Henrik K put forth on 9/28/2010 12:28 AM:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:12:01PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>>
>>> Snowshoe spam will most probably pass greylisting too. Better not
>>> clutter greylisting database with useless things. Have the blacklists
>>> block'em instead.
>>
>> I don't follow your logic here.  Yes, most snowshoe is sent from real
>> MTAs, not bots, so greylisting won't stop it.  However, dnsbls and local
>> block lists aren't very effective against snowshoe either, although
>> Spamhaus DBL is getting much better WRT snowshoe.  I have a local
>> snowshoe cidr table I've been building for 2 years and it works rather
>> well as I see maybe 1 snowshoe in the inbox every two weeks or so.
>> However, most people probably don't have such a local snowshoe blocking
>> list.
> 
> Umm, what's YOUR logic here? Greylisting won't stop it, dnsbls won't stop
> it? So I guess it's ok to blindly greylist stuff in case it "happens" to
> stop it?

Of course I'm not advocating folks blindly greylist.  I promote
super-selective greylisting, and have many times on this list.  The
point I was making is that SPF is not a solution for making a reject/ok
determination as an isolated smtpd test.  It's only useful for scoring
systems.  Greylisting in isolation won't stop snowshoe either.  Again,
it is useful in blocking snowhoe if used in a scoring system such as SA.

>>> So OP's request is valid IMO.
>>
>> Shooting mail straight into the inbox based on an SPF pass is not a
>> valid strategy, but a recipe for more spam in the inbox.  SPF is
>> properly used in a scoring system within a policy daemon or external
>> content filter such as SA, same as DKIM etc are.
> 
> Shooting mail straight into inbox? At some point you seemed to understand
> the original question, but again you seen to have missed the point? He was
> asking to bypass greylisting, which is fine. How does that make it STRAIGHT
> into inbox?

Michal Bruncko put forth on 9/26/2010 4:24 AM:

> It is possible in some way to configure postfix, that SPF Passed mails
> will be automatically accepted with postfix without greylisting?

Maybe I misunderstood the OP's use of the term "automatically accepted".

-- 
Stan


Reply via email to