Re: virtual_mailbox_base Question

2009-09-17 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:37:14PM -0500, John Dubchak wrote: > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 15:24 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote: > > > > If you want to reduce security, set the parameter to "/" as documented. > > That's not my goal, so it's not a change I'm willing to introduce. > Also, I wasn't aware

Re: virtual_mailbox_base Question

2009-09-17 Thread John Dubchak
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 15:24 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote: > > If you want to reduce security, set the parameter to "/" as documented. > That's not my goal, so it's not a change I'm willing to introduce. Also, I wasn't aware that I'd be reducing security by doing that, so thanks for pointing that

Re: virtual_mailbox_base Question

2009-09-17 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:18:04PM -0500, John Dubchak wrote: > > > I read the documentation that said the default value for > > > virtual_mailbox_base is blank if it is not present. I wanted to create > > > a more flexible system and decided to change the query in > > > virtual_mailbox_maps to r

Re: virtual_mailbox_base Question

2009-09-17 Thread John Dubchak
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 14:36 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:52:23AM -0500, John Dubchak wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a functioning postfix-2.6.5 upgraded installation running. The > > current setup has > > > > virtual_mailbox_base=/var/spool/virutal_mailboxes > >

Re: virtual_mailbox_base Question

2009-09-17 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:52:23AM -0500, John Dubchak wrote: > Hi, > > I have a functioning postfix-2.6.5 upgraded installation running. The > current setup has > > virtual_mailbox_base=/var/spool/virutal_mailboxes > > and uses postgres to return the remaining portion of the delivery path >