On 20/10/11 13:07, Dennis Guhl wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:27:27PM +0200, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> Hello Dennis, thank for your comments, they are much appreciated.
>> I hope I understand enough to formulate a valid reply.
>
> It looks quite good (at least to me as a native german).
I w
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:27:27PM +0200, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> Hello Dennis, thank for your comments, they are much appreciated.
> I hope I understand enough to formulate a valid reply.
It looks quite good (at least to me as a native german).
> On 20/10/11 12:08, Dennis Guhl wrote:
> > On Th
Hello Dennis, thank for your comments, they are much appreciated.
I hope I understand enough to formulate a valid reply.
On 20/10/11 12:08, Dennis Guhl wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> On 19/10/11 21:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/sp
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 19/10/11 21:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
[..]
> > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedSpamdInPostfix, whose
> > first lines clearly mention the flaws you're system will run into
> > (generate backscatter, for instance)
>
On 19/10/11 21:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>> I agree and that's exactly my current solution, but I have some
>> questions regarding how I'm doing that. Without repeating myself, can
>> you please have a look at my configuration in the mail that originated
>> this thread and comment on my solution?
>
On 19.10.2011 21:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 19-10-11 18:54, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
On 19/10/11 18:46, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
Actually, there is an experimental extension for dovecot sieve that
allows piping to external commands, but with a quite secure design
(sysadmin controls which commands are
On 19-10-11 18:54, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 19/10/11 18:46, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>> Actually, there is an experimental extension for dovecot sieve that
>> allows piping to external commands, but with a quite secure design
>> (sysadmin controls which commands are available to the pipe extension).
On 19/10/11 18:46, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> Actually, there is an experimental extension for dovecot sieve that
> allows piping to external commands, but with a quite secure design
> (sysadmin controls which commands are available to the pipe extension).
> It works quite nice in the current state, and
On 19-10-11 17:33, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 19/10/11 16:01, Kris Deugau wrote:
>> Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>> Sieve can not call external programs, therefore I do not know ho to hook
>>> Spamassassin there, and, furthermore, I would like to avoid to have to
>>> setup things for each user.
>>
>>
On 19/10/11 16:01, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> Sieve can not call external programs, therefore I do not know ho to hook
>> Spamassassin there, and, furthermore, I would like to avoid to have to
>> setup things for each user.
>
> O_o News to me. Maybe there's some option to do
Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
Hello Kris, thank you for your comments.
On 18/10/11 17:03, Kris Deugau wrote:
Since you're happy to deliver the spam somewhere, rather than trying to
reject it during the SMTP conversation, you're probably best off calling
spamc early in your local-delivery rules rather
Hello Kris, thank you for your comments.
On 18/10/11 17:03, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Since you're happy to deliver the spam somewhere, rather than trying to
> reject it during the SMTP conversation, you're probably best off calling
> spamc early in your local-delivery rules rather than trying to int
Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
Hello,
on the web there are several recipes to integrate Spamassassin with
Postfix, but no one seems to me to be the definitive recipe. I think
that this configuration is quite common (for low volume smtp servers)
and would deserve a small space in Postfix official docume
13 matches
Mail list logo
