
I have written a "postfix upstart" command as described below.
This can automatically respawn Postfix in sing
Christian Roessner:
> This is, what I learned. So now my question: what do you have in mind
> Wietse, if you say, you may provide something? Do not get me wrong
I have written a "postfix upstart" command as described below.
This can automatically respawn Postfix in single instance mode
(even if I
Hi,
> That was the construct i tried to explain. A wrapper/pacifier whatever
> is needed which does not terminate but does nothing until a "stop" or
> some other event arrives.
>
> > They should not start and stop the master directly. Among other
> > things, that does not work with multi-in
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
> Wietse Venema:
>> lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>> > Zitat von Wietse Venema :
>> >
>> > > lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>> > >> The "problem" is more of that distribution like Ubuntu and
Redhat are
>> > >> moving to "upstart" for boo
Christian Roessner:
> Hi,
>
> > > > Postfix "job" script:
> > > >
> > > > pre-start exec postfix start
> > > > post-stop exec postfix stop
> > > >
> > > > With this, the system will do the work for them, and everything
> > > > uses stable documented interfaces.
>
> sorry Wietse, i
Hi,
> > > Postfix "job" script:
> > >
> > > pre-start exec postfix start
> > > post-stop exec postfix stop
> > >
> > > With this, the system will do the work for them, and everything
> > > uses stable documented interfaces.
sorry Wietse, if it really would have been so easy, I nev
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> Zitat von Wietse Venema :
>
> > Wietse Venema:
> >> lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> >> > Zitat von Wietse Venema :
> >> >
> >> > > lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> >> > >> The "problem" is more of that distribution like Ubuntu and Redhat are
> >> > >> moving to "upstart" for boot and starting
On 2/25/2011 8:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
The problem with this approach is that Postfix is not one program,
like named, apache, etc., and that simply starting one master daemon
is insufficient as it skips all the start-up repair and sanity checks.
That's why i said it may be useful to have a s
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:08:51PM +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
[...]
> >Is there any reason they can't do this:
> >
> >Postfix "job" script:
> >
> > pre-start exec postfix start
> > post-stop exec postfix stop
> >
> >With this, the system will do the work for them, and everythin
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Wietse Venema:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> Zitat von Wietse Venema :
>
> > lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> >> The "problem" is more of that distribution like Ubuntu and Redhat are
> >> moving to "upstart" for boot and starting services/daemons. The main
> >> difference for the start
Wietse Venema:
> lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> > Zitat von Wietse Venema :
> >
> > > lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> > >> The "problem" is more of that distribution like Ubuntu and Redhat are
> > >> moving to "upstart" for boot and starting services/daemons. The main
> > >> difference for the started services is
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> Zitat von Wietse Venema :
>
> > lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> >> The "problem" is more of that distribution like Ubuntu and Redhat are
> >> moving to "upstart" for boot and starting services/daemons. The main
> >> difference for the started services is that upstart need the program
Hi,
> That's why i said it may be useful to have a simple
> "dispatcher/wrapper" which only is started to call "postfix start" and
> keeps running to keep upstart happy and calls "postfix stop/restart"
> when advised to do so by upstart. With this the supported way of
> starting/stopping i
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
The "problem" is more of that distribution like Ubuntu and Redhat are
moving to "upstart" for boot and starting services/daemons. The main
difference for the started services is that upstart need the program
to *not* daemonize or terminate itself b
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> The "problem" is more of that distribution like Ubuntu and Redhat are
> moving to "upstart" for boot and starting services/daemons. The main
> difference for the started services is that upstart need the program
> to *not* daemonize or terminate itself because status is
Hi,
> The "problem" is more of that distribution like Ubuntu and Redhat are
> moving to "upstart" for boot and starting services/daemons. The main
> difference for the started services is that upstart need the program
> to *not* daemonize or terminate itself because status is checked
> di
Zitat von Victor Duchovni :
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:58:22AM +0100, Christian Roessner wrote:
I am currently preparing an upstart script for Ubuntu. I tried several
ways do use /usr/sbin/postfix, but I never would get the master PID. So
I looked at the postfix.c code.
There is a no single
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:58:22AM +0100, Christian Roessner wrote:
> I am currently preparing an upstart script for Ubuntu. I tried several
> ways do use /usr/sbin/postfix, but I never would get the master PID. So
> I looked at the postfix.c code.
There is a no single "master pid". A fully-gener
Christian Roessner:
> > If you must persist along this path then I request that you stop
> > distributing Postfix. I will get all the complaints about the things
> > that you break, and I will have to deal with the consequences for
> > Postfix's reputation.
>
> Don't fear it. I am not going to do
> If you must persist along this path then I request that you stop
> distributing Postfix. I will get all the complaints about the things
> that you break, and I will have to deal with the consequences for
> Postfix's reputation.
Don't fear it. I am not going to do something that breaks postfix. T
Christian Roessner:
> Hi,
>
> > The only supported way to start Postfix is "postfix start", using
> > the commands provided with /etc/postfix/postfix-script.
> >
> > DO NOT TINKER WITH THIS.
> >
> > SUSE people discovered years ago that their home-grown approach to
> > stop Postfix would termi
Hi,
> The only supported way to start Postfix is "postfix start", using
> the commands provided with /etc/postfix/postfix-script.
>
> DO NOT TINKER WITH THIS.
>
> SUSE people discovered years ago that their home-grown approach to
> stop Postfix would terminate a lot more processes than just Po
Christian Roessner:
>
> I am currently preparing an upstart script for Ubuntu. I tried several way
>-s do use /usr/sbin/postfix, but I never would get the master PID. So I looke
>-d at the postfix.c code.
The only supported way to start Postfix is "postfix start", using
the commands provided with
Hi,
I am currently preparing an upstart script for Ubuntu. I tried several ways do
use /usr/sbin/postfix, but I never would get the master PID. So I looked at the
postfix.c code.
Is it a problem to start /usr/lib/postfix/master -c /etc/postfix from the init
system? I believe I have seen in ups
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:03:48 -0400 (EDT)
Rob Foehl wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Jose Carlos Madrid wrote:
>
> > you were right. I edited the file in Windows. I didn't realize. But
> > after save it with vi editor It still keeps giving me this error.
> > Notice it is not (line 1: missing '=' af
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Jose Carlos Madrid wrote:
you were right. I edited the file in Windows. I didn't realize. But
after save it with vi editor It still keeps giving me this error. Notice
it is not (line 1: missing '=' after attribute name: "??u") anymore but
similar.
Please don't top post.
-
> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:26:54 -0400
> From: r...@loonybin.net
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Problem starting Postfix: mysql_alias.cf, line 1: missing '='
>
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Jose Carlos Madrid wrote:
>
>> Sep 1
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Jose Carlos Madrid wrote:
Sep 14 11:25:30 hostname postfix/cleanup[30095]: fatal: /etc/postfix/mysql_alias.cf, line
1: missing '=' after attribute name: "??h"
It appears you have saved mysql_alias.cf in a UTF-16 encoding. Don't do
that; Postfix configuration files are p
Hi, I am just dealing with my first Postfix installation.
After
following a few tutorials, I’m still not able to start the Postfix
server. I looked for solutions in many forums, but I cannot find this
problem and no one could help me. Tailing the log files there is an error
coming over and over:
44 matches
Mail list logo
