Re: Delay before initial 220 greeting

2012-03-01 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 3/1/2012 11:42 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > On 3/1/2012 11:49 AM, Alex wrote: >> Hi, >> I had thought it was related, but another issue I'm trying to figure out is how to prevent a single remote server from sending thousands of messages at a time, filling the queue, and

Re: Delay before initial 220 greeting

2012-03-01 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 3/1/2012 11:49 AM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > >>> I had thought it was related, but another issue I'm trying to figure >>> out is how to prevent a single remote server from sending thousands of >>> messages at a time, filling the queue, and causing significant >>> delivery delays for all mail. >> Is it

Re: Delay before initial 220 greeting

2012-03-01 Thread Alex
Hi, >> I had thought it was related, but another issue I'm trying to figure >> out is how to prevent a single remote server from sending thousands of >> messages at a time, filling the queue, and causing significant >> delivery delays for all mail. > > Is it safe to assume these thousands of messa

Re: Delay before initial 220 greeting

2012-02-28 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 2/28/2012 8:37 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > >> Now that you done some optimization, kick default_process_limit back >> down to 200 and see it that works. If so, keep backing it off by 25 >> each time until you start to see the slowdown again. Then bump it back >> up by 10 and leave it. >> >> Next

Re: Delay before initial 220 greeting

2012-02-28 Thread Noel Jones
On 2/28/2012 8:37 PM, Alex wrote: > I had thought it was related, but another issue I'm trying to figure > out is how to prevent a single remote server from sending thousands of > messages at a time, filling the queue, and causing significant > delivery delays for all mail. > > I thought either gr

Re: Delay before initial 220 greeting

2012-02-28 Thread Alex
Hi, > Now that you done some optimization, kick default_process_limit back > down to 200 and see it that works.  If so, keep backing it off by 25 > each time until you start to see the slowdown again.  Then bump it back > up by 10 and leave it. > > Next I'd look at smtp-amavis and see if it's keep

Re: Delay before initial 220 greeting

2012-02-24 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 2/23/2012 1:50 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > I have a postfix-2.8.7 system with fedora15 and amavisd-new-2.6.6. Lately I have been experiencing significant delays before receiving the initial postfix 220 greeting from all remote hosts. I've verified >>> >>> What is the output from: >>>

Re: Delay before initial 220 greeting

2012-02-23 Thread Wietse Venema
Alex: > I've removed the zen and psbl queries from smtpd and moved psbl to postscreen. > > How can I monitor the number of smtpd processes currently being > utilized in real-time? Even though it's set to 300, "ps ax" shows Now that postscreen is taking most of the bullets, the number of smtpd pro

Re: Delay before initial 220 greeting

2012-02-23 Thread Alex
Hi, >>> I have a postfix-2.8.7 system with fedora15 and amavisd-new-2.6.6. >>> Lately I have been experiencing significant delays before receiving >>> the initial postfix 220 greeting from all remote hosts. I've verified >> >> What is the output from: >> >>     grep warning: /var/log/maillog >> >>

Re: Delay before initial 220 greeting

2012-02-22 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 2/22/2012 12:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Alex: >> Hi, >> >> I have a postfix-2.8.7 system with fedora15 and amavisd-new-2.6.6. >> Lately I have been experiencing significant delays before receiving >> the initial postfix 220 greeting from all remote hosts. I've verified > > What is the output

Re: Delay before initial 220 greeting

2012-02-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Alex: > Hi, > > I have a postfix-2.8.7 system with fedora15 and amavisd-new-2.6.6. > Lately I have been experiencing significant delays before receiving > the initial postfix 220 greeting from all remote hosts. I've verified What is the output from: grep warning: /var/log/maillog Then you m