* Roman Gelfand <rgelfa...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt > <ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote: > > * Roman Gelfand <rgelfa...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Is it preferable that machine running postfix should have publlic > >> address as opposed NATed address? > > > > That depends on what you want to use it for > > > I want to use it to filter spam and to send ham to internal network.
Then it of course needs a publich IP addresses > >> It appears that as postfix handing control to various plugins, the > >> source address of the message is 127.0.0.1. Is there a configuration > >> in postfix that would ignore the localhost and show original source ip > >> address? > > > > That depends on which software you using. > > > I would like to use sid-milter and opendkim-milter. I don't know these, I'm using amavisd-new for DKIM... -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
