Arek Czereszewski a écrit : > W dniu 2010-06-30 02:12, mouss pisze: >> Arek Czereszewski a écrit : >>>> Isnt this the expected behaviour when the mail in question is sent to >>>> both user1 and user2 ? >>>> User1 - 1 copy - original copy to user1 >>>> User2 - 1 copy - original copy to user2 >>>> User2 - 1 copy - from the bcc map >>>> >>> >>> It should be: >>> user1 1 copy (original) and user2 1 copy from bcc >>> Now user2 get 2 the same messages. >>> >>> It should be via bcc because user1 will go for long vacations >>> and their department waiting for important email. >>> >> >> please show logs of delivery. and test with "telnet" and show a >> transcript. >> > Hi; > > from log: > > Jun 30 08:39:09 mx1 postgrey[1084]: action=pass, reason=triplet found, > client_name=mail-wy0-f173.google.com, client_address=74.125.82.173, > sender=...@gmail.com, recipient=us...@wup-katowice.pl > Jun 30 08:39:10 mx1 postfix/policyd-weight[78833]: weighted check: > NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 > DSBL_ORG=SKIP(0) CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: > .mail-wy0-f173.google. - helo-domain: .google.) > FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2 IN_PM_RFCI=0.1; <client=74.125.82.173> > <helo=mail-wy0-f173.google.com> <from=...@gmail.com> > <to=us...@wup-katowice.pl>; rate: -8.4 > Jun 30 08:39:10 mx1 postfix/policyd-weight[78833]: decided > action=PREPEND X-policyd-weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 > NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 DSBL_ORG=SKIP(0) > CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-wy0-f173.google. > - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2 > IN_PM_RFCI=0.1; rate: -8.4; <client=74.125.82.173> > <helo=mail-wy0-f173.google.com> <from=...@gmail.com> > <to=us...@wup-katowice.pl>; delay: 1s > Jun 30 08:39:13 mx1 postfix/pipe[101]: E8DF761C64: > to=<us...@wup-katowice.pl>, relay=spamassassin, delay=7.5, > delays=5.1/0/0/2.4, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via spamassassin > service) > Jun 30 08:39:13 mx1 kavmd[1226]: app [0x28902f10] INFO Processing > message from:<x...@gmail.com> to:<us...@wup-katowice.pl>, > <us...@wup-katowice.pl>, <us...@wup-katowice.pl> via:N/A > Jun 30 08:39:13 mx1 postfix/smtp[105]: 7EEB061C76: > to=<us...@wup-katowice.pl>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10025, > delay=0.27, delays=0.04/0/0/0.23, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: > queued as 84C6961C7B) > Jun 30 08:39:13 mx1 postfix/virtual[112]: 84C6961C7B: > to=<us...@wup-katowice.pl>, relay=virtual, delay=0.29, > delays=0.23/0/0/0.06, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to maildir) >
the only line above that talks about user2 is the "kavmd" line, which you can easily understand that we don't care about.
