--On Sunday, August 10, 2008 2:31 PM +1000 James Brown
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Quanah.
I am using Mac OS X 10.4.11 for my Postfix and Courier-Auth server.
I'm often running out of resources, despite changing things based on many
google searches!
I do not have either of the files yo
Thanks Quanah.
I am using Mac OS X 10.4.11 for my Postfix and Courier-Auth server.
I'm often running out of resources, despite changing things based on
many google searches!
I do not have either of the files you mention. Should I simply create
them?
Thanks,
James.
On 10/08/2008, at 4:5
--On Saturday, August 09, 2008 8:27 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To help other people who run into this same system-specific gotcha,
would you share the solution with the mailing list? I really can't
explore the gory kernel details of every system myself.
Certainly! :)
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> --On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix runs hundreds of cleanup
> > servers, hundreds of smtpd servers, further-more, if tables are not
> > carefully defined to have identic
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix runs hundreds of cleanup
servers, hundreds of smtpd servers, further-more, if tables are not
carefully defined to have identical values for connection-related
para
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 1:12 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:50:35AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix run
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:50:35AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix runs hundreds of cleanup
> >servers, hundreds of smtpd servers, further-more, if table
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix runs hundreds of cleanup
servers, hundreds of smtpd servers, further-more, if tables are not
carefully defined to have identical values for connection-related
para
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:29:27AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:35 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:02:48PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >
> >>We found that if we are using startTLS with postfix, an
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> --On Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:39 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> >> --On Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:02 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > We found that if we are using startTLS with pos
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:02:48PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> We found that if we are using startTLS with postfix, and heavily load
> postfix, that it Postfix stops working, even though the LDAP server
> continues to accept connections from other clients just fine using
> startTLS. He
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:35 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:02:48PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
We found that if we are using startTLS with postfix, and heavily load
postfix, that it Postfix stops working, even though the LDAP server
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:39 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:02 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We found that if we are using startTLS with postfix, and heavily load
> postfix, that it Postf
13 matches
Mail list logo
