Wietse Venema wrote on 2/17/23 10:26:
D. R. Evans:
I must be doing something particularly obviously stupid, because doing my best
to follow the advice from Wietse in the thread "different treatment for
different From: domains", I have tried everything I can think of, and am
unable to get sender_
D. R. Evans:
> I must be doing something particularly obviously stupid, because doing my best
> to follow the advice from Wietse in the thread "different treatment for
> different From: domains", I have tried everything I can think of, and am
> unable to get sender_dependent_relayhost_maps to actua
On 29 Jul 2019, at 0:56, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 08:14:38PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
>> Now sometimes the same email comes back to MX-E via an *alias* (no From:
>> changes) on MX-3. MX-E will receive the looped back email from MX-3
>> and then decides by its transp
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 08:14:38PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> Now sometimes the same email comes back to MX-E via an *alias* (no From:
> changes) on MX-3. MX-E will receive the looped back email from MX-3
> and then decides by its transport rules that it should send it to MX-I.
>
> Here’s
> On Nov 22, 2018, at 4:32 AM, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
> Found it. Was required to modify smtp_auth to
>
> customer1.de user1:password
> customer2.de user2:password.
Nope:
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl_sender
Generally, with Postfix lookups by email address, the lookup k
Found it. Was required to modify smtp_auth to
customer1.de user1:password
customer2.de user2:password.
Am Do., 22. Nov. 2018 um 10:22 Uhr schrieb Stefan Bauer <
cubew...@googlemail.com>:
> After setting
>
> smtp_sender_dependent_authentication = yes
>
> and adding additional credentials postfix
After setting
smtp_sender_dependent_authentication = yes
and adding additional credentials postfix rejects change with
#root@postgate01:~# nano /etc/postfix/smtp_auth
[securegw.intern]:25user1:password
[securegw.intern]:25user2:password
root@postgate01:~# more /etc/postfix/rela
Thank you!
Am Montag, 5. November 2018 schrieb Wietse Venema :
> Stefan Bauer:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i have:
>> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relayhost_maps
>> smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/smtp_auth
>>
>> more /etc/postfix/relayhost_maps
>> @mydomain.de[smtp.1und1.d
Stefan Bauer:
> Hi,
>
> i have:
> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relayhost_maps
> smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/smtp_auth
>
> more /etc/postfix/relayhost_maps
> @mydomain.de[smtp.1und1.de]:587
> @my2domain.de [smtp.1und1.de]:587
>
> more /etc/postfix/smtp_a
KSB:
> Hi,
> Is it possible to configure sender_dependent_relayhost_maps with
> failover hosts, probably with priorities?
Use smtp_fallback_relay for the safety net.
Wietse
I found the possibility in the Postfix configuration
parameters:*sender_dependent_relayhost_maps (default: empty)*A
sender-dependent override for the global relayhost parameter setting. The
tables are searched by the envelope sender address and @domain. /A lookup
result of DUNNO terminates the sear
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:59:29AM -0700, ebberup wrote:
> I can't make sender_dependent_relayhost_maps default to relayhost when
> trivial-rewrite result is DUNNO.
That's because "DUNNO" is an access(5) keyword, and not a generic
"nothing here" result for all tables.
There is no documentation t
Using the parameter "sender_dependent_default_transport_maps" leads to the
same result as using the paramter "sender_dependent_relayhost_maps". I
think this is the case cause the recipient domain is also part of the
internal domains. Therefore the relay entry defined in the "transport_maps"
is taki
Sebastian Fehrenbacher:
> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps work great when the rcpt to addresses
> domain is not part of the relay_domains. However when both domains - mail
> from and rcpt to - are part of the relay_domains the parameter
> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps is not taking effect. In thi
On 04/21/2013 05:06 PM, awingnut wrote:
On 4/21/2013 10:50 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 04/19/2013 03:17 PM, awingnut wrote:
On 4/19/2013 8:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.04.2013 14:25, schrieb awingnut:
I have a series of user names that need to be relayed through a server
other then the
On 4/21/2013 10:50 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 04/19/2013 03:17 PM, awingnut wrote:
>> On 4/19/2013 8:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 19.04.2013 14:25, schrieb awingnut:
I have a series of user names that need to be relayed through a server
other then the default. It is not clear fr
On 04/19/2013 03:17 PM, awingnut wrote:
On 4/19/2013 8:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.04.2013 14:25, schrieb awingnut:
I have a series of user names that need to be relayed through a server
other then the default. It is not clear from the documentation if wild
cards are allowed but it appear
On 4/19/2013 8:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 19.04.2013 14:25, schrieb awingnut:
>> I have a series of user names that need to be relayed through a server
>> other then the default. It is not clear from the documentation if wild
>> cards are allowed but it appears they are not
> no and wildcha
Reindl Harald:
> Am 19.04.2013 14:25, schrieb awingnut:
> > I have a series of user names that need to be relayed through a server
> > other then the default. It is not clear from the documentation if wild
> > cards are allowed but it appears they are not
>
> no and wildchars in case of mail are g
Am 19.04.2013 14:25, schrieb awingnut:
> I have a series of user names that need to be relayed through a server
> other then the default. It is not clear from the documentation if wild
> cards are allowed but it appears they are not
no and wildchars in case of mail are generally a bad idea
> If
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 04:17:23PM -0400, Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
>
> Dear Gentle Folk,
>
> I wish to relay all mail from our outgoing mail server,
> smtp.lightlink.com, through a default outgoing barracuda, EXCEPT
> mails FROM specified addresses that wish to do large authorized
> mail
Homer Wilson Smith:
> #relayhost =
>
> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relayhost
>
> relayhost file says
>
> * [barracuda.lightlink.com]:25
> frien...@spammer.com :
I don't know what "*" or ":" is supposed to mean. They certainly
are not documented
Hi, Neil,
My confusion lies in the fact that the email client campaign software is
actually initiating a connection to the virtual domain, and sending the
mail to it -- all on the same server, mind you -- then IT sends it out
through the interface with it's virtualized IP address.
I don't se
On 5/23/2011 10:19 AM, Jeffs wrote:
On 5/23/2011 11:06 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
The Received: header is added by the receiving system, not
by your server, and always shows the IP of the connection.
If you want each client to have their own identity, each
client will need its own IP. You can't virt
On 5/23/2011 11:06 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 5/23/2011 9:30 AM, Jeffs wrote:
On 5/23/2011 3:33 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/23/2011 03:35 AM, Jeffs wrote:
Hello All,
Assume the following setup:
Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses
their email campaign software running
On 5/23/2011 9:30 AM, Jeffs wrote:
On 5/23/2011 3:33 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/23/2011 03:35 AM, Jeffs wrote:
Hello All,
Assume the following setup:
Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses
their email campaign software running on Many_Companies.com
and sends out newsl
On 5/23/2011 3:33 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 05/23/2011 03:35 AM, Jeffs wrote:
Hello All,
Assume the following setup:
Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses their
email campaign software running on Many_Companies.com and sends out
newsletters.
A short time later a cli
On 05/23/2011 03:35 AM, Jeffs wrote:
Hello All,
Assume the following setup:
Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses their email
campaign software running on Many_Companies.com and sends out
newsletters.
A short time later a client from def.com logins to Many_Companies.com
I kept the same files, but updated all the binariesthe clause works if the
mail needs to send the mail elsewhere So instead of using relahost it uses
the relay defined in the sender_relay file
When the mail is destined to the main relay then it does normal routine of
looking in transpo
GB GB put forth on 2/8/2011 4:52 PM:
> so if I understand correctly, when I use
> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps transport and relayhost need to be
> empty
GB GB put forth on 2/8/2011 4:10 PM:
> here is the outputthe current version of postfix is 2.3.19
>
> mail_release_date = 20040915
>
When I search for those clauses I come up with the following
address_verify_relayhost = $relayhost
address_verify_transport_maps = $transport_maps
proxy_read_maps = $local_recipient_maps $mydestination
$virtual_alias_maps $virtual_alias_domains $virtual_mailbox_maps
$virtual_mailbox_domains $relay
GB GB:
> postconf -n -c /etc/postfix-hd will render the output I sent in the
> earlier mail
I don't have time for people with hundreds of parameters
in their main.cf file.
You can find out for yourself if the requirements for
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps are met: no transport_maps,
no rel
On 2/8/2011 5:39 PM, GB GB wrote:
postconf -n -c /etc/postfix-hd will render the output I sent in the
earlier mail
regards,
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
GB GB:
here is the outputthe current version of postfix is 2.3.19
I asked for "postconf -n" output.
I di
postconf -n -c /etc/postfix-hd will render the output I sent in the
earlier mail
regards,
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> GB GB:
>> here is the outputthe current version of postfix is 2.3.19
>>
>
> I asked for "postconf -n" output.
>
> I did not ask for hundreds of
GB GB:
> here is the outputthe current version of postfix is 2.3.19
>
I asked for "postconf -n" output.
I did not ask for hundreds of parameter settings.
Wietse
here is the outputthe current version of postfix is 2.3.19
2bounce_notice_recipient = postmaster
access_map_reject_code = 554
address_verify_default_transport = $default_transport
address_verify_local_transport = $local_transport
address_verify_map =
address_verify_negative_cache = yes
address
gbcy...@gmail.com:
> My apologies, the sender_relay contains
> /r...@ltest01.domain.com/ [1.2.3.4]
>
> Regxp is what I will use for this map
Please show COMPLETE postconf -n output. As documented at
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_dependent_relayhost_maps
the sender_dependent_r
My apologies, the sender_relay contains
/r...@ltest01.domain.com/ [1.2.3.4]
Regxp is what I will use for this map
Regards,
On 2011-02-08, at 3:48 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 02/08/2011 08:47 PM, GB GB wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed after configuring sender_dependent_relayhost_maps an
On 02/08/2011 08:47 PM, GB GB wrote:
Hello,
I noticed after configuring sender_dependent_relayhost_maps and
expecting it to forward mail to my listed destination does not work as
expected.
I need sender_dependent_relayhost_maps to forward mail depending what
the the source is.
Our team has spli
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:45:14PM -0400, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:48:33PM -0400, Damon Miller wrote:
> > Hello. I've configured Postfix to relay mail from a specific
> > address to a remote MTA through 'sender_dependent_relayhost_maps'
> > and that works fine. I now want to
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:48:33PM -0400, Damon Miller wrote:
> Hello. I've configured Postfix to relay mail from a specific
> address to a remote MTA through 'sender_dependent_relayhost_maps'
> and that works fine. I now want to BCC an address for messages
> sent by this same user. The most
Yes,
i solved problem using how result_attribute a single-valued attribute.
Thanks
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:57:07AM +0100, Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
>
>
>> result_attribute = domains
>> result_format = [127.0.0.1]:2501
>> expansion_limit = 1
>>
>> But i have:
>> postfi
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:57:07AM +0100, Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
> result_attribute = domains
> result_format = [127.0.0.1]:2501
> expansion_limit = 1
>
> But i have:
> postfix/trivial-rewrite[12577]: warning: dict_ldap_get_values[1]:
> /opt/postfix/etc/ldap/ldap_relaymaps.cf: Expansion limit ex
Zitat von Jerry :
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 20:51:16 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema replied:
Wietse:
You must return a result that satisfies the documented syntax.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.html#relayhost
Wietse, maybe it is something local to my machine; however that URL
yields this result here
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 20:51:16 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema replied:
>Wietse:
>> You must return a result that satisfies the documented syntax.
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.html#relayhost
Wietse, maybe it is something local to my machine; however that URL
yields this result here:
Not Found
The
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Giovanni Mancuso:
> >
> >> I'm trying to configure my postfix to use a different
> >> relayhost if the sender of the email is in ldap.
> >
> > You must return a result that satisfies the documented syntax.
> > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.html#relayhost
On Thu, Dec
Wietse:
> You must return a result that satisfies the documented syntax.
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.html#relayhost
Giovanni Mancuso:
> Thanks for answer.
>
> But, can i configure ldap search to manage multivalue in entry?
See my previous reply, above.
Wietse
Thanks for answer.
But, can i configure ldap search to manage multivalue in entry?
I tried with:
server_host = ldap://x.x.x.x
server_port = 389
search_base = SenderHost=exampleSender,o=AllHost
scope = sub
query_filter = (&(domains=%d)(objectClass=provider))
result_attribute = domains
result_forma
Giovanni Mancuso:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to configure my postfix to use a different relayhost if the
> sender of the email is in ldap.
You must return a result that satisfies the documented syntax.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.html#relayhost
Wietse
On Saturday, June 13, 2009 at 04:25 CEST,
Gerard wrote:
> I still am having a problem getting 'sender_dependent_relaying" to work.
>
> This is a snippet of the sender_relay file:
>
> gmail.com smtp:smtp.gmail.com:587
> yahoo.com smtp:smtp.plus.mail.yahoo.com:587
As documented, @ex
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:25:27PM -0400, Gerard wrote:
> I still am having a problem getting 'sender_dependent_relaying" to work.
>
> This is a snippet of the sender_relay file:
>
> gmail.com smtp:smtp.gmail.com:587
> yahoo.com smtp:smtp.plus.mail.yahoo.com:587
Well, this is transport(
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 07:05:36PM -0300, Jose kojima wrote:
> it i have 200 virtual ips, i need do 200 postmulti instaces ?
>
If you have 200 virtual IPs either you are solving the wrong problem,
or Postfix is not your solution. The only use-case for this I can think
of is "snow-shoe" spam oper
Jose kojima:
> it i have 200 virtual ips, i need do 200 postmulti instaces ?
Why do you need different SOURCE ip addresses.
Wietse
it i have 200 virtual ips, i need do 200 postmulti instaces ?
2009/5/26 Victor Duchovni :
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 06:17:37PM -0300, Jose kojima wrote:
>
>> hi there,
>>
>> i have a problem here, i there multiply ips in my postfix server:
>>
>> eth0 192.168.1.1
>> eth0:1: 192.168.1.2
>> eth0:2: 1
ok,
ill look, thanks,
2009/5/26 Victor Duchovni :
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 06:17:37PM -0300, Jose kojima wrote:
>
>> hi there,
>>
>> i have a problem here, i there multiply ips in my postfix server:
>>
>> eth0 192.168.1.1
>> eth0:1: 192.168.1.2
>> eth0:2: 192.168.1.3
>>
>> i like to send the doma
thanks a lot...
how i can to it with postfix 2.6+ ? there docs about ?
2009/5/26 Brian Evans - Postfix List :
> Jose kojima wrote:
>> hi there,
>>
>> i have a problem here, i there multiply ips in my postfix server:
>>
>> eth0 192.168.1.1
>> eth0:1: 192.168.1.2
>> eth0:2: 192.168.1.3
>>
>> i like
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 06:17:37PM -0300, Jose kojima wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i have a problem here, i there multiply ips in my postfix server:
>
> eth0 192.168.1.1
> eth0:1: 192.168.1.2
> eth0:2: 192.168.1.3
>
> i like to send the domain test.com via 192.168.1.2 source ip, and
> test1.com via 1
Jose kojima wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i have a problem here, i there multiply ips in my postfix server:
>
> eth0 192.168.1.1
> eth0:1: 192.168.1.2
> eth0:2: 192.168.1.3
>
> i like to send the domain test.com via 192.168.1.2 source ip, and
> test1.com via 192.168.1.3. I did read about
> sender_dependen
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Wietse Venema"
To: "Postfix users"
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: Sender_dependent_relayhost_maps table syntax
Wietse Venema:
Gilles Albusac:
> I have a syntax problem in my sender_dependent_relayh
Wietse Venema:
> Gilles Albusac:
> > I have a syntax problem in my sender_dependent_relayhost_maps table (hash
> > table).
> >
> > I would like to add a default relay at the end of the file (the line with
> > *).
> >
> > /etc/postfix/sender_relay =
> > @domain1.com [192.168.1.1]
> > @domain2.c
Gilles Albusac:
> I have a syntax problem in my sender_dependent_relayhost_maps table (hash
> table).
>
> I would like to add a default relay at the end of the file (the line with *).
>
> /etc/postfix/sender_relay =
> @domain1.com [192.168.1.1]
> @domain2.com [192.168.1.2]
> * [192.168.1.3
Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor Duchovni:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:07:28PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
As documented, relayhost takes precedence over
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_dependent_relayhost_maps
My reading of the code in 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6
Richard Wurman wrote:
I think my problem is related to my regular expression syntax. What is
the pcre equivalent to regexp's: /@example\.com$/ ?
I want to match on @billing.domain2.com .. AFAIK there are subtle
differences between pcre and regexp syntax and the most basic stuff
is the same? I'v
I think my problem is related to my regular expression syntax. What is
the pcre equivalent to regexp's: /@example\.com$/ ?
I want to match on @billing.domain2.com .. AFAIK there are subtle
differences between pcre and regexp syntax and the most basic stuff
is the same? I've been trying this in my
Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:07:28PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> > As documented, relayhost takes precedence over
> > sender_dependent_relayhost_maps.
> > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_dependent_relayhost_maps
>
> My reading of the code in 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 is th
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:07:28PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> As documented, relayhost takes precedence over
> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps.
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_dependent_relayhost_maps
My reading of the code in 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 is that sender dependent
relayhost o
> # /etc/postfix/sender_maps.regexp
> /@example\.com$/ [192.168.10.3]
> /./ [192.168.10.5
>
> - do not index a regexp table with postmap.
> - you can use pcre rather than regexp above if your postfix supports pcre
> tables.
Ah I misunderstood the precedence, thinking that relayhost in main.cf
wo
Richard Wurman wrote:
I'm attempting to get sender_dependent_relayhost_maps working on
postfix 2.5.1. What I'm trying to do is this: all mail from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] should be sent out from a different mail server,
because SPF has been set to that IP address. All others should use the
default rela
Wadeegh Hendricks wrote:
I thought I would resend this as it may be old and nobody looking at it,
if not and I am just being ignored then my aplogies :-)
My scenario is as follows:
I have an SMTP server setup to relay all mail to a server on the
internet that does virus and SPAM scanning as w
69 matches
Mail list logo
