Re: Procmail and permissions problem

2011-04-20 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/20/2011 7:07 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:09:07PM -0400, Alex wrote: zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.10 reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.11 reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org check_client_access Why the .10 and .11 Zen rejections, when you go ahead and use

Re: Procmail and permissions problem

2011-04-20 Thread Alex
Hi, >> I didn't realize dovecot had the sieve plugin. I have quite a few >> old procmail recipes I'll need to convert. > > AFAIK procmail still works fine. I moved away from it for server use > (as mailbox_command) a very long time ago, and for personal use (it > was invoked from .forward) at leas

Re: Procmail and permissions problem

2011-04-20 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:09:07PM -0400, Alex wrote: > >> I've just set up a fedora14 box with postfix v2.7.3, and would > >> like to use procmail as the delivery agent. > > > > First let's ask, why procmail? This fall will mark a decade since > > the last procmail release in 2001. It appears th

Re: Procmail and permissions problem

2011-04-19 Thread Alex
Hi, >> I've just set up a fedora14 box with postfix v2.7.3, and would like >> to use procmail as the delivery agent. > > First let's ask, why procmail? This fall will mark a decade since the > last procmail release in 2001. It appears that you only want to I didn't realize dovecot had the sieve p

Re: Procmail and permissions problem

2011-04-19 Thread /dev/rob0
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:23:36PM -0400, Alex wrote: > I've just set up a fedora14 box with postfix v2.7.3, and would like > to use procmail as the delivery agent. First let's ask, why procmail? This fall will mark a decade since the last procmail release in 2001. It appears that you only want

Re: Procmail and permissions problem

2011-04-18 Thread Alex
Hi, >> I've just set up a fedora14 box with postfix v2.7.3, and would like to >> use procmail as the delivery agent. In previous systems I've set up, >> procmail was setuid root, but on this one it is not. Without it, it >> seems it can't write the spool file: >> >> Apr 18 21:39:58 mail02t postfix