> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Simon Brereton
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 2:36 PM
> To: postfix users
> Subject: Re: Content filter after DKIM proxy
>
> And I'd
On 18 October 2011 14:27, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 1:20 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
>> I already use amavis to do the dkim checking on incoming mails. I'm
>> using dkimproxy to sign outgoing mails (and I confess I only found out
>> about opendkim after I'd set it up, so I'm not keen to c
On 19 October 2011 14:04, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Steve Jenkins
> wrote:
>>>
>>> The following isn't one of my normal walkthrough HowTo blog posts, but it
>>> does contain some notes I wrote to myself about things to consider when
>>> deploying OpenDKIM with Amavi
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> The following isn't one of my normal walkthrough HowTo blog posts, but it
>> does contain some notes I wrote to myself about things to consider when
>> deploying OpenDKIM with Amavis-new. I've also got additional stuff there
>> detailing how
>
> I think the hour or less it would take to replace dkimproxy with
> OpenDKIM would be well spent.
>
>
A big +1 on this. I wrestled with DKIM-Proxy for a couple of afternoons
before stumbling upon OpenDKIM. I had it up and running and playing nicely
with Amavis-new in under an hour.
The followin
On 18 October 2011 15:01, Simon Deziel wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 01:41 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> On 18 October 2011 13:27, Simon Deziel wrote:
>>> On 10/18/2011 01:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
Hi
I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented
DKIM si
On 10/18/2011 01:41 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
> On 18 October 2011 13:27, Simon Deziel wrote:
>> On 10/18/2011 01:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented
>>> DKIM signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outg
On 10/18/2011 1:20 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
> I already use amavis to do the dkim checking on incoming mails. I'm
> using dkimproxy to sign outgoing mails (and I confess I only found out
> about opendkim after I'd set it up, so I'm not keen to change it at
> the moment - though of course, your v
On 18 October 2011 13:52, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 12:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented
>> DKIM signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outgoing - and I
>> was happy with that.
>>
>> If I want A
On 10/18/2011 12:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
> Hi
>
> I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented DKIM
> signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outgoing - and I was
> happy with that.
>
> If I want Amavis to scan and rate the mail after dkim proxy has
On 18 October 2011 13:27, Simon Deziel wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 01:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented
>> DKIM signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outgoing - and I
>> was happy with that.
>
> I don't kno
On 10/18/2011 01:12 PM, Simon Brereton wrote:
> Hi
>
> I expect that this is not recommended practice, but before I implemented DKIM
> signing, Amavis used to scan ALL mail - incoming and outgoing - and I was
> happy with that.
I don't know if that's would suites you but Amavis is capable of
pe
12 matches
Mail list logo