On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 09:47:31PM -0400, Alex via Postfix-users wrote:
> Hi, I'm using postfix-3.7.9 multi-instance on fedora38 and can't figure out
> why always_bcc and recipient_bcc_maps aren't working on the outbound
> instance.
>
> 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n- n - 16smtp
- Message from Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
-
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 12:40:49 -0500
From: Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
Reply-To: postfix-users@postfix.org, Viktor Dukhovni
Subject: [pfx] Re: recipient_bcc_maps clarification.
To: postfix-users
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:24:15AM +0530, anant--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> For specific 2 recipients of our domain, we don't want always_bcc to be
> implemented. ie. if a mail is addressed to a...@xx.com (our domain only),
> mail should not be Bcc to zz...@xx.com. similarly if mail recipient
John Fawcett via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-01-08 18:09:
#/etc/postfix/regexp_recipient_bcc
a...@xx.com devnull
d...@xx.com devnull
@xx.com zz...@xx.com
Postfix will still generate bcc messages for emails to abc and def but
they won't actually get sent out.
this is why always_bcc
On 08/01/2024 05:54, anant--- via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello,
We have in main.cf always_bcc = zz...@xx.com and our domain is xx.com
For specific 2 recipients of our domain, we don't want always_bcc to
be implemented. ie. if a mail is addressed to a...@xx.com (our domain
only), mail should
Thanks. I've got it working.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 3:34 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: recipient_bcc_maps using mysql
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:42:41AM -0800, Fred M
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:42:41AM -0800, Fred Morris wrote:
> http://www.postfix.org/MYSQL_README.html
For general background. For table syntax:
http://www.postfix.org/mysql_table.5.html
--
Viktor.
http://www.postfix.org/MYSQL_README.html
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, post...@aecperformance.com wrote:
I'm trying to set up a mysql table for: recipient_bcc_maps
I've read this, repeatedly:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html recipient_bcc_maps
It doesn't really help me.
Wietse Venema:
> There is NO DEPENDENCY between Postfix virtual alias expansion and
> sender/recipient_bcc_maps. The result from vitual alias expansion
> is NOT used by sender/recipient_bcc_maps, and the result from
> sender/recipient_bcc_maps is NOT used by virtual alias expansion.
Correction: th
There is NO DEPENDENCY between Postfix virtual alias expansion and
sender/recipient_bcc_maps. The result from vitual alias expansion
is NOT used by sender/recipient_bcc_maps, and the result from
sender/recipient_bcc_maps is NOT used by virtual alias expansion.
Sorry, I will not spend my time on ma
Hi
List users with alias.gr...@domain.ltd:
us...@dommain.ltd
us...@domain.ltd (this e-mail is in recipient_bcc_maps ->
arch...@domain.ltd)
us...@domain.ltd
us...@domain.ltd
us...@domain.ltd
us...@domain.ltd (this e-mail is in recipient_bcc_maps ->
arch...@domain.ltd)
us...@domain.ltd
us...@domain.
Wietse Venema, 02.12.19, 19:28 CET:
> Make it a PCRE map.
>
> # DO NOT INDENT THE TEXT BETWEEN IF AND ENDIF
> if !/^foo([-+]\S+)?@example\.com$/
> /@example\.com$/ b...@example.com
> endif
>
> See 'man pcre_table' for details.
Thanks Wietse!
I'll do it that way.
--
Regards
mks
Markus Sch?nhaber:
> Hi,
>
> having recipient_bcc_maps set to a map containing
>
> @example.com b...@example.com
Make it a PCRE map.
# DO NOT INDENT THE TEXT BETWEEN IF AND ENDIF
if !/^foo([-+]\S+)?@example\.com$/
/@example\.com$/ b...@example.com
endif
See 'man pcre_table' for details.
Hi Jaroslaw!
Jaroslaw Rafa, 02.12.19, 18:42 CET:
> Dnia 2.12.2019 o godz. 18:11:27 Markus Schönhaber pisze:
>>
>> having recipient_bcc_maps set to a map containing
>>
>> @example.com b...@example.com
>>
>> should create a BCC for every mail sent to example.com regardless of the
>> local part.
>>
Dnia 2.12.2019 o godz. 18:11:27 Markus Schönhaber pisze:
>
> having recipient_bcc_maps set to a map containing
>
> @example.com b...@example.com
>
> should create a BCC for every mail sent to example.com regardless of the
> local part.
> Is there an easy way to define an exception, i. e. BCCs s
Il 10/06/13 16:26, v.dimit...@synergetic.ag ha scritto:
You may use something like this:
bcc_table:
address | enabled
| 1
spec...@example.com | 1
SELECT case when `enabled` then 'other_...@example.com' else
'default_...@example.com' end FROM `bcc_table` where `address` in ('%s','')
order by
> Hi list,
>
> I need to setup recipient_bcc_maps to get the following behaviour:
> - by default, I need every message to be BBC'd to
> default_...@example.com
> - for particular recipients, I need the message to be BCC'd to
> other_...@example.com (and to this address only)
>
> - I need particul
On 2/3/11 9:18 AM, l...@ds.gauner.org wrote:
l...@ds.gauner.org:
I've configured recipient_bcc_maps to capture outgoing mail to some
domains to debug delivery issues, i.e. some senders can't send mails to
yahoo and yahoo wants the full body. So I thought I could just capture
these mails using r
> l...@ds.gauner.org:
>> I've configured recipient_bcc_maps to capture outgoing mail to some
domains to debug delivery issues, i.e. some senders can't send mails to
yahoo and yahoo wants the full body. So I thought I could just capture
these mails using recipient_bcc_maps and later forward them to
l...@ds.gauner.org:
> Hi,
>
> I've configured recipient_bcc_maps to capture outgoing mail to some
> domains to debug delivery issues, i.e. some senders can't send mails to
> yahoo and yahoo wants the full body. So I thought I could just capture
> these mails using recipient_bcc_maps and later forw
On 7/6/2010 10:43 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:11:27AM -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
>
>> I've been watching this for a while and still not sure what could be
>> causing it it or if its a known issue, but thought I'd pass it along
>> here on the mailing list to see whatever o
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:11:27AM -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
> I've been watching this for a while and still not sure what could be
> causing it it or if its a known issue, but thought I'd pass it along
> here on the mailing list to see whatever one else thought.
>
> I use recipient_bcc_maps to bc
On 7/6/2010 10:11 AM, Matt Hayes wrote:
> I've been watching this for a while and still not sure what could be
> causing it it or if its a known issue, but thought I'd pass it along
> here on the mailing list to see whatever one else thought.
>
Crap, forgot to add this in, my apologies!
mail_ve
Arek Czereszewski a écrit :
> W dniu 2010-06-30 02:12, mouss pisze:
>> Arek Czereszewski a écrit :
Isnt this the expected behaviour when the mail in question is sent to
both user1 and user2 ?
User1 - 1 copy - original copy to user1
User2 - 1 copy - original copy to user2
Us
W dniu 2010-06-30 02:12, mouss pisze:
Arek Czereszewski a écrit :
Isnt this the expected behaviour when the mail in question is sent to
both user1 and user2 ?
User1 - 1 copy - original copy to user1
User2 - 1 copy - original copy to user2
User2 - 1 copy - from the bcc map
It should be:
user1
Arek Czereszewski a écrit :
>> Isnt this the expected behaviour when the mail in question is sent to
>> both user1 and user2 ?
>> User1 - 1 copy - original copy to user1
>> User2 - 1 copy - original copy to user2
>> User2 - 1 copy - from the bcc map
>>
>
> It should be:
> user1 1 copy (original) a
Isnt this the expected behaviour when the mail in question is sent to
both user1 and user2 ?
User1 - 1 copy - original copy to user1
User2 - 1 copy - original copy to user2
User2 - 1 copy - from the bcc map
It should be:
user1 1 copy (original) and user2 1 copy from bcc
Now user2 get 2 the same
On 06/29/2010 01:30 PM, Arek Czereszewski wrote:
Hi,
I try to use recipient_bcc_maps for one user to copy emails to another.
In main.cf I have:
recipient_bcc_maps = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/wakacje
In wakacje:
us...@wup-katowice.pl us...@wup-katowice.pl
But user2 always get 2 the same mess
> -Message d'origine-
> De : owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] De la part de Jeroen Geilman
> Envoyé : vendredi 11 juin 2010 01:06
> À : postfix-users@postfix.org
> Objet : Re: recipient_bcc_maps override
>
> On
On 06/11/2010 12:59 AM, Emmanuel Bailleul wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently working on a test box to verify the behavior of some features I'd
like to implement on a production mail relay server.
Among those are recipient_bcc_maps/sender_bcc_maps (to keep copies of certain
emails) and after-queue con
Wietse:
> I don't see any text that _bcc_maps recipient are given other
> treatment than non-BCC recipients.
Stan Hoeppner:
> Thanks Wietse. I was misreading this
>
> Note: automatic BCC recipients are produced only for new
> mail. To avoid mailer loops, automatic BCC recipients
>
Wietse Venema put forth on 4/29/2010 9:05 AM:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> I'm current using recipient_bcc_maps to forward spam trap emails to a dnsbl.
>> I've been asked by another dnsbl to provide them the same trap data.
>> According to recipient_bcc_maps, I can't bcc to more than one address.
>
> As d
Stan Hoeppner:
> I'm current using recipient_bcc_maps to forward spam trap emails to a dnsbl.
> I've been asked by another dnsbl to provide them the same trap data.
> According to recipient_bcc_maps, I can't bcc to more than one address.
As documented.
> I
> thought of creating a local alias th
This is useless here because recipient_bcc_maps are handled by
cleanup(8) and not smtpd(8). You need to use a different cleanup(8)
instance which overrides the default bcc maps setting for mail coming
through this special smtpd(8) listener.
Cool! So i wrote this, and working! Thank you!
smtps i
On Oct 7, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Halassy Zoltán wrote:
Hello!
In main.cf I am using a global blind carbon copy table:
recipient_bcc_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/global_bcc
I would like to ignore this table, when trusted user sends a mail so
i wrote this into master.cf:
smtps inet n -
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:57:12AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
BTW, you can use "DUNNO" as the result in a pcre table to pretend the
string wasn't found. No need to use a "null" alias.
No, this is wrong. DUNNO is an access(5) action, which has no special
meaning i
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:57:12AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> BTW, you can use "DUNNO" as the result in a pcre table to pretend the
> string wasn't found. No need to use a "null" alias.
No, this is wrong. DUNNO is an access(5) action, which has no special
meaning in address rewriting tables.
-
csere matyas wrote:
hi
i have a postfix set up with a bunch of virtual domains.
we've been using always_bcc to archive the mail, until one of the
paranoid users asked us not to include his mail in the archive.
so i'm trying to do the same with recipient/sender maps:
recipient_bcc_maps =
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:34:21AM +0200, csere matyas wrote:
> so i'm trying to do the same with recipient/sender maps:
>
> recipient_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/recipient_bcc
>
> sender_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/se
Márcio Luciano Donada wrote:
Wietse Venema escreveu:
M�rcio Luciano Donada:
Hi list,
I am successfully using the parameters, but the e-mails arriving at
their destination duplicates, is that correct? I'm using postfix 2.3.8-2
See: http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html and look for
"receiv
Wietse Venema escreveu:
> M�rcio Luciano Donada:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I am successfully using the parameters, but the e-mails arriving at
>> their destination duplicates, is that correct? I'm using postfix 2.3.8-2
>
> See: http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html and look for
> "receive_override_opt
M?rcio Luciano Donada:
> Hi list,
>
> I am successfully using the parameters, but the e-mails arriving at
> their destination duplicates, is that correct? I'm using postfix 2.3.8-2
See: http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html and look for
"receive_override_options".
Wietse
42 matches
Mail list logo
