Just bumping this :)On ons, 2018-08-22 at 14:34 +, jonat...@selea.se wrote:
>
> Some background:
> We have an Exchange 2013 server that do not seems capable of setting
> a Return-Path header when a user has Autoreply on.
> For example, I am mailing "u...@company.com&q
Some background:
We have an Exchange 2013 server that do not seems capable of setting a
Return-Path header when a user has Autoreply on.
For example, I am mailing "u...@company.com" and that user has an
Autoreply/OOTO on his/her account, exchange sends an Auto
return-path already
matches the destination address of the mail.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13 Februar 2014 um 10:46:15 Uhr
Von: template.mob...@gmx.de
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Entries in sender_bcc_maps and the return-path header
Hi,
i'm using postf
and can help us.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13 Februar 2014 um 11:16:35 Uhr
Von: "Mark Goodge"
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: Entries in sender_bcc_maps and the return-path header
On 13/02/2014 09:46, template.mob...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
&
ne of our employees to be copied to a central mail account.
Since a few month our mail provider delivers us mails that are
addressed to one of our employees, where the return-path header ist
set to the mail address of the receiving employee. The mail is now
copied to our central outgoing account. We
Am 13.02.2014 10:46, schrieb template.mob...@gmx.de:
> How does the sender_bcc_maps mechanism exactly works? Does it
> react on mail body header fields like return-path? Is it in
> detailed documented somewhere? Can we prevent sender_bcc_maps
> from reacting on the return-path field?
which fie
mail account. Since a few month our
mail provider delivers us mails that are addressed to one of our employees,
where the return-path header ist set to the mail address of the receiving
employee. The mail is now copied to our central outgoing account. We don't want
that.
How does the sende
jvanb:
> I am really sorry to bother you with this question. I am totally new at
> postfix and would really appreciate a little help.
> I have read the manuals and added sender_canonical_maps=n...@example.com to
> my master.cf file and reloaded postfix. But the return-path is still set to
> the sen
you tell me what I am doing wrong.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Return-Path-header-tp8019p64243.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:09:44PM -0300, Alexandre Pires wrote:
> Thanks Viktor, but how can I set envelop sender address in postfix ?
With SMTP:
EHLO
MAIL FROM:
RCPT TO:
RCPT TO:
DATA
Message-Headers:
Message Body
.
On the comm
Thanks Viktor, but how can I set envelop sender address in postfix ?
Thanks
Alexandre
- Original Message -
From: "Victor Duchovni"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: Return-path header
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:06:34PM -0300, Alexandre Pires
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:06:34PM -0300, Alexandre Pires wrote:
> Hi Guys, I need to set the return-path header of all my outgoing mail with an
> specific e-mail address Is there any way to do this with postfix ?
Set the envelope sender address. There is no "Return-Path" in tra
Hi Guys, I need to set the return-path header of all my outgoing mail with an
specific e-mail address Is there any way to do this with postfix ?
Thanks
Alexandre
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i have a question, about return-path header in emails.
> >
> > Can i configure postfix to don't override this tag if it is alredy present?
No. The Return-Path: header is added at the time of FINAL delivery.
>
Le Vendredi 11 Décembre 2009 16:14:43, Giovanni Mancuso a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> i have a question, about return-path header in emails.
>
> Can i configure postfix to don't override this tag if it is alredy present?
>
> Thanks
Regarding this question, I have other. Dont
Giovanni Mancuso:
> Hi,
>
> i have a question, about return-path header in emails.
>
> Can i configure postfix to don't override this tag if it is alredy present?
Postfix removes this header (it should not be present) and prepends
it on final delivery.
This is the envelope
Giovanni Mancuso a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> i have a question, about return-path header in emails.
>
> Can i configure postfix to don't override this tag if it is alredy present?
>
it's not a tag and it should not be "already present". this header is
added at d
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:14:43PM +0100, Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
> i have a question, about return-path header in emails.
>
> Can i configure postfix to don't override this tag if it is alredy present?
No.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies
Hi,
i have a question, about return-path header in emails.
Can i configure postfix to don't override this tag if it is alredy present?
Thanks
Victor Duchovni:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:34:11PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > The Postfix LMTP server does not perform final delivery.
>
> That's Postfix LMTP *client* of course. If Postfix had an LMTP server
> that deposited mail into a store of some sort, that could indeed be
> final
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:34:11PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The Postfix LMTP server does not perform final delivery.
That's Postfix LMTP *client* of course. If Postfix had an LMTP server
that deposited mail into a store of some sort, that could indeed be
final delivery. This said, Postfix ha
The Postfix LMTP server does not perform final delivery. You are
welcome to provide pointers to the email RFCs that say that Postfix
is nevertheless responsible for adding final delivery message
headers.
The lmtp_assume_final feature does not make Postfix responsible
for final delivery. It modifie
> return-path is added upon final delivery.
>
> Wietse
Thank you for the answer. So do you think it should be done by LDA (dspam,
or dovecot deliver)? Or is there any point to change postfix daemon's
behavior by option like "lmtp_assume_final=yes"?
Alex.
return-path is added upon final delivery.
Wietse
s use dovecot
deliver for delivering mail to maildir.
Problem: there is no "Return-Path" header at all in message in this way.
As I understand postfix does not set "Return-path", because lmtp is
usually used for mail filters with reinjecting mail to postfix again.
I found only o
25 matches
Mail list logo
