RE: Content filter after DKIM proxy

2011-10-19 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Simon Brereton > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 2:36 PM > To: postfix users > Subject: Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy > > And I'd

Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy

2011-10-19 Thread Simon Brereton
On 18 October 2011 14:27, Noel Jones wrote: > On 10/18/2011 1:20 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: > >> I already use amavis to do the dkim checking on incoming mails.  I'm >> using dkimproxy to sign outgoing mails (and I confess I only found out >> about opendkim after I'd set it up, so I'm not keen to c

Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy

2011-10-19 Thread Simon Brereton
On 19 October 2011 14:04, Steve Jenkins wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Steve Jenkins > wrote: >>> >>> The following isn't one of my normal walkthrough HowTo blog posts, but it >>> does contain some notes I wrote to myself about things to consider when >>> deploying OpenDKIM with Amavi

Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy

2011-10-19 Thread Steve Jenkins
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote: > The following isn't one of my normal walkthrough HowTo blog posts, but it >> does contain some notes I wrote to myself about things to consider when >> deploying OpenDKIM with Amavis-new. I've also got additional stuff there >> detailing how

Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy

2011-10-19 Thread Steve Jenkins
> > I think the hour or less it would take to replace dkimproxy with > OpenDKIM would be well spent. > > A big +1 on this. I wrestled with DKIM-Proxy for a couple of afternoons before stumbling upon OpenDKIM. I had it up and running and playing nicely with Amavis-new in under an hour. The followin

Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy

2011-10-18 Thread Simon Brereton
On 18 October 2011 15:01, Simon Deziel wrote: > On 10/18/2011 01:41 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: >> On 18 October 2011 13:27, Simon Deziel wrote: >>> On 10/18/2011 01:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: Hi I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented DKIM si

Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy

2011-10-18 Thread Simon Deziel
On 10/18/2011 01:41 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: > On 18 October 2011 13:27, Simon Deziel wrote: >> On 10/18/2011 01:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented >>> DKIM signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outg

Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy

2011-10-18 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/18/2011 1:20 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: > I already use amavis to do the dkim checking on incoming mails. I'm > using dkimproxy to sign outgoing mails (and I confess I only found out > about opendkim after I'd set it up, so I'm not keen to change it at > the moment - though of course, your v

Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy

2011-10-18 Thread Simon Brereton
On 18 October 2011 13:52, Noel Jones wrote: > On 10/18/2011 12:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: >> Hi >> >> I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented >> DKIM signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outgoing - and I >> was happy with that. >> >> If I want A

Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy

2011-10-18 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/18/2011 12:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: > Hi > > I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented DKIM > signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outgoing - and I was > happy with that. > > If I want Amavis to scan and rate the mail after dkim proxy has

Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy

2011-10-18 Thread Simon Brereton
On 18 October 2011 13:27, Simon Deziel wrote: > On 10/18/2011 01:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: >> Hi >> >> I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented >> DKIM signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outgoing - and I >> was happy with that. > > I don't kno

Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy

2011-10-18 Thread Simon Deziel
On 10/18/2011 01:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote: > Hi > > I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented DKIM > signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outgoing - and I was > happy with that. I don't know if that's would suites you but Amavis is capable of pe