On 5 Apr 2019, at 09:11, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Note that you SHOULD NOT ultimately refuse email on SPF softfail,
> but greylisting would be OK, if you find it meets your needs.
Is grey listing still effective? I know when I stopped using it it was not
doing much of anything and I can't imagin
or), eventually it will either be rejected by a following
rule or greylisted by the final policy check.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: April 5, 2019 11:20 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: SPF and Greylisting
st...@dou
On April 5, 2019 2:55:38 PM UTC, st...@douville.net wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>policyd-spf and postgrey are implemented and working.
>
>
>
>With exim, I was able to check the spf result and greylist upon
>receiving a
>certain result. I'm using Mail_From_pass_restriction = mfrom_passed_spf
>in
>policy-
st...@douville.net:
> Hi,
>
> policyd-spf and postgrey are implemented and working.
>
> With exim, I was able to check the spf result and greylist upon receiving a
> certain result. I'm using Mail_From_pass_restriction = mfrom_passed_spf in
> policy-spf.conf.
>
> Is there any way I can defer or gre
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 10:55:38AM -0400, st...@douville.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> policyd-spf and postgrey are implemented and working.
>
> Is there any way I can defer or greylist based on an spf result of Softfail?
Yes, by having the policy service return a 4XX response. Postfix
will do whatever
Hi,
policyd-spf and postgrey are implemented and working.
With exim, I was able to check the spf result and greylist upon receiving a
certain result. I'm using Mail_From_pass_restriction = mfrom_passed_spf in
policy-spf.conf.
Is there any way I can defer or greylist based on an spf res
On 26.09.2010 13:24, Michal Bruncko wrote:
Hello list
I am using postfix (v 2.7.0) with sender policy framework
(postfix-policyd-spf-perl-2.001) and greylisting (postgrey-1.32) with
following configuration:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
check_policy_service unix:private/policy
check_
tically
>>> forwarded to mailboxes. My idea lies on principle, that if sender have
>>> valid SPF record, there is no need to greylist (and delaying mail
>>> receiving), but... SPF and greylisting are only one part of mail
>>> checking (checking directly in smtpd_re
. My idea lies on principle, that if sender have
valid SPF record, there is no need to greylist (and delaying mail
receiving), but... SPF and greylisting are only one part of mail
checking (checking directly in smtpd_recipient_restrictions in postfix).
I am using amavis with SA, viruschecking and
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/29/2010 4:03 AM:
> I mean automatically accepted by postfix, but not automatically
> forwarded to mailboxes. My idea lies on principle, that if sender have
> valid SPF record, there is no need to greylist (and delaying mail
> receiving), but... SPF and
ed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
Maybe I misunderstood the OP's use of the term "automatically accepted".
I mean automatically accepted by postfix, but not automatically
forwarded to mailboxes. My idea lies on principle, that if sender have
Mikael Bak put forth on 9/28/2010 4:25 AM:
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Mikael Bak put forth on 9/27/2010 6:18 AM:
>>> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
> It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
> will be automatically
Henrik K put forth on 9/28/2010 12:28 AM:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:12:01PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>>
>>> Snowshoe spam will most probably pass greylisting too. Better not
>>> clutter greylisting database with useless things. Have the blacklists
>>> block'em instead.
>>
>> I don't follow y
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Mikael Bak put forth on 9/27/2010 6:18 AM:
>> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
>>>
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
>>> If I
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:12:01PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >
> > Snowshoe spam will most probably pass greylisting too. Better not
> > clutter greylisting database with useless things. Have the blacklists
> > block'em instead.
>
> I don't follow your logic here. Yes, most snowshoe is sent
Le 27/09/2010 22:12, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Mikael Bak put forth on 9/27/2010 6:18 AM:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
Le 27/09/2010 00:30, junkyardma...@frontier.com a écrit :
Which makes their domain an easy target for block lists.
http://www.spamhaus.org/query/dbl?domain=takeprettypictures.net
I doubt they were listed becase of their spf record.
but anyway, that would be "coming late to the race" again. sp
Mikael Bak put forth on 9/27/2010 6:18 AM:
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
>>
>>> It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
>>> will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
>>
>> If I may be blunt: this is a
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
>
>> It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
>> will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
>
> If I may be blunt: this is a really dumb idea. Many, maybe all,
> snowshoe sp
to have that confirmed.
--
Stan
> --
> From: "mouss"
> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 1:38 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: SPF and greylisting conditioning
>
>> Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
>>> Michal Bruncko put
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:49:40AM +0200, Michal Bruncko wrote:
> Hello
>
> Thank you for pointing me. It was just my quick idea but as you
> wrote, perhaps many spammers have valid spf records and thus, my
> spam checking will be less spam resistant.
I have no problem not GREYLISTING things that
Hello
Thank you for pointing me. It was just my quick idea but as you wrote,
perhaps many spammers have valid spf records and thus, my spam checking
will be less spam resistant.
and Michael, thank you for your hint.
On 26. 9. 2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/
Which makes their domain an easy target for block lists.
http://www.spamhaus.org/query/dbl?domain=takeprettypictures.net
--
From: "mouss"
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 1:38 PM
To:
Subject: Re: SPF and greylisting conditioning
Le
Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 23:46, mouss a écrit :
> Le 26/09/2010 23:28, fakessh a écrit :
> > Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 22:38, mouss a écrit :
> >>Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> >>> Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
> It is possible in some way to con
Le 26/09/2010 23:28, fakessh a écrit :
Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 22:38, mouss a écrit :
Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with
Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 22:38, mouss a écrit :
> Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> > Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
> >> It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
> >> will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
Le 26/09/2010 12:08, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
If I may be blunt: this is a really dumb idea. Many, maybe all,
On 09/26/10 05:24, Michal Bruncko wrote:
> Hello list
>
> I am using postfix (v 2.7.0) with sender policy framework
> (postfix-policyd-spf-perl-2.001) and greylisting (postgrey-1.32) with
> following configuration:
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> ...
> check_policy_service unix:private
Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:
> It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
> will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?
If I may be blunt: this is a really dumb idea. Many, maybe all,
snowshoe spammers have valid SPF records. T
Hello list
I am using postfix (v 2.7.0) with sender policy framework
(postfix-policyd-spf-perl-2.001) and greylisting (postgrey-1.32) with
following configuration:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
check_policy_service unix:private/policy
check_policy_service unix:/var/spool/postfix/postg
30 matches
Mail list logo
