LuKreme wrote:
Authentication is another matter, but as I recall, that is outside
postfix purview and I need to go dink with cyrus-sasl-saslauthd for that.
Mar 15 12:54:40 mail submit/smtpd[7403]: Anonymous TLS connection
established from c-67-164-162-51.hsd1.co.comcast.net[67.164.162.51]:
TL
On 14-Mar-2009, at 22:53, Noel Jones wrote:
But you should really be testing with telnet and openssl s_client
before you start testing with a MUA.
Yep. Like I said this was just a "let's see what we get in the logs"
little test. Mucking about some more with it, TLS at least is working
now
LuKreme wrote:
On 14-Mar-2009, at 13:02, mouss wrote:
test the connection manually:
$ telnet yourserv 587
...
EHLO yourclienthostname
...
QUIT
Right, I do know that. Sorry if I wasn't clear, my only point was that
what was actaully logged under submit was not useful and expressing
disappoi
On 14-Mar-2009, at 13:02, mouss wrote:
test the connection manually:
$ telnet yourserv 587
...
EHLO yourclienthostname
...
QUIT
Right, I do know that. Sorry if I wasn't clear, my only point was
that what was actaully logged under submit was not useful and
expressing disappointment that th
LuKreme a écrit :
> On 13-Mar-2009, at 14:51, Jorey Bump wrote:
>> submission inet n - n - - smtpd
>> -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
>> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
>> -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
>
> Yeah, once I get TLS setup.
On 14-Mar-2009, at 11:05, Jorey Bump wrote:
LuKreme wrote, at 03/14/2009 12:19 PM:
submit/smtpd[32686]: connect from
c-67-164-162-51.hsd1.co.comcast.net[67.164.162.51]
submit/smtpd[32686]: lost connection after EHLO from
c-67-164-162-51.hsd1.co.comcast.net[67.164.162.51]
submit/smtpd[32686]: dis
On Mar 14, 2009, at 12:20 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 13-Mar-2009, at 14:51, Jorey Bump wrote:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
Yeah, once I g
LuKreme wrote, at 03/14/2009 12:19 PM:
> On 13-Mar-2009, at 14:51, Jorey Bump wrote:
>> submission inet n - n - - smtpd
>> -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
>> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
>> -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
>
> Yeah, o
On 13-Mar-2009, at 14:51, Jorey Bump wrote:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
Yeah, once I get TLS setup. I am running 2.5.6. I did chang
On 13-Mar-2009, at 14:51, Jorey Bump wrote:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
Yeah, once I get TLS setup. I am running 2.5.6. I did chang
Sahil Tandon wrote, at 03/13/2009 08:36 PM:
> Jorey Bump wrote:
>> LuKreme wrote, at 03/13/2009 04:26 PM:
>>> On 13-Mar-2009, at 10:49, Bill Cole wrote:
>>>
If you have a good port 587 config in master.cf, you may need no
changes there. My submission entry for a server that accepts no por
Jorey Bump wrote:
LuKreme wrote, at 03/13/2009 04:26 PM:
On 13-Mar-2009, at 10:49, Bill Cole wrote:
If you have a good port 587 config in master.cf, you may need no
changes there. My submission entry for a server that accepts no port
25 submission from outside the LAN is:
submissioninet
LuKreme a écrit :
> I have the following helo restriction in a pcre file:
>
> !/[[:alpha:]]/REJECT helo non-alpha helo not allowed
>
> I ran it with WARN for quite a while and didn't see any legitimate
> messages that hit it, so I moved it to REJECT. However, my mailserver
>
LuKreme wrote, at 03/13/2009 04:26 PM:
> On 13-Mar-2009, at 10:49, Bill Cole wrote:
>
>> If you have a good port 587 config in master.cf, you may need no
>> changes there. My submission entry for a server that accepts no port
>> 25 submission from outside the LAN is:
>>
>> submissioninetn
On 13-Mar-2009, at 10:49, Bill Cole wrote:
Hi Bill! Postfix is a little more complicated than SIMS, isn't it :)
If you have a good port 587 config in master.cf, you may need no
changes there. My submission entry for a server that accepts no port
25 submission from outside the LAN is:
subm
LuKreme wrote, On 3/13/09 11:53 AM:
On 13-Mar-2009, at 09:04, Jorey Bump wrote:
For the people still supporting the antiquated model of accepting mail
submission via SMTP rather than a proper port 587 daemon, it is
important to make allowances for the fact that MUA's frequently have no
better c
LuKreme wrote:
On 13-Mar-2009, at 09:04, Jorey Bump wrote:
For the people still supporting the antiquated model of accepting mail
submission via SMTP rather than a proper port 587 daemon, it is
important to make allowances for the fact that MUA's frequently have no
better choice for their HELO
LuKreme wrote, at 03/13/2009 11:53 AM:
> On 13-Mar-2009, at 09:04, Jorey Bump wrote:
>>> For the people still supporting the antiquated model of accepting mail
>>> submission via SMTP rather than a proper port 587 daemon, it is
>>> important to make allowances for the fact that MUA's frequently ha
On 13-Mar-2009, at 09:04, Jorey Bump wrote:
For the people still supporting the antiquated model of accepting
mail
submission via SMTP rather than a proper port 587 daemon, it is
important to make allowances for the fact that MUA's frequently
have no
better choice for their HELO argument tha
Bill Cole wrote, at 03/13/2009 10:23 AM:
> Jorey Bump wrote, On 3/13/09 8:51 AM:
>> LuKreme wrote, at 03/13/2009 07:22 AM:
>>
>>> So I thought I'd see if anyone else thought that a helo in the form
>>> [12.34.56.789] SHOULD be allowed. I mean, as far as I recall, this is
>>> still technically allow
Jorey Bump wrote, On 3/13/09 8:51 AM:
LuKreme wrote, at 03/13/2009 07:22 AM:
So I thought I'd see if anyone else thought that a helo in the form
[12.34.56.789] SHOULD be allowed. I mean, as far as I recall, this is
still technically allowed, right?
A bracketed IP address is valid in a HELO/EH
LuKreme wrote, at 03/13/2009 07:22 AM:
> So I thought I'd see if anyone else thought that a helo in the form
> [12.34.56.789] SHOULD be allowed. I mean, as far as I recall, this is
> still technically allowed, right?
A bracketed IP address is valid in a HELO/EHLO, but is so rare in
legitimate mai
22 matches
Mail list logo
