Hi!
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:41:20PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Anyway, if you had the time and inclination and were able to get
>> your hands on a few units, it would be great to see some basic
>> queue performance data from you on S
Hi!
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner put forth on 8/16/2010 6:56 PM:
>> Wietse Venema put forth on 8/16/2010 2:36 PM:
>>> Stan Hoeppner:
Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the
typical definition of "Enterprise grade
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:41:20PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Anyway, if you had the time and inclination and were able to get
> your hands on a few units, it would be great to see some basic
> queue performance data from you on SSD vs a disk based test rig
> you use.
Victor Duchovni:
> All ben
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:41:20PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Anyway, if you had the time and inclination and were able to get your hands on
> a few units, it would be great to see some basic queue performance data from
> you on SSD vs a disk based test rig you use.
All benchmarks are artifici
Wietse Venema put forth on 8/17/2010 6:11 AM:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> Wietse Venema put forth on 8/16/2010 2:36 PM:
>>> Stan Hoeppner:
Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the
typical definition of "Enterprise grade", in their operations. And Google
is
Stan Hoeppner:
> Wietse Venema put forth on 8/16/2010 2:36 PM:
> > Stan Hoeppner:
> >> Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the
> >> typical definition of "Enterprise grade", in their operations. And Google
> >> is
> >> the undisputed single largest operator of se
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 8/16/2010 6:56 PM:
> Wietse Venema put forth on 8/16/2010 2:36 PM:
>> Stan Hoeppner:
>>> Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the
>>> typical definition of "Enterprise grade", in their operations. And Google
>>> is
>>> the undisputed sin
Wietse Venema put forth on 8/16/2010 2:36 PM:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the
>> typical definition of "Enterprise grade", in their operations. And Google is
>> the undisputed single largest operator of servers on the planet. I think
Stan Hoeppner:
> Google uses less than 1/10th of 1% "Enterprise grade" hardware, using the
> typical definition of "Enterprise grade", in their operations. And Google is
> the undisputed single largest operator of servers on the planet. I think that
> qualifies them as an "Enterprise". ;)
Indeed
Noel Jones put forth on 8/16/2010 10:03 AM:
> On 8/16/2010 9:36 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Ram put forth on 8/16/2010 8:19 AM:
>>
>>> But Enterprise quality SSD's are so expensive. I can get an additional
>>> server and still save money.
>>
>> I call BS:
>>
>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product
On 8/16/2010 9:36 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ram put forth on 8/16/2010 8:19 AM:
But Enterprise quality SSD's are so expensive. I can get an additional
server and still save money.
I call BS:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167023
... Yeah, it's fast.
Whether you
Ram put forth on 8/16/2010 8:19 AM:
> But Enterprise quality SSD's are so expensive. I can get an additional
> server and still save money.
I call BS:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167023
$214 USD is _not_ expensive at all, and only a fraction of the cost of a
server
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 17:35 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Friday 13 August 2010 19:58:38 Noel Jones wrote:
> > On 8/13/2010 8:22 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > On Friday 13 August 2010 14:23:51 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > >> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > >>> * Ram:
> > Mail in plain text format , mime e
On Friday 13 August 2010 19:58:38 Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/13/2010 8:22 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Friday 13 August 2010 14:23:51 Wietse Venema wrote:
> >> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> >>> * Ram:
> Mail in plain text format , mime encoded message
> >>>
> >>> OK!
> >>>
> Currenlty I get 40/s
On 8/13/2010 8:22 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday 13 August 2010 14:23:51 Wietse Venema wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Ram:
Mail in plain text format , mime encoded message
OK!
Currenlty I get 40/s - 45/s
That sounds normal. Any filtering (in these cases you should inject in
a way that by
On Friday 13 August 2010 14:23:51 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > * Ram :
> > > Mail in plain text format , mime encoded message
> >
> > OK!
> >
> > > Currenlty I get 40/s - 45/s
> >
> > That sounds normal. Any filtering (in these cases you should inject in
> > a way that bypasses
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Ram :
>
> > Mail in plain text format , mime encoded message
>
> OK!
>
> > Currenlty I get 40/s - 45/s
> That sounds normal. Any filtering (in these cases you should inject in
> a way that bypasses and filters)
> > But I want it to be atleast 100/s
>
> Two machineS?
> re
* Ram :
> Mail in plain text format , mime encoded message
OK!
> Currenlty I get 40/s - 45/s
That sounds normal. Any filtering (in these cases you should inject in
a way that bypasses and filters)
> But I want it to be atleast 100/s
Two machineS?
relay boxes
> Delivery is not at all an issue
Hi ,
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 09:39 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Ram :
> > We have a requirement to send some research analysis mails as quickly as
> > possible.
> >
> >
> >
> > Everyday after the data is available my app generates the mails in eml
> > format in a directory.
>
> What is e
* Ram :
> We have a requirement to send some research analysis mails as quickly as
> possible.
>
>
>
> Everyday after the data is available my app generates the mails in eml
> format in a directory.
What is eml format?
> Currently I have a perl script that makes parallel smtp connections on
>
We have a requirement to send some research analysis mails as quickly as
possible.
Everyday after the data is available my app generates the mails in eml
format in a directory.
These are personalized mails with attachments and have to reach the
recipients "instantly" ( in my customers lingo ...
21 matches
Mail list logo
