> On 29 Dec 2020, at 12:58, Wolfgang Paul Rauchholz
> wrote:
>
> The server is listening on port 25, 587 and 465
> netstat -plutn | grep 25 and 587
> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:250.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> 28704/master
> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:587 0
On 29/12/2020 13:58, Wolfgang Paul Rauchholz wrote:
> I am setting up an email server on my home box with postfix and dovecot
> My server is modem router and has as such an internal and external
> network interface
>
> *>From my laptop (LAN)
> *From Thunderbird I get the message: Could not connect
On 4/19/2016 6:49 PM, jaso...@mail-central.com wrote:
>> Now to wait for something to trigger one of those double-bounce messages.
>
> Ugh. Still undeliverable.
>
> Well, I actually GET the email. Something 'internal' seems to be
> undeliverable.
>
> Now 'mail for example.com loops back to my
> Now to wait for something to trigger one of those double-bounce messages.
Ugh. Still undeliverable.
Well, I actually GET the email. Something 'internal' seems to be undeliverable.
Now 'mail for example.com loops back to myself' (not sure what I've done to
myself NOW. Grumble.)
Apr
Sry, talking to myself a bunch :-/
I changed
main.cf
- address_verify_transport_maps =
static:vpn:[back.mail01.example.com]:25
+ address_verify_transport_maps =
master.cf
[mail01.example.com]:25 inet n - n - 1 postscreen
I keep staring at this
Apr 19 14:48:31 mail01 postfix/vpn/smtp[21044]: connect to
back.mail01.example.com[10.1.1.16]:25: Connection refused
Apr 19 14:48:31 mail01 postfix/vpn/smtp[21044]: 3qqJYC3wYbz31Vm:
to=, relay=none, delay=0.1, delays=0/0.01/0.09/0,
dsn=4.4.1, status=undel
> The "connection refused" is the part that needs to be fixed.
VPN (temporarily?) down? firewall issue? "wrong" destination?
something else?
Starting with those^ to narrow down, looking backwards through my logs - for
cases of 'double-bounce' & 'connection refused' - this apparently has been
go
On 4/19/2016 2:12 PM, jaso...@mail-central.com wrote:
> I'm working on a relay to a backend postfix instance across a VPN link.
>
> My 'flow' is
>
> postscreen
> postscreen-smtp
> preQ milters
> postQ spam filter
> relay over VPN to the backend
>
> At the moment, ma
Am 20.10.2013 20:33, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Olaf Marzocchi:
>> postfix/smtp[2103]: [ID 947731 mail.warning] warning: relayhost
>> configuration problem
>> postfix/smtp[2103]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 311482A92D:
>> to=, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=157834,
>> delays=157833/0.01/0.08/0, dsn=4.3.5
Olaf Marzocchi:
> postfix/smtp[2103]: [ID 947731 mail.warning] warning: relayhost configuration
> problem
> postfix/smtp[2103]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 311482A92D:
> to=, orig_to=, relay=none, delay=157834,
> delays=157833/0.01/0.08/0, dsn=4.3.5, status=deferred (Host or domain name
> not found.
Hello,
thank you all for the quick answers.
Unfortunately, while the copy/paste of the stunnel.conf config and main.cf
config were correct (and showed matching local ports), my command line
involving telnet contained a typo: I had tried indeed to connect to the correct
local port 11125, even if
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 01:34:57AM +0200, Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
> However, Postfix cannot do SMTPS on port 465, so I installed
> stunnel and I set it to connect to ssl0.ovh.net:465. I did it on my
> OS X 10.8 and it worked, I can send mail from command line. As
> reference, I used the config sug
Olaf Marzocchi:
> If I use ssl0.ovh.net:25, I get a timeout. If I use port 587, I
> get "(TLS is required, but was not offered by host
> ssl0.ovh.net[213.186.33.20])", so I opted for SMTPS.
> However, Postfix cannot do SMTPS on port 465, so I installed stunnel
> and I set it to connect to ssl0.ovh.
Am 20.10.2013 01:34, schrieb Olaf Marzocchi:
> If I use ssl0.ovh.net:25, I get a timeout. If I use port 587, I get "(TLS is
> required, but was not offered by host ssl0.ovh.net[213.186.33.20])", so I
> opted for SMTPS.
> However, Postfix cannot do SMTPS on port 465, so I installed stunnel and I
> Aug 11 20:15:41 myhost sendmail[17048]: o7B9uJjQ015169:
> to=, ctladdr= (0/0),
> delay=15:19:22, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=1560372,
> relay=mail.example.com., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by
> mail.example.com.
That is the Sendmail MTA, not POSTFIX.
Wietse
Jim Wright wrote:
On Jul 3, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Thank you for your responses. Is there anything I can do on my end?
To put it simply, you're going to need to find a way to contact them postmaster
on the other end and let them know that legitimate mail is being blocked. You
junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
Have you verified your MTA's are not on a Black/Block list? Maybe
draxlerinsurance.com has firewalled you off. I know I would.
http://www.mxtoolbox.com/blacklists.aspx
OK, why would you firewall me off?
--
asai
mail.egismail.com closing connection
Connection closed by foreign host.
--
From: "Asai"
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 2:20 PM
To:
Subject: Re: Connection Refused on Port 25
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Thank you for your responses.
Is there anyt
sing connection
Connection closed by foreign host.
--
From: "Asai"
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 2:20 PM
To:
Subject: Re: Connection Refused on Port 25
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Thank you for your responses.
Is there anything I can do on my end? As
On Jul 3, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Asai wrote:
> Thank you for your responses. Is there anything I can do on my end?
To put it simply, you're going to need to find a way to contact them postmaster
on the other end and let them know that legitimate mail is being blocked. You
will first need to find a
On 07/03/2010 11:38 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:24:20PM -0700, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wro
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 02:24:20PM -0700, Asai wrote:
> Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
>>> Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
>> OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around thi
On 07/03/2010 11:24 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the admin for the CISCO PIX disable the
On 07/03/2010 11:20 PM, Asai wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the admin for the CISCO PIX disable the stupid
smtp fixup garbag
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the admin for the CISCO PIX disable the stupid
smtp fixup garbage on the CISCO box.
As far
On 07/03/2010 09:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the admin for the CISCO PIX disable the stupid
smtp fixup garbage on the CISCO box.
As far as I know, there is NE
On 2010-07-02 7:20 PM, Asai wrote:
> OK. Has anyone successfully been able to work around this issue?
The only way is to have the admin for the CISCO PIX disable the stupid
smtp fixup garbage on the CISCO box.
As far as I know, there is NEVER any reason to have this enabled on an
internet facing
Gary Chambers wrote:
Asai,
Eero, can you please elaborate on this? I don't follow you.
"Nice servers with cisco pix smtp fixout enabled."
Eero is asserting that the mail server to which you are trying to
connect is behind a Cisco PIX/ASA firewall. Those devices have a
known bug th
Sahil Tandon put forth on 7/2/2010 4:13 PM:
> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:41:06 -0700, Asai wrote:
>
>> For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to
>> this one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point
>> me in the right direction? Here's an example of the l
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:41:06 -0700, Asai wrote:
For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to
this one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point
me in the right direction? Here's an example of the log:
Jul 2 09:33:40 triata pos
I can't connect from my location...
[r...@smtp1 postfix]# telnet mail2.draxlerinsurance.com 25
Trying 67.227.17.36...
telnet: connect to address 67.227.17.36: Connection refused
2010/7/3 Asai :
> Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> 2010/7/2 Asai :
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to this
> one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point me in the
> right direction? Here's an example of the log:
Nice servers with
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:41:06 -0700, Asai wrote:
> For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to
> this one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point
> me in the right direction? Here's an example of the log:
>
> Jul 2 09:33:40 triata postfix/smtp[1485]:
Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/7/2 Asai :
Greetings,
For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to this
one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point me in the
right direction? Here's an example of the log:
Jul 2 09:33:10 triata amavis[1162]: (01162-09)
2010/7/2 Asai :
> Greetings,
>
> For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to this
> one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point me in the
> right direction? Here's an example of the log:
>
> Jul 2 09:33:10 triata amavis[1162]: (01162-09) Passed CLEAN, [
Asai put forth on 7/2/2010 3:41 PM:
> Greetings,
>
> For some reason, which I don't know how to figure out, our emails to
> this one specific email domain are being refused. Can anyone point me
> in the right direction? Here's an example of the log:
>
> Jul 2 09:33:10 triata amavis[1162]: (011
mahavir trivedi a écrit :
> dear freinds
>
> my mail server running ok(intranet mail server)postfix
>
> but suddenly error :connection refused
>
>
> pls find me it
>
try the DEBUG README. it contains many infos/suggestions to help you
diagnose the problem.
(that said, "connection refuse
I think we might need some more info, where are you seeing this error?
Can you post a snippet if your logfile?
Sent from my iPhone
On 22/12/2009, at 5:46 PM, mahavir trivedi
wrote:
dear freinds
my mail server running ok(intranet mail server)postfix
but suddenly error :connection refuse
* Just E. Mail :
>> Bind postfix to all interfaces, not just localhost
> Raif:
It'S Ralf. Raif is an Arab name. I guess. I am called Raif in Italy,
though. Dunno why.
> inet_interfaces = all
> (several lines further down in main.cf)
> inet_interfaces = localhost
Yes, that's why "postconf
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Just E. Mail :
"telnet localhost smtp" connects but when I try "telnet mail.tib.com 25",
I receive the error:
-
[r...@rs1 ~]# telnet mail.tib.com 25
Trying 65.103.190.107...
telnet: connect to address 65.103.190.107: Connection refused
telnet: Unable to co
* Just E. Mail :
> "telnet localhost smtp" connects but when I try "telnet mail.tib.com 25",
> I receive the error:
>
> -
> [r...@rs1 ~]# telnet mail.tib.com 25
> Trying 65.103.190.107...
> telnet: connect to address 65.103.190.107: Connection refused
> telnet: Unable to connect to remote
Jason Wohlford schrieb:
> I thought
> 'notify_classes=bounce,delay,policy,protocol,resource,software' would do
> the trick, but no luck.
I have the default setting "notify_classes = resource, software" active
and receive those notifications all the time.
Check the value of error_notice_recipient
On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Jason Wohlford wrote:
Is there a way to notify me (i.e. postmaster) when my
smtpd_proxy_filter
fails? I see in the logs where a "warning: connect to proxy service
127.0.0.1:10024: Connection refused" occurs. How do I get
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Jason Wohlford wrote:
> Is there a way to notify me (i.e. postmaster) when my smtpd_proxy_filter
> fails? I see in the logs where a "warning: connect to proxy service
> 127.0.0.1:10024: Connection refused" occurs. How do I get a message sent
> to me when this happens?
Try
On 19 Aug 2008, at 14:37, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Rupert Reid wrote:
Hello All,
I have two questions as follows:
1. I have set up the postfix server as follows:
postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_pe
Rupert Reid wrote:
Hello All,
I have two questions as follows:
1.I have set up the postfix server as follows:
postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
inet_interfaces = all
Rupert Reid wrote:
Hello All,
I have two questions as follows:
1. I have set up the postfix server as follows:
postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
inet_interfaces = all
mail_owner = postfix
mailq_p
48 matches
Mail list logo
