Re: postfix configuration verification

2012-03-21 Thread /dev/rob0
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 04:07:43PM -0700, Mark S wrote: > smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_rhsbl_client > dbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rhsbl_sender dbl.spamhaus.org, > reject_rhsbl_helo dbl.spamhaus.org This works fine as you have done it, but it might be easier at this point to keep all restricti

Re: postfix configuration verification

2012-03-21 Thread Mark S
Thank you so much for your valuable advice. (Yeah, I really mean it. Thank you so much!!!) Here's my new config: sudo postconf -n alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases always_add_missing_headers = yes biff = no config_directory = /etc/postfix disable_vrfy_command = yes home_mailbox = Maildir/ mailbox_s

Re: postfix configuration verification

2012-03-21 Thread Steve Crawford
On 03/21/2012 12:31 PM, Mark S wrote: I wanted to keep it as simple as possible, so I decided to ditch the numerous options that can be used for spam detection based on SMTP protocol quirks (EHLO etc.) I think those spam sender will get filtered lateron by postgray and zen.spamhaus.org anyway.

Re: postfix configuration verification

2012-03-21 Thread /dev/rob0
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:31:23PM -0700, Mark S wrote: > > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > > > permit_mynetworks, > > > reject_unauth_destination, > > > reject_unknown_sender_domain, > > > reject_unknown_client_hostname, > > > > This is not safe for general usage. It's very aggr

Re: postfix configuration verification

2012-03-21 Thread Mark S
Hi, thank you so much for your valuable input! > Commas are irrelevant, just another of several forms of whitespace. > "Postfix main.cf file format" is at the very top of this very long > manual: > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html thanks! > > I am totally new to the mail server busine

Re: postfix configuration verification

2012-03-21 Thread /dev/rob0
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:31:19AM -0700, Mark S wrote: > there is one comma missing after reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, > that's fixed of course. Commas are irrelevant, just another of several forms of whitespace. "Postfix main.cf file format" is at the very top of this very long manual: h

Re: postfix configuration verification

2012-03-21 Thread Mark S
Hi Brian, thanks for you answer. Here is my new configuration (postconf -n): alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases always_add_missing_headers = yes biff = no config_directory = /etc/postfix disable_vrfy_command = yes home_mailbox = Maildir/ mailbox_size_limit = 0 milter_default_action = accept milter_pr

Re: postfix configuration verification

2012-03-21 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 3/21/2012 2:31 PM, Mark S wrote: > there is one comma missing after reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, that's > fixed of course. Commas are treated the same as whitespace to Postfix. They are not required. > > > - Original Message - > From: Mark S > To: "postfix-users@postfix.org" >

Re: postfix configuration verification

2012-03-21 Thread Mark S
there is one comma missing after reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, that's fixed of course. - Original Message - From: Mark S To: "postfix-users@postfix.org" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 7:28 PM Subject: postfix configuration verification Hi all, I am totally new to the mail