On 11/4/2010 5:54 AM, Jerrale G wrote:
hellopostmas...@shetoncomputers.com,
You are receiving this message from dnswl.org because we try to identify and
notify
current users of our service about upcoming changes.
If you are not the right contact for issues dealing with spamfilters,
whitelisti
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 06:54:05 -0500, Larry Stone wrote:
> On 11/4/10 5:46 AM, Stan Hoeppner at s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
> > Be glad it's still free and that you simply have to add some
> > software to your system to make it work again.
>
> Care to provide some pointers to such software? Or
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 06:54:05AM -0500, Larry Stone wrote:
On 11/4/10 5:46 AM, Stan Hoeppner at s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Be glad it's still free and that you simply have to add some
software to your system to make it work again.
Care to provide som
Le 04/11/2010 13:53, Larry Stone a écrit :
On 11/4/10 7:06 AM, Ronald MacDonald at ron...@rmacd.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4 Nov 2010, at 11:54, Larry Stone wrote:
Be glad it's still free and that you simply have to add some software to
your system to make i
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 06:54:05AM -0500, Larry Stone wrote:
> On 11/4/10 5:46 AM, Stan Hoeppner at s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
> > Be glad it's still free and that you simply have to add some
> > software to your system to make it work again.
>
> Care to provide some pointers to such software?
On 11/4/10 7:06 AM, Ronald MacDonald at ron...@rmacd.com wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 4 Nov 2010, at 11:54, Larry Stone wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Be glad it's still free and that you simply have to add some software to
>>> your system to make it work again.
>>
>> C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4 Nov 2010, at 11:54, Larry Stone wrote:
>>
>> Be glad it's still free and that you simply have to add some software to
>> your system to make it work again.
>
> Care to provide some pointers to such software? Or do you just assume we all
> have
On 11/4/10 5:46 AM, Stan Hoeppner at s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
> Jerrale G put forth on 11/4/2010 4:54 AM:
>
>> you know, they could have made a premium service or addition to offset
>> overhead and generate revenue while having the white and blacklists as a
>> free service. This means that s
Jerrale G put forth on 11/4/2010 4:54 AM:
> you know, they could have made a premium service or addition to offset
> overhead and generate revenue while having the white and blacklists as a
> free service. This means that spamassassin's accuracy, and opensource,
> will reduce as well. I guess Im g
