Re: rbl checks, best place + ipv6?

2009-08-24 Thread Dave Täht
Mark Martinec writes: > On Sunday August 23 2009 04:10:06 Dave Täht wrote: >> What I found after fighting with an exchange server that what seems to >> work best is assigning my first mx host to be ipv6 only, and my fallback >> to be a mx ipv6 and ipv4 host. > > My choice is to have the first MX

Re: rbl checks, best place + ipv6?

2009-08-23 Thread Mark Martinec
On Sunday August 23 2009 04:10:06 Dave Täht wrote: > What I found after fighting with an exchange server that what seems to > work best is assigning my first mx host to be ipv6 only, and my fallback > to be a mx ipv6 and ipv4 host. My choice is to have the first MX have both the IPv6 and IPv4 addr

Re: rbl checks, best place

2009-08-23 Thread Stefan Förster
* /dev/rob0 : > On Friday 21 August 2009 00:23:07 Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > > This is a difficult question. > > > > > > I disagree. > > > > Just that because you disagree makes the question not simple :) > > Perhaps you didn't understand. I tried to explain why the choice of > pre-DATA reject_rb

Re: rbl checks, best place + ipv6?

2009-08-22 Thread Dave Täht
mouss writes: > Dave a écrit : >> Hello, >> I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my >> postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some >> rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i >> disable that and activa

Re: rbl checks, best place

2009-08-22 Thread /dev/rob0
On Friday 21 August 2009 00:23:07 Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > This is a difficult question. > > > > I disagree. > > Just that because you disagree makes the question not simple :) Perhaps you didn't understand. I tried to explain why the choice of pre-DATA reject_rbl_client lookups should be prefe

Re: rbl checks, best place

2009-08-21 Thread mouss
Olivier Nicole a écrit : > Hi Dave, > >> I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my >> postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some >> rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i >> disable that and activate t

Re: rbl checks, best place

2009-08-21 Thread mouss
Dave a écrit : > Hello, > I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my > postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some > rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i > disable that and activate them in spamassassi

Re: rbl checks, best place

2009-08-20 Thread Olivier Nicole
> > This is a difficult question. > I disagree. Just that because you disagree makes the question not simple :) > 2. Gmail is not squeaky clean, it's no surprise that they end up in Of course, but then it gets people complaining why they cannot receive mails from gmail. > 5. A reject_rbl_clien

Re: rbl checks, best place

2009-08-20 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thursday 20 August 2009 22:56:31 Olivier Nicole wrote: > > I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my > > postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have > > some rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or > > should i disab

Re: rbl checks, best place

2009-08-20 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi Dave, > I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my > postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some > rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i > disable that and activate them in spamassassin? Suggestions