On 3/5/2015 4:13 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> But since you state the origin is a mail list manager, it's likely
>> the
>> message is stuck in the list manager software and not in postfix.
>
> Noel,
>
> And the MLM will likely keep sending it for a few d
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Noel Jones wrote:
But since you state the origin is a mail list manager, it's likely the
message is stuck in the list manager software and not in postfix.
Noel,
And the MLM will likely keep sending it for a few days. I've commented out
that body_checks rule and hope that
On 3/5/2015 12:10 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> Please send all of the log entries for this message, unedited
>> except for
>> the recipient name.
>
> Noel,
>
> I was the intended recipient; the sender was a mail list manager:
>
> Mar 2 11:14:37 salmo p
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Wietse Venema wrote:
Agian, one message (948EC9926E) is rejected by body_checks, and a
corresponding bounce message (A6C4E99275) is delivered to the sender.
There is no evidence of mail being stuck in the queue. Postfix works as
expected.
Wietse,
Make sense now to me; t
Rich Shepard:
> Mar 5 08:33:50 salmo postfix/pickup[8043]: 948EC9926E: uid=0 from=
> Mar 5 08:33:50 salmo postfix/cleanup[8825]: 948EC9926E: message-id=<201503
> 05163350.948ec99...@salmo.appl-ecosys.com>
> Mar 5 08:33:50 salmo postfix/cleanup[8825]: 948EC9926E: reject: body Mar
> 4 04:40:03 sa
Rich Shepard:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Did we ever confirm where the "stuck" email message comes from?
>
> Mar 3 05:50:32 salmo postfix/pickup[11492]: 241BB9929C: uid=0 from=
> Mar 3 05:50:32 salmo postfix/cleanup[13188]: 241BB9929C: message-id=<20150
> 303135032.241bb99
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Rich Shepard wrote:
Did we ever confirm where the "stuck" email message comes from?
There's nothing about this message in maillog or maillog.1, only in
maillog.2 from Tuesday.
Using a different string for grep finds this in today's /var/log/maillog:
Mar 5 08:33:50 s
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Wietse Venema wrote:
Did we ever confirm where the "stuck" email message comes from?
Mar 3 05:50:32 salmo postfix/pickup[11492]: 241BB9929C: uid=0 from=
Mar 3 05:50:32 salmo postfix/cleanup[13188]: 241BB9929C: message-id=<20150
303135032.241bb99...@salmo.appl-ecosys.com>
Did we ever confirm where the "stuck" email message comes from?
Here is an example of local submission:
Mar 5 01:05:04 spike postfix/pickup[95787]: 3kyM4J5pqmzJrQ2: uid=1001
from=
Mar 5 01:05:04 spike postfix/cleanup[95928]: 3kyM4J5pqmzJrQ2:
message-id=<3kym4j5pqmzj...@spike.porcupine.org>
H
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Wietse Venema wrote:
Can you do "postfix reload" AND LOOK IN THE MAIL LOGFILE. There will
be a record like this:
Mar 5 10:10:24 salmo postfix/postfix-script[11000]: refreshing the Postfix
mail system
Mar 5 10:10:24 salmo postfix/master[21792]: reload -- version 2.11.4,
c
Rich Shepard:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Last chance: do you have "receive_override_options" in those files?
>
>No.
>
> > Otherwise, either your Postfix configuration files are in a different
> > place (do "postfix reload" and see the real pathname in the mail logfile)
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Wietse Venema wrote:
Last chance: do you have "receive_override_options" in those files?
No.
Otherwise, either your Postfix configuration files are in a different
place (do "postfix reload" and see the real pathname in the mail logfile)
or your Postfix has been changed.
Rich Shepard:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > That is not a Postfix configuration file. Try:
> > grep internal_mail_filter_classes /etc/postfix/main.cf
> > /etc/postfix/master.cf
>
>Not found in either one.
>
> > Do you have receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks in
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Wietse Venema wrote:
That is not a Postfix configuration file. Try:
grep internal_mail_filter_classes /etc/postfix/main.cf /etc/postfix/master.cf
Not found in either one.
Do you have receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks in main.cf
or master.cf?
No; in neit
Rich Shepard:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > If this is handled by the pickup daemon, then it is a local submission.
>
> Wietse,
>
>Yes, this is submitted locally.
>
> > When a local submission is rejected by header/body_checks then
> > it should be returned to sender, not
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Wietse Venema wrote:
If this is handled by the pickup daemon, then it is a local submission.
Wietse,
Yes, this is submitted locally.
When a local submission is rejected by header/body_checks then
it should be returned to sender, not get stuck in the queue.
The message
Wietse Venema:
> Rich Shepard:
> >For the past few days an incoming message rejected by a body_checks rule
> > has been stuck somewhere and prevents the daily logwatch report being mailed
> > to me. No subdirectory in /var/spool/postfix/defer/ or ../deferred/ contains
> > a file and I don't kno
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Noel Jones wrote:
Please send all of the log entries for this message, unedited except for
the recipient name.
Noel,
I was the intended recipient; the sender was a mail list manager:
Mar 2 11:14:37 salmo postfix/cleanup[4816]: B52909929A: reject: body browse
and edit d
Rich Shepard:
>For the past few days an incoming message rejected by a body_checks rule
> has been stuck somewhere and prevents the daily logwatch report being mailed
> to me. No subdirectory in /var/spool/postfix/defer/ or ../deferred/ contains
> a file and I don't know where to find this so I
On 3/5/2015 8:47 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> For the past few days an incoming message rejected by a
> body_checks rule
> has been stuck somewhere and prevents the daily logwatch report
> being mailed
> to me. No subdirectory in /var/spool/postfix/defer/ or ../deferred/
> contains
> a file and I do
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
postsuper -d QUEUEID
Leonardo,
The mail queue is empty and there is nothing in deferred. I interpret the
message
as a notice of message rejection, not a message itself. It's an unmatched
entry in logwatch. In pflogsumm there's a record of it
On 05/03/15 11:47, Rich Shepard wrote:
888BE9926E: sender delivery status notification: 25C8B99275
40A9099270: reject: body Mar 3 04:40:03 salmo postfix/cleanup[11578]:
595889929F: reject: body Mar 2 11:14:37 salmo postfix/cleanup[4816]:
B52909929A: reject: body browse and edit data featur
For the past few days an incoming message rejected by a body_checks rule
has been stuck somewhere and prevents the daily logwatch report being mailed
to me. No subdirectory in /var/spool/postfix/defer/ or ../deferred/ contains
a file and I don't know where to find this so I can remove it. The me
23 matches
Mail list logo
