Stan Hoeppner:
> Wietse Venema put forth on 11/27/2009 5:17 PM:
> > Stan Hoeppner:
> >> I'm running my Postfix firewall behind NAT/PAT and the setup didn't
> >> require any non-default Postfix settings to make it work. I port
> >> forwarded TCP 25 from my router to my internal Postfix host IP and
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/27/2009 5:17 PM:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> I'm running my Postfix firewall behind NAT/PAT and the setup didn't
>> require any non-default Postfix settings to make it work. I port
>> forwarded TCP 25 from my router to my internal Postfix host IP and all
>> worked without iss
Stan Hoeppner:
> I'm running my Postfix firewall behind NAT/PAT and the setup didn't
> require any non-default Postfix settings to make it work. I port
> forwarded TCP 25 from my router to my internal Postfix host IP and all
> worked without issue. What settings are you referring to?
proxy_inter
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 03:42:56PM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 11/27/2009 6:20 AM:
> >
> >> Then it of course needs a publich IP addresses
> >
> > Or, at least, a public IP NAT/PAT'd to it by your firewall.
Well, I see no reason to have a MTA running on a public IP. As stated
above in the thread, as long as your server is HELO'ing out as the
name associated with the PTR record for its SRC-NAT, then you should
be fine.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 11/27/2009 6:20 AM:
>
>> Then it of course needs a publich IP addresses
>
> Or, at least, a public IP NAT/PAT'd to it by your firewall. It will
> also obviously need PTR, A, and MX records.
>
> Also, this may be
* Roman Gelfand :
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
> wrote:
> > * Roman Gelfand :
> >
> >> Is it preferable that machine running postfix should have publlic
> >> address as opposed NATed address?
> >
> > That depends on what you want to use it for
> >
>I want to use it to fi
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> * Roman Gelfand :
>
>> Is it preferable that machine running postfix should have publlic
>> address as opposed NATed address?
>
> That depends on what you want to use it for
>
I want to use it to filter spam and to send ham to internal
* Roman Gelfand :
> Is it preferable that machine running postfix should have publlic
> address as opposed NATed address?
That depends on what you want to use it for
> It appears that as postfix handing control to various plugins, the
> source address of the message is 127.0.0.1. Is there a co
