On Feb 18, 2014, at 2:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Noel Jones:
>> A few years ago I tried rejecting messages with no Message-ID. Much
>> to my surprise, there were far more false-positives than actual spam
>> rejected. I doubt the situation has changed much since then, but YMMV.
>
> That was m
Noel Jones:
> A few years ago I tried rejecting messages with no Message-ID. Much
> to my surprise, there were far more false-positives than actual spam
> rejected. I doubt the situation has changed much since then, but YMMV.
That was my experience, too. There was enough legitimate mail
without M
On 2/18/2014 3:41 PM, Andreas Schulze wrote:
>
> Noel Jones:
>
>> To detect missing headers you'll need a content filter such as
>> SpamAssassin.
>
> opendmarc-milter implement a test to verify RFC5322-required headers
> (RFC5322 3.6)
> The feature is new, available in the 1.2.0 Beta only.
> (ht
Noel Jones:
To detect missing headers you'll need a content filter such as
SpamAssassin.
opendmarc-milter implement a test to verify RFC5322-required headers
(RFC5322 3.6)
The feature is new, available in the 1.2.0 Beta only.
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/opendmarc/files/Pre-Releases/)
Greetings, postfix users!
>> I'd like to reject messages without some headers (say, Date: or
>> Message-ID:).
>> As far as I understand, headers-checks and body-checks could be done
>> as described at http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html
>>
>> The only question I could not find answer t
On 2/18/2014 10:54 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> I'd like to reject messages without some headers (say, Date: or
> Message-ID:).
> As far as I understand, headers-checks and body-checks could be done
> as described at http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html
>
> The only question I could not
