Re: SMTPUTF8 usage

2015-08-20 Thread Postfix User
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 19:01:48 +0200, Mark Martinec stated: > Michael Ströder wrote: > > Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8? > > I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not. > > Google does support SMTPUTF8 : > > > $ host -t mx gmail.com > gmai

Re: SMTPUTF8 usage

2015-08-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Michael Ströder wrote: Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8? I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not. Google does support SMTPUTF8 : $ host -t mx gmail.com gmail.com mail is handled by 20 alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com. gmail.com mail is

Re: SMTPUTF8 usage

2015-08-20 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Mike Cardwell : * on the Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 05:36:38PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: What mail products are SMTPUTF8-compliant at this time? will it ever be needed ?, with idn domains it allready encoded into 7bit, is postfix translate this to utf8 ?, dont know here since thunde

Re: SMTPUTF8 usage

2015-08-20 Thread Michael Ströder
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: > Michael Str?der: >> So I interpret your question it as an answer: >> SMTPUTF8 is currently not widely used. ;-) > > 10 years ago, IPv6 implementation was driven by the concern that > everyone was going to suffer from unavailable IP addresses. > > SMTP

Re: SMTPUTF8 usage

2015-08-20 Thread Mike Cardwell
* on the Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 05:36:38PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: >> What mail products are SMTPUTF8-compliant at this time? > will it ever be needed ?, with idn domains it allready encoded into 7bit, > is postfix translate this to utf8 ?, dont know here since thunderbird works > with idn dom

Re: SMTPUTF8 usage

2015-08-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Michael Str?der: > wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: > > Michael Str?der: > >> Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8? > >> I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not. > >> > >> Given that e.g. SUSE Linux builds of postfix are currently no

Re: SMTPUTF8 usage

2015-08-20 Thread Benny Pedersen
On August 20, 2015 2:48:33 PM wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8? I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not. Given that e.g. SUSE Linux builds of postfix are currently not linked to libicu I assu

Re: SMTPUTF8 usage

2015-08-20 Thread Michael Ströder
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: > Michael Str?der: >> Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8? >> I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not. >> >> Given that e.g. SUSE Linux builds of postfix are currently not linked to >> libicu I assum

Re: SMTPUTF8 usage

2015-08-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Michael Str?der: > HI! > > Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8? > I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not. > > Given that e.g. SUSE Linux builds of postfix are currently not linked to > libicu I assume that SMTPUTF8 is currently not widely u

SMTPUTF8 usage

2015-08-20 Thread Michael Ströder
HI! Does anybody here have experience with current usage of SMTPUTF8? I have a discussion whether that's already used in the wild or not. Given that e.g. SUSE Linux builds of postfix are currently not linked to libicu I assume that SMTPUTF8 is currently not widely used. How about other platforms?