Re: RHEL 5.10 vs 6.4 performancs difference

2014-04-28 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
Note, my "quick" mental arithmetic was wrong, 28,000 in 30 minutes, is ~15 per second not ~1.5 per second, which at a latency of 2.8 seconds, is closer to a respectable concurrency of ~40. If this output rate is not high enough, you need to work with the remote vendor to reduce latency, or raise

RE: RHEL 5.10 vs 6.4 performancs difference

2014-04-28 Thread Xie, Wei
x.org] On Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 1:32 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: RHEL 5.10 vs 6.4 performancs difference On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:23:41PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Xie, Wei: > > [Symantec support issue] > > As Viktor noted, it i

RE: RHEL 5.10 vs 6.4 performancs difference

2014-04-28 Thread Xie, Wei
ix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Xie, Wei Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 8:01 PM To: Wietse Venema Cc: 'postfix-users@postfix.org' Subject: RE: RHEL 5.10 vs 6.4 performancs difference >>> RHEL 5.10 is old. Why are you evaluating it for production? It is very funny to talk about th

RE: RHEL 5.10 vs 6.4 performancs difference

2014-04-28 Thread Xie, Wei
org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 1:24 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: RHEL 5.10 vs 6.4 performancs difference Wietse: > RHEL 5.10 is old. Why are you evaluating it for production? Xie, Wei: > [Symantec support issue] As Vik

RE: RHEL 5.10 vs 6.4 performancs difference

2014-04-28 Thread Marius Gologan
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 8:01 PM To: Wietse Venema Cc: 'postfix-users@postfix.org' Subject: RE: RHEL 5.10 vs 6.4 performancs difference >>> RHEL 5.10 is old. Why are you evaluating it for production? It is very funny to talk about this story. We are running Symantec DLP appl

Re: RHEL 5.10 vs 6.4 performancs difference

2014-04-28 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:23:41PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Xie, Wei: > > [Symantec support issue] > > As Viktor noted, it is possible that they slow you down because > > - You're sending mail from a new IP address that has no reputation, > > - or you're sending mail from an old IP address

Re: RHEL 5.10 vs 6.4 performancs difference

2014-04-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse: > RHEL 5.10 is old. Why are you evaluating it for production? Xie, Wei: > [Symantec support issue] As Viktor noted, it is possible that they slow you down because - You're sending mail from a new IP address that has no reputation, - or you're sending mail from an old IP address that has

RE: RHEL 5.10 vs 6.4 performancs difference

2014-04-28 Thread Xie, Wei
>>> RHEL 5.10 is old. Why are you evaluating it for production? It is very funny to talk about this story. We are running Symantec DLP application 12.0.1 + Postfix 2.6.6 on RHEL 6.4 for outbound emails, which are delivered to FOPE (one windows antispam system - relay=mail.us.messaging.microsoft