08.02.2023 12:14, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
..
/etc/postfix/sender-access:
top REJECT I employ crude anti-spam measures
.topREJECT I employ crude anti-spam measures
On 18.02.23 09:34, Michael Tokarev wrote:
I wonder how effective to block just the TLDs. I guess it is z
08.02.2023 12:14, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
..
/etc/postfix/sender-access:
top REJECT I employ crude anti-spam measures
.topREJECT I employ crude anti-spam measures
I wonder how effective to block just the TLDs. I guess it is zero, no?
I *guess* foo@top shouldn't re
James Pifer:
> On 2/16/2023 9:56 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > James Pifer:
> >> On 2/16/2023 9:21 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >>> Don't forget set an empty:
> >>>
> >>> parent_domain_matches_subdomains =
> >>>
> >> Where should that go exactly?
> > In main.cf.
> >
> > Wietse
>
> I shoul
On 2/16/2023 9:56 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
James Pifer:
On 2/16/2023 9:21 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Don't forget set an empty:
parent_domain_matches_subdomains =
Where should that go exactly?
In main.cf.
Wietse
I should have been more specific. Where in main.cf should it g
James Pifer:
> On 2/16/2023 9:21 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > Don't forget set an empty:
> >
> > parent_domain_matches_subdomains =
> >
>
> Where should that go exactly?
In main.cf.
Wietse
On 2/16/2023 9:21 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 08:23:00AM -0500, James Pifer wrote:
Anyone see anything wrong with it or have other suggestions?
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_client_access inline:{
{ 107.182.131 = REJECT This mail serv
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 08:23:00AM -0500, James Pifer wrote:
> Anyone see anything wrong with it or have other suggestions?
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> check_client_access inline:{
> { 107.182.131 = REJECT This mail server rejects mail
> from the 107.182.131.
On 2/8/2023 1:13 PM, James Pifer wrote:
On 2/8/2023 1:02 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Dnia 8.02.2023 o godz. 12:55:58 James Pifer pisze:
I would prefer to quarantine rather than reject, if I can figure out
how to do that. I would at least be able to look through them
periodically and see if someth
dnf -y install postfix-pcre
It was added later, but by then I had already converted to regex.
FYI: I was given the impression that pcre has better performance than regex in
postfix, if that is something relevant to you.
It was added later, but by then I had already converted to regex.
On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 11:34:49 -0500 post...@ptld.com wrote:
> > Since I'm using AlmaLinux, a derivative of RHEL, it does not have PCRE
> > because Redhat decided to remove it entirely from RHEL.
> > Thus, I had to convert all m
On 2/8/2023 1:02 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Dnia 8.02.2023 o godz. 12:55:58 James Pifer pisze:
I would prefer to quarantine rather than reject, if I can figure out
how to do that. I would at least be able to look through them
periodically and see if something is legit.
I suddenly started getting
Dnia 8.02.2023 o godz. 12:55:58 James Pifer pisze:
> I would prefer to quarantine rather than reject, if I can figure out
> how to do that. I would at least be able to look through them
> periodically and see if something is legit.
>
> I suddenly started getting these (.store,.shop, etc) a could
On 2/8/2023 12:37 PM, Rob McGee wrote:
On 2/8/2023 3:14 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 10:00:14AM +0200, mailm...@ionos.gr wrote:
/\.top$/ REJECT
/\.xyz$/ REJECT
/\.cam$/ REJECT
/\.fun$/ REJECT
/\.buzz$/ REJECT
/\.club$/ REJECT
/\.link$/ REJECT
/\.hinet\.net$/ REJECT
Why
On 2/8/2023 3:14 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 10:00:14AM +0200, mailm...@ionos.gr wrote:
/\.top$/ REJECT
/\.xyz$/ REJECT
/\.cam$/ REJECT
/\.fun$/ REJECT
/\.buzz$/ REJECT
/\.club$/ REJECT
/\.link$/ REJECT
/\.hinet\.net$/ REJECT
Why everyone feels they need regular express
Since I'm using AlmaLinux, a derivative of RHEL, it does not have PCRE because
Redhat decided to remove it entirely from RHEL.
Thus, I had to convert all my "pcre:" into "regexp:", like the above.
I'm using a similar flavor of RHEL and
dnf -y install postfix-pcre
worked for me. Is that p
On 2/8/2023 8:32 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
James Pifer:
The error was:
Feb? 8 07:38:11 mailserver postfix/smtpd[446839]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from mail-qt1-f179.google.com[209.85.160.179]: 451 4.3.5 Server
configuration error; from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=
The cause of the problem was logged IMME
Hi
Before add sender-acces works fine ?
Can you send output postconf -m ?
W dniu 8.02.2023 o 14:15, James Pifer pisze:
On 2/8/2023 4:14 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 10:00:14AM +0200, mailm...@ionos.gr wrote:
/\.top$/ REJECT
/\.xyz$/ REJECT
/\.cam$/ REJECT
/\.fun$/ REJEC
James Pifer:
> The error was:
> Feb? 8 07:38:11 mailserver postfix/smtpd[446839]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from mail-qt1-f179.google.com[209.85.160.179]: 451 4.3.5 Server
> configuration error; from=
> to= proto=ESMTP helo=
The cause of the problem was logged IMMEDIATELY BEFORE THAT LINE.
On 2/8/2023 4:14 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 10:00:14AM +0200, mailm...@ionos.gr wrote:
/\.top$/ REJECT
/\.xyz$/ REJECT
/\.cam$/ REJECT
/\.fun$/ REJECT
/\.buzz$/ REJECT
/\.club$/ REJECT
/\.link$/ REJECT
/\.hinet\.net$/ REJECT
Why everyone feels they need regular expressi
mailm...@ionos.gr:
> Here is how I do it:
>
> check_sender_access regexp:/etc/postfix/sender_domain_checks
>
> here are the (partial) contents of /etc/postfix/sender_domain_checks:
>
> /\.top$/ REJECT
> /\.xyz$/ REJECT
> /\.cam$/ REJECT
> /\.fun$/ REJECT
> /\.buzz$/ REJECT
> /\.club$/ REJECT
> /
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 10:00:14AM +0200, mailm...@ionos.gr wrote:
> /\.top$/ REJECT
> /\.xyz$/ REJECT
> /\.cam$/ REJECT
> /\.fun$/ REJECT
> /\.buzz$/ REJECT
> /\.club$/ REJECT
> /\.link$/ REJECT
> /\.hinet\.net$/ REJECT
Why everyone feels they need regular expressions for this is a mystery.
Hi
Please send info like:
postconf -m
Probably you dont have pcre
try postmap -q your_ask pcre:/etc/postfix/reject_domains
W dniu 7.02.2023 o 22:49, James Pifer pisze:
Hello all. I'm trying to block some TLDs and everything I try I'm
getting: 451 4.3.5 : Sender address rejected: Server
conf
Here is how I do it:
check_sender_access regexp:/etc/postfix/sender_domain_checks
here are the (partial) contents of /etc/postfix/sender_domain_checks:
/\.top$/ REJECT
/\.xyz$/ REJECT
/\.cam$/ REJECT
/\.fun$/ REJECT
/\.buzz$/ REJECT
/\.club$/ REJECT
/\.link$/ REJECT
/\.hinet\.net$/ REJECT
Sinc
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 04:02:13PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> > Hello all. I'm trying to block some TLDs and everything I try I'm
> > getting: 451 4.3.5 : Sender address rejected:
> > Server configuration error;
> >
>
> What is the error message logged before that?
>
> Does your postfix supp
On 2/7/2023 3:49 PM, James Pifer wrote:
Hello all. I'm trying to block some TLDs and everything I try I'm
getting: 451 4.3.5 : Sender address rejected:
Server configuration error;
What is the error message logged before that?
Does your postfix support the pcre map type?
Maybe try regex: in
> On Jun 26, 2018, at 1:15 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> No, it works substantially better in check_sender_access, and very poorly
>> in header_checks.
>
> It works very well for me, and has for years.
The regular expressions you posted are fragile, subject to easy false
posititves and should not
On Jun 26, 2018, at 09:10, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> No, it works substantially better in check_sender_access, and very poorly
> in header_checks.
It works very well for me, and has for years.
--
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
> On Jun 26, 2018, at 6:07 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> I use header checks:
>
> /.*\.example.top/ DUNNO
> /.*\.FriendwithJokeDoamin.xxx/ OK
> /.*\.(com|net|org|edu|gov|ca|mx|de|dk|fi|uk|us|tv|info|biz|eu|es|il|it|nl|name|jp|host|au|nz)$/
> DUNNO
> /.*\.*/ 550 Mail to or from this TLD is not allow
On 25 Jun 2018, at 14:45, Alex wrote:
> I have a check_sender_access restriction that blocks many TLDs like
> .red and .space. Problem is that we have one legitimate .red customer
> (what was he thinking?) that needs to send us mail. How can I allow
> this single domain?
I use header checks:
/.*
Alex:
> HI,
>
> I have a check_sender_access restriction that blocks many TLDs like
> .red and .space. Problem is that we have one legitimate .red customer
> (what was he thinking?) that needs to send us mail. How can I allow
> this single domain?
>
> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
> permit_
-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of pe...@ixp.jp
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 12:38 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Blocking TLDs
On Feb/19.15:36:11, Wolfe, Robert wrote:
> I get a LOT of emails from domains that have *.download and *.xyz
On 2016-02-20 Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> 1: REJECT tells the spammer "Hey, your spam got stuck in the spam
> filter. Wanna try again?". Better to DISCARD it so the spammer think
> they got the spam through, then they won't switch to a new domain.
>
> I don't think anyone ever will receive legitima
ous reasons.
>
>
>
> Från: Wolfe, Robert [mailto:robert.wo...@robertwolfe.org]
> Skickat: den 19 februari 2016 23:19
> Till: 'Sebastian Nielsen' ;
> postfix-users@postfix.org
> Ämne: RE: Blocking TLDs
>
>
>
> Just copy and passed the DISCARD contents into bann
Just copy and passed the DISCARD contents into banned_tlds?
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Nielsen
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 3:50 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: SV: Blocking TLDs
smtpd_sender_restriction
34 matches
Mail list logo
