Re: SMTP sessions

2009-02-03 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 02:21:31AM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote: > > There is no evidence that sender-side connection re-use has any material > > impact on your queues. If you do want to enforce such limits, they should > > be applied selectively to just IP sources with poor "reputations". > > I

Re: SMTP sessions

2009-02-03 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Thanks Viktor, >> 1) Once a client (or another MTA) establish a TCP connection with >> listening port bounded by the SMTP daemon of Postfix, could happen that >> more then one email messages are sent over that TCP connection, before >> it >> is closed? > > Sure this is possible, but it is unlik

Re: SMTP sessions

2009-02-03 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:59:37PM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote: > Returning to my question, I'm trying to understand: > > 1) Once a client (or another MTA) establish a TCP connection with > listening port bounded by the SMTP daemon of Postfix, could happen that > more then one email messages ar

Re: SMTP sessions

2009-02-03 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Victor, >> >> I fear that the problem is that for each session I can have an >> unsettled >> >> number of messages sent over that session (It could be happen? If >> yes, >> >> It could be depend on MTA settings?) other then an unsettled size of >> >> SMTP traffic (which it determs the latency of

Re: SMTP sessions

2009-02-03 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:10:50PM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote: > >> I fear that the problem is that for each session I can have an unsettled > >> number of messages sent over that session (It could be happen? If yes, > >> It could be depend on MTA settings?) other then an unsettled size of > >>

RE: SMTP sessions

2009-02-03 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Hi, >>> > I have a mail gateway system that consists of several >>> > Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer. >>> > >>> > I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions >>> that >>> >

RE: SMTP sessions

2009-02-01 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Hello, >> > I have a mail gateway system that consists of several >> > Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer. >> > >> > I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions >> that >> > every server has to ma

RE: SMTP sessions

2009-01-29 Thread Rocco Scappatura
> > I have a mail gateway system that consists of several > > Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer. > > > > I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions > that > > every server has to manage. > > New connections

Re: SMTP sessions

2009-01-28 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:39:01PM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote: > I have a mail gateway system that consists of several > Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer. > > I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions that > every server has

SMTP sessions

2009-01-28 Thread Rocco Scappatura
Hello. I have a mail gateway system that consists of several Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer. I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions that every server has to manage. But, even if the session is perfectly balanced, I see that the average

Re: Maimum number of SMTP sessions allowed

2008-11-05 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Sriram Nyshadham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi All, > > Can someone please let me know which parameter sets the maximum number of > SMTP sessions in main.cf? default_process_limit OR the explicit setting in master.cf (for either smtp or smtpd) -- Ralf Hildebrandt

Maimum number of SMTP sessions allowed

2008-11-05 Thread Sriram Nyshadham
Hi All, Can someone please let me know which parameter sets the maximum number of SMTP sessions in main.cf? Thanks, Sri.