On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 09:51:09PM +0100, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> > j...@p27.eu j...@p27.eu
>
> I added it to virtual, where it did not exist.
>
> > and make sure to remove (not include) "virtual" in:
> >
> > propagate_unmatched_extensions = canonical
> >
> > the default setting inc
>> Dovecot has the same setting: recipient_delimiter = +
>> In the logs, is the mail being rejected by postfix or by dovecot
>> after postfix tries to deliver?
> I'm not 100% sure: I suspect dovecot because the error occurs talking
> on the pipe to dovecot.
>
> postfix/pipe[3889979]: A0BCEA0FEB:
On 06/11/2021 23:34, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On 6 Nov 2021, at 3:43 pm, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
>>
>> In main.cf I have set
>>
>> recipient_delimiter = +
>>
>> Reading the docs, I don't see anything else I ought to set for this to
>> work: postfix should first try delivery to jeff+post...@p27
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 07:00:12PM -0400, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> > My expectation is that dovecot is not involved in this issue, but I'm
> > not sure, so I mention anyway that that I have set
> >
> > virtual_transport = dovecot
>
>
> Dovecot has the same setting: recipient_delimiter = +
>
> My expectation is that dovecot is not involved in this issue, but I'm
> not sure, so I mention anyway that that I have set
>
> virtual_transport = dovecot
Dovecot has the same setting: recipient_delimiter = +
In the logs, is the mail being rejected by postfix or by dovecot after postfix
t
> On 6 Nov 2021, at 3:43 pm, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
>
> In main.cf I have set
>
> recipient_delimiter = +
>
> Reading the docs, I don't see anything else I ought to set for this to
> work: postfix should first try delivery to jeff+post...@p27.eu, then
> j...@p27.eu, and this second is known
On 31.07.21 20:55, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Please also provide output from
>
> postconf -P
There is only syslog and submission stuff in postconf -P. The true
problem seems to have been that I didn't delete the verify_cache.db
after changing the virtual alias map.
- Florian.
Florian Hars:
> On 31.07.21 16:10, Florian Hars wrote:
> > I am currently slightly confused by the interaction between
> > recipient_delimiter and virtual_alias_maps.
>
> That interaction may actually not have been the true cause of my
> observations. What I now think happened is that the effects
On 31.07.21 16:10, Florian Hars wrote:
> I am currently slightly confused by the interaction between
> recipient_delimiter and virtual_alias_maps.
That interaction may actually not have been the true cause of my
observations. What I now think happened is that the effects I observed
were caused by
Please also provide output from
postconf -P
I suspect that you have virtual alias mapping disabled in some
message delivery path (with receive_override_options =
no_address_mappings).
Wietse
On 28 Sep 2014, at 09:14 , Wietse Venema wrote:
> When the recipient_delimiter set contains multiple characters (Postfix
> 2.11 and later), a [name] is separated from its extension
> by the first character that matches the recipient_delimiter set.
Thanks, I hadn’t found that as I was re
LuKreme:
> Is there documentation on how recipient_delimiter is treated in 2.11 if there
> is more than one delimiter defined?
>
> recipient_delimiter = +-_
>
> if an email comes to foo-bar_fee+...@domain.tld, is the precedence
> left to right from the definition, right to left from the definiti
Hi Viktor,
TL;DR fixed, case closed.
On 22-01-14 17:18, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 04:59:25PM +0100, Patrick Lists wrote:
On a CentOS 6.5 box with a virtual_mailbox_domains,
virtual_mailbox_maps, virtual_alias_maps setup all accessing
openldap I added in main.cf (and resta
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 04:59:25PM +0100, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On a CentOS 6.5 box with a virtual_mailbox_domains,
> virtual_mailbox_maps, virtual_alias_maps setup all accessing
> openldap I added in main.cf (and restarted postfix afterwards):
>
> recipient_delimiter = +
Anecdotal reporting is
Thanks !
Em 11/12/2011, às 17:46, Wietse Venema escreveu:
> Jose Renato Attab Braga:
>> Hi
>> I need use the address aaa+xyz@domain when I have the only the
>> address aaa@domain.
>> In my main.cf I have recipient_delimiter = +.
>> I use Mysql to emails adress and domains.
>> What do I need to co
Jose Renato Attab Braga:
> Hi
> I need use the address aaa+xyz@domain when I have the only the
> address aaa@domain.
> In my main.cf I have recipient_delimiter = +.
> I use Mysql to emails adress and domains.
> What do I need to configurate this?
In Postfix, nothing. Postfix will look up aaa+xyz@d
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:01:10PM -0700, Constance Mallon wrote:
>
> I have a question regarding recipient delimiters. I need to set the
> recipient delimiter for my mailing lists (mailman) with "-" but I also
> need to set the recipient_delimiter to "+" for my calendar server.
>
> How can I s
* Noel Jones [28/05/2010 09:21] :
>
> Yes, man 5 access, look for the "email address extension" section.
Brillant. Thanks, Noel.
Emmanuel
On 5/27/2010 8:47 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
Hello, all.
I'm using a mailrelay and an internal server setup.
The mailrelay receives mail from the internet, runs a number of checks +
spamassassin + clamav then passes mail to the internal mail server.
One of the checks enforced on the mailrelay
Thanks to Sahil Tandon and LuKreme for pointing out my mistake on the
debugging tool. I saw this done in an old archived post, and having
searched for but not found the "what to include in a problem report"
FAQ item, I winged it, incorrectly. I also forgot to specify the
version of Postfix: 2.6.
On 17-Apr-2010, at 22:09, Jim Carter wrote:
>
> I have recipient_delimiter = + in main.cf, but postconf -d reports that
> the variable is empty.
postconf -d will *always* report that as empty.
Have you looked at the man page for postconf -d to see what it does? (H
INT: It's not what you think)
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jim Carter wrote:
> I have recipient_delimiter = + in main.cf, but postconf -d reports that
> the variable is empty. What could be suppressing setting it?
-d is for DEFAULT. The -n flag is what you use to display non-default
parameter settings. See the postconf(1) for more
post...@corwyn.net a écrit :
> [snip]
>
> So while recipient_delimited works "out of the box" it doesn't quite do
> what I want (hence why I provided not only what wasn't working, but a
> detailed explanation of what I wanted to solve.)
>
but you didn't talk about folders in your post, did you?
At 12:47 PM 2/12/2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:33:57PM -0500, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
> At 04:28 AM 2/12/2009, mouss wrote:
>> recipient_delimiter works "out of the box". there is no need to change
>> your tables, your sql statements nor add users.
This up to your LDA
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:33:57PM -0500, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
> At 04:28 AM 2/12/2009, mouss wrote:
>> recipient_delimiter works "out of the box". there is no need to change
>> your tables, your sql statements nor add users.
>
> The problem is I don't know what the "out of the box" behavior
At 04:28 AM 2/12/2009, mouss wrote:
recipient_delimiter works "out of the box". there is no need to change
your tables, your sql statements nor add users.
The problem is I don't know what the "out of the box" behavior should be.
If I set recipient_delimiter = + then mail to u...@example.com,
post...@corwyn.net a écrit :
>
>
> OK, so I've become intrigued with recipient delimiters.
>
> My users are currently stored in a mysql database, 'postfix'. The table
> format is as postfixadmin sets it up, so in the username is the user
> email address u...@example.com
>
> Before I started t
Thomas Ackermann wrote:
Hello,
i use the recipient_delimiter (with a ".") quite often.
Some of those sub-recipients(?) of accounts are already spammed.
I would like to reject Mails to them ...
For example:
name.post...@$mydomain would be OK, while
name.s...@$mydomain should be rejected ...
Wh
Thomas Ackermann:
> Hello,
> i use the recipient_delimiter (with a ".") quite often.
>
> Some of those sub-recipients(?) of accounts are already spammed.
>
> I would like to reject Mails to them ...
>
> For example:
> name.post...@$mydomain would be OK, while
> name.s...@$mydomain should be reje
29 matches
Mail list logo
