Robert Moskowitz skrev den 2013-01-13 19:49:
I did take this off list to Wietse, but it is worst than you make it
out to. It can even vary by sender to a list.
reply-all in roundcube sends ONLY to maillist not private
while reply ONLY reply private
why cant all others copy that ? :)
On 01/13/2013 02:15 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Speaking of broken, this thread exists because software ignores the
"Reply-To:" header which was defined in RFC 822 30+ years ago, and
which exists to this date in RFC 5322.
So if you guys could file a bug report, that might help more than
apologizin
Speaking of broken, this thread exists because software ignores the
"Reply-To:" header which was defined in RFC 822 30+ years ago, and
which exists to this date in RFC 5322.
So if you guys could file a bug report, that might help more than
apologizing for user interface issues.
Wietse
On 01/12/2013 04:35 PM, Peter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/01/13 06:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
i DO want supress duplicates it works on a lower level -> dbmail
i am receiving around 500 mails per day with duplicates still
supressed so i do not need them too in a di
I did take this off list to Wietse, but it is worst than you make it out
to. It can even vary by sender to a list.
I apologize, a little for top posting. Another deadly list sin, but I
did not want this buried all the way at the end.
This message from Harald, if I reply to sender it goes to
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:41:26AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I am surprised by all the apologetic replies about mailing lists,
> when "Reply-To:" is in fact standardized for more than 30 years,
> and it has nothing to do with mailing lists.
Furthermore, way upthread the original request was t
I am surprised by all the apologetic replies about mailing lists,
when "Reply-To:" is in fact standardized for more than 30 years,
and it has nothing to do with mailing lists.
Wietse
Citing from RFC 5322 section 3.6.2 (published 2008):
When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicat
On 1/12/13 9:55 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> and that is the really sad thing of this thread
>
> the subject is about "REPLY-TO headers"
> but WTF - there is NO reply-to header at all
>
> reply goes back to the sender while it would go back
> to the list if the messages WOULD contain "Reoly-To"
>
> s
t would be better to add a "reply-To"-header
as any php-script adds in 5 seconds before start such topic!
___
what i mean? grep of this message-source from the list
does not contain any "REPLY-TO headers" to respect!
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~/Desktop]$ cat source.txt | gr
On 1/12/13 8:49 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Richard Damon:
>> On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
> header. I have asked you this before, and I thi
Am 12.01.2013 22:35, schrieb Peter:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 13/01/13 06:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> i DO want supress duplicates it works on a lower level -> dbmail
>>
>> i am receiving around 500 mails per day with duplicates still
>> supressed so i do not need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/01/13 06:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
> i DO want supress duplicates it works on a lower level -> dbmail
>
> i am receiving around 500 mails per day with duplicates still
> supressed so i do not need them too in a different folder to save
> two seco
Am 12.01.2013 17:45, schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
> On 12-01-13 15:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> but as said - there are a lot of mailing-lists out there which are
>> configured by morons where this all does not work as it should or
>> is destroyed because many users on other lists are doing permanentl
On 12-01-13 15:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> but as said - there are a lot of mailing-lists out there which are
> configured by morons where this all does not work as it should or
> is destroyed because many users on other lists are doing permanently
> "reply-all" and if your server is configured l
Am 12.01.2013 15:18, schrieb Matthias Andree:
> Am 11.01.2013 15:33, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>> I WILL work more at paying attention to what works here.
>
> Your headers reveal you are using Thunderbird; it can't be that hard to
> click "List reply" or whatever the button inscription translate
Am 11.01.2013 15:33, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>
> On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
>> header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
>> your email until you play by the same rules as everyone else.
>
On 1/12/2013 7:49 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Richard Damon:
>> On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
> header. I have asked you this before, and I t
Am 12.01.2013 14:49, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Richard Damon:
>> On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
> header. I have asked you this before, and
Richard Damon:
> On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Robert Moskowitz:
> >> On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>> Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
> >>> header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
> >>> your email until you
On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz:
>> On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
>>> header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
>>> your email until you play by the same rules as e
Robert Moskowitz:
>
> On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
> > header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
> > your email until you play by the same rules as everyone else.
>
> Sorry about that last
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
your email until you play by the same rules as everyone else.
Sorry about that last transmission.
Your request would b
22 matches
Mail list logo
