On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 02:21:31AM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> > There is no evidence that sender-side connection re-use has any material
> > impact on your queues. If you do want to enforce such limits, they should
> > be applied selectively to just IP sources with poor "reputations".
>
> I
Thanks Viktor,
>> 1) Once a client (or another MTA) establish a TCP connection with
>> listening port bounded by the SMTP daemon of Postfix, could happen that
>> more then one email messages are sent over that TCP connection, before
>> it
>> is closed?
>
> Sure this is possible, but it is unlik
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:59:37PM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> Returning to my question, I'm trying to understand:
>
> 1) Once a client (or another MTA) establish a TCP connection with
> listening port bounded by the SMTP daemon of Postfix, could happen that
> more then one email messages ar
Victor,
>> >> I fear that the problem is that for each session I can have an
>> unsettled
>> >> number of messages sent over that session (It could be happen? If
>> yes,
>> >> It could be depend on MTA settings?) other then an unsettled size of
>> >> SMTP traffic (which it determs the latency of
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:10:50PM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> >> I fear that the problem is that for each session I can have an unsettled
> >> number of messages sent over that session (It could be happen? If yes,
> >> It could be depend on MTA settings?) other then an unsettled size of
> >>
Hi,
>>> > I have a mail gateway system that consists of several
>>> > Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer.
>>> >
>>> > I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions
>>> that
>>> > every server has to manage.
>>>
>>> New connections are given to the ser
Hello,
>> > I have a mail gateway system that consists of several
>> > Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer.
>> >
>> > I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions
>> that
>> > every server has to manage.
>>
>> New connections are given to the server wit
> > I have a mail gateway system that consists of several
> > Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer.
> >
> > I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions
> that
> > every server has to manage.
>
> New connections are given to the server with the fewest con
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:39:01PM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> I have a mail gateway system that consists of several
> Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer.
>
> I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions that
> every server has to manage.
New con
