On 11/14/2010 3:29 AM, Will Fong wrote:
On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:28 AM, John Hinton wrote:
And, as our client base is controlled and are not spammer, avoiding
all spam checks on outbound is awesome. I used milters in sendmail in
order to do rejects and those checked all in and all out.
Hi J
On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:28 AM, John Hinton wrote:
>
> And, as our client base is controlled and are not spammer, avoiding all spam
> checks on outbound is awesome. I used milters in sendmail in order to do
> rejects and those checked all in and all out.
>
Hi John,
What do you mean by "controll
On 11/13/2010 05:28 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 11/13/2010 11:01 AM, John Hinton wrote:
OK, on a CentOS 5.X server with Amavisd-new and Postfix.
I think I still need some suggestions for tuning. I notice in my
logs, that dictionary attacks are normally being rejected by RBL,
mainly Spamhaus ins
On 11/13/2010 11:01 AM, John Hinton wrote:
OK, on a CentOS 5.X server with Amavisd-new and Postfix.
I think I still need some suggestions for tuning. I notice in my logs,
that dictionary attacks are normally being rejected by RBL, mainly
Spamhaus instead of failing due to unknown user. Is my t
