Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Duane Hill wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Raymond Keller wrote:
/^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$/ 554 RFC 2821 does not allow
bare address literals.
FYI- This can be shortened a bit more:
/^(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}$/ REJECT RFC 2821 does not allow bare
address literals.
Forgive me. My head is up my wazoo. Ignore everything below this line.
that said, he should add an "enhanced status" after the 554. some
clients may not like seeing ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES in EHLO response but not
seeing such codes in the command responses.
Also, I don't see under:
http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html
where your action of 554 is valid. You should be using REJECT instead.
-d
-d
