Re: SMTP-source

2019-03-07 Thread Bill Cole
On 7 Mar 2019, at 17:43, Latin Bishop wrote: I did localhost 25 No, the way you wrote it, that's an argument to the -M option: the EHLO name. See http://www.postfix.org/smtp-source.1.html On Mar 7, 2019, at 5:37 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:24:38PM

Re: SMTP-source

2019-03-07 Thread Wietse Venema
Latin Bishop: > > smtp-source -s 20 -l 5120 -m 100 -M localhost:25 -m 100 -f pi@foo -t > soydepr@foo As documented in the usage message, localhost:25 goes AFTER the options. Wietse

Re: SMTP-source

2019-03-07 Thread Latin Bishop
Ok this helped Thanks http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/smtp-source-smtp-sink-howto-td36350.html > On Mar 7, 2019, at 5:37 PM, Viktor Dukhovni > wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:24:38PM -0500, Latin Bishop wrote: >> >> $ smtp-source -s 20 -l 5120 -m 100 -

Re: SMTP-source

2019-03-07 Thread Latin Bishop
I did localhost 25 > On Mar 7, 2019, at 5:37 PM, Viktor Dukhovni > wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:24:38PM -0500, Latin Bishop wrote: >> >> $ smtp-source -s 20 -l 5120 -m 100 -M localhost:25 -m 100 -f pi@foo -t >> soydepr@foo >> smtp-source: fa

Re: SMTP-source

2019-03-07 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:24:38PM -0500, Latin Bishop wrote: > > $ smtp-source -s 20 -l 5120 -m 100 -M localhost:25 -m 100 -f pi@foo -t > soydepr@foo > smtp-source: fatal: usage: smtp-source -cdLNov -s sess -l msglen -m msgs -C > count > -M myhostname -f from -t to -r rcp

SMTP-source

2019-03-07 Thread Latin Bishop
smtp-source -s 20 -l 5120 -m 100 -M localhost:25 -m 100 -f pi@foo -t soydepr@foo smtp-source: fatal: usage: smtp-source -cdLNov -s sess -l msglen -m msgs -C count -M myhostname -f from -t to -r rcptcount -R delay -w delay host[:port] Where foo is my domain getting fatal usage and bad host

Re: smtp-source time out?

2015-09-08 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:14:38PM -0400, Homer Wilson Smith wrote: > I am using smtp-source to query whether machines are properly up by > relaying mail through them to a buddy server that beeps me if 3 relays > in a row fail. Probably not the best tool for the job. You might t

Re: smtp-source time out?

2015-09-08 Thread Noel Jones
On 9/8/2015 2:14 PM, Homer Wilson Smith wrote: > > Dear Gentle Folk, > > I am using smtp-source to query whether machines are properly > up by > relaying mail through them to a buddy server that beeps me if 3 relays > in a row fail. > > When a target

smtp-source time out?

2015-09-08 Thread Homer Wilson Smith
Dear Gentle Folk, I am using smtp-source to query whether machines are properly up by relaying mail through them to a buddy server that beeps me if 3 relays in a row fail. When a target machine fails, the machine running smtp-source hangs at the perl/shell call to smtp-source

Re: smtp-source/smtp-sink howto

2009-06-17 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 03:44:22PM +0530, Rajkumar S wrote: > I was googling to check if there are any howtos to setup > smtp-source/smtp-sink to test smtp performance, but there are none and > after a quick dig through the man page and another article at > postfixmail.com [http://pos

smtp-source/smtp-sink howto

2009-06-17 Thread Rajkumar S
Hi, I was googling to check if there are any howtos to setup smtp-source/smtp-sink to test smtp performance, but there are none and after a quick dig through the man page and another article at postfixmail.com [http://postfixmail.com/blog/?p=218] I figured that out. I am posting the commands here

Re: smtp-source missimg MIME-Version header

2009-04-23 Thread Wietse Venema
Jan C.: > Hello, > I'm using smtp-source as a test smtp-client and I've realized that it > is not adding the "MIME-Version: 1.0" to the generated email. Hence, > some email clients do not display the received message correctly. My > suggestion would be to

smtp-source missimg MIME-Version header

2009-04-23 Thread Jan C.
Hello, I'm using smtp-source as a test smtp-client and I've realized that it is not adding the "MIME-Version: 1.0" to the generated email. Hence, some email clients do not display the received message correctly. My suggestion would be to add the following line in the smtp-s