mouss wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Raymond Keller wrote:
/^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$/554 RFC 2821 does not allow
bare address literals.
FYI- This can be shortened a bit more:
/^(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}$/ REJECT RFC 2821 do
Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Raymond Keller wrote:
/^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$/554 RFC 2821 does not allow
bare address literals.
FYI- This can be shortened a bit more:
/^(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}$/ REJECT RFC 2821 does not allow b
Raymond Keller wrote:
Ah. I don't have experience with varieties of server installations,
so my guess was very speculative. However, I would be surprised to
hear if there were _no_ implementations wherein MUAs submit to
Postfix via 25 (despite what MUAs ought to do). And I would be
surprised
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Raymond Keller wrote:
/^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$/554 RFC 2821 does not allow bare
address literals.
FYI- This can be shortened a bit more:
/^(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}$/ REJECT RFC 2821 does not allow bare address
litera
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Raymond Keller wrote:
/^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$/554 RFC 2821 does not allow bare
address literals.
FYI- This can be shortened a bit more:
/^(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}$/ REJECT RFC 2821 does not allow bare address
literals.
Also, I don't see under:
http:
* mouss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20080903 13:14]:
> Raymond Keller wrote:
> >Is the compatibility that is sought by allowing underscores done for
> >the sake of Windows MUAs?
>
> No. This has nothing to do with windows nor with MUAs. you generally
> don't care about the helo used by MUAs. MUAs shou
Raymond Keller wrote:
* Wietse Venema ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20080903 11:35]:
Raymond Keller:
I configured reject_invalid_helo_hostname and was surprised to find
that underscores were permitted. Judging by the source (I'm not
conversant in C), it looks like the author had this comment
regarding
* Wietse Venema ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20080903 11:35]:
> Raymond Keller:
> > I configured reject_invalid_helo_hostname and was surprised to find
> > that underscores were permitted. Judging by the source (I'm not
> > conversant in C), it looks like the author had this comment
> > regarding allowing
Raymond Keller wrote:
I configured reject_invalid_helo_hostname and was surprised to find
that underscores were permitted. Judging by the source (I'm not
conversant in C), it looks like the author had this comment
regarding allowing underscores: "grr.." I feel similarly. Is that
you, Mr. Venem
Raymond Keller:
> I configured reject_invalid_helo_hostname and was surprised to find
> that underscores were permitted. Judging by the source (I'm not
> conversant in C), it looks like the author had this comment
> regarding allowing underscores: "grr.." I feel similarly. Is that
> you, Mr. Ven
10 matches
Mail list logo
