Re: Small Enhancement Request

2014-10-13 Thread Emmanuel Fusté
Le 10/10/2014 06:40, Ronald F. Guilmette a écrit : In message <20141010030256.gw13...@mournblade.imrryr.org>, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:28:52AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: What happens if in fact the matching rules specified in the access(5) man page resulted in

Re: Small Enhancement Request

2014-10-09 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <20141010030256.gw13...@mournblade.imrryr.org>, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:28:52AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > >> What happens if in fact the matching rules specified in the access(5) >> man page resulted in matching _multiple_ things at the same prior

Re: Small Enhancement Request

2014-10-09 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:28:52AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > What happens if in fact the matching rules specified in the access(5) > man page resulted in matching _multiple_ things at the same priority/ > precedence level? For example, what if I had the following table: > > domain.tld

Re: Small Enhancement Request

2014-10-09 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <20141009163728.gt13...@mournblade.imrryr.org>, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:29:41AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> >> In message <32139_1412843719_543648C7_32139_3580_1_543648C6.9050308@external >.th >> alesgroup.com>, =?windows-1252?Q?Emmanuel_Fust=E9?=

Re: Small Enhancement Request

2014-10-09 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:29:41AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > In message > <32139_1412843719_543648c7_32139_3580_1_543648c6.9050...@external.th > alesgroup.com>, =?windows-1252?Q?Emmanuel_Fust=E9?= > wrote: > > >Le 09/10/2014 07:43, Ronald F. Guilmette a =E9crit : > > > >Do you trie

Re: Small Enhancement Request

2014-10-09 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <32139_1412843719_543648c7_32139_3580_1_543648c6.9050...@external.th alesgroup.com>, =?windows-1252?Q?Emmanuel_Fust=E9?= wrote: >Le 09/10/2014 07:43, Ronald F. Guilmette a =E9crit : > >Do you tried multiple PREPEND result for the same pattern in an access >table (or a table for each

Re: Small Enhancement Request

2014-10-09 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <3jd99m4nwtzj...@spike.porcupine.org>, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: >Ronald F. Guilmette: >> >> This is a request for a very minor change to the semantics of the >> PREPEND result that can be returned from policy servers >> and/or from specific entries within an acces

Re: Small Enhancement Request

2014-10-09 Thread Wietse Venema
Ronald F. Guilmette: > > This is a request for a very minor change to the semantics of the > PREPEND result that can be returned from policy servers > and/or from specific entries within an access(5) lookup table. > > It would be maximally convenient if the subject could be > interpolated in th

Re: Small Enhancement Request

2014-10-09 Thread Emmanuel Fusté
Le 09/10/2014 07:43, Ronald F. Guilmette a écrit : This is a request for a very minor change to the semantics of the PREPEND result that can be returned from policy servers and/or from specific entries within an access(5) lookup table. It would be maximally convenient if the subject could be i

Small Enhancement Request

2014-10-08 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
This is a request for a very minor change to the semantics of the PREPEND result that can be returned from policy servers and/or from specific entries within an access(5) lookup table. It would be maximally convenient if the subject could be interpolated in the following trivial way: Any