On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 02:21:31AM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> > There is no evidence that sender-side connection re-use has any material
> > impact on your queues. If you do want to enforce such limits, they should
> > be applied selectively to just IP sources with poor "reputations".
>
> Indeed, it would be nice to have a tool that assigns a poor reputation to
> an IP source that impact on the queues.. Maybe one of these tool could be
> a Policyd server? Simply imposing a quota on the number of messages that
> could be sent in a unit of time? Or there exists some of more refined, for
> what you know?
No, it would be nice to have to tools that assign fewer resources to
senders with poor reputations, but just sending you a lot of legitimate
mail is not sufficient cause.
I still don't see why you believe that connection re-use by high-volume
senders is the cause of the imbalance you observe.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
