Op 09-04-2024 om 12:57 schreef Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
virtual_alias_maps and alias_maps have slightly different capabilities
virtual_alias_maps
- is processed when mail is being received
- can be used to rewrite ANY destination mail address (including
non-local recipients)
Dnia 9.04.2024 o godz. 11:11:31 Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users pisze:
When I want to make an alias, I try this in /etc/aliases:
"al...@domain.nl": j...@domain.nl
But when I sent mail, I get a bounce with "user unknown".
When I do this in /etc/aliases:
alias: j...@domain.nl
This works fin
Op 09-04-2024 om 11:46 schreef Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users:
Dnia 9.04.2024 o godz. 11:11:31 Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users pisze:
When I want to make an alias, I try this in /etc/aliases:
"al...@domain.nl": j...@domain.nl
But when I sent mail, I get a bounce with "user unknown".
When
Dnia 9.04.2024 o godz. 11:11:31 Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users pisze:
> When I want to make an alias, I try this in /etc/aliases:
> "al...@domain.nl": j...@domain.nl
> But when I sent mail, I get a bounce with "user unknown".
>
> When I do this in /etc/aliases:
> alias: j...@domain.nl
> Th
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:49:18AM +0800, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> > You can create virtual(5) aliases for any address you want, with
> > any syntactically valid rewrite target(s) of your choice.
> >
> > Neither the LHS nor the RHS addresses need be in domains under your
> > control. Th
On 2023-04-10 23:10, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 04:19:28PM +0800, tom--- via Postfix-users
wrote:
And a real user t...@myposts.ovh which exists in dovecot-users table.
After then, can I create aliases in virtual_alias_maps like follows?
al...@myposts.ovh
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 04:19:28PM +0800, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> And a real user t...@myposts.ovh which exists in dovecot-users table.
>
> After then, can I create aliases in virtual_alias_maps like follows?
>
> al...@myposts.ovh t...@myposts.ovh
> b...@myposts.ovh t...@myposts.ovh
On 10.04.23 16:19, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote:
Maybe I am not clear about virtual_mailbox_domains and
virtual_alias_domains.
Say I have this mailbox domain: myposts.ovh
And a real user t...@myposts.ovh which exists in dovecot-users table.
After then, can I create aliases in virtual_alias_ma
On 12/20/2019 4:56 PM, Gerben Wierda wrote:
On 20 Dec 2019, at 22:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk>> wrote:
On 20.12.19 17:25, Gerben Wierda wrote:
I am trying to understand how my aliases/virtual_users/etc interact.
postfix setup has virtual domains and virtual users, bu
> On 20 Dec 2019, at 22:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 20.12.19 17:25, Gerben Wierda wrote:
>> I am trying to understand how my aliases/virtual_users/etc interact.
>>
>> postfix setup has virtual domains and virtual users, but all users (also
>> those from different domains) are loca
On 20.12.19 17:25, Gerben Wierda wrote:
I am trying to understand how my aliases/virtual_users/etc interact.
postfix setup has virtual domains and virtual users, but all users (also those
from different domains) are local dovecot IMAP mailboxes (“separate domains,
unix system accounts”)
main.
On Apr 9, 2014, at 9:17 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 02:38:32AM +, Rob Tanner wrote:
>
>> The policyd daemon is a perfect tool for setting quotas (i.e., number
>> of message per hour, day, etc). The problem is that we depend
>> heavily of Postfix's extraordinary abi
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 02:38:32AM +, Rob Tanner wrote:
> The policyd daemon is a perfect tool for setting quotas (i.e., number
> of message per hour, day, etc). The problem is that we depend
> heavily of Postfix's extraordinary ability to do LDAP based aliasing
> of groups and when it each r
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:41:28AM -0700, Thufir wrote:
> Is the problem that mailmain isn't picking up the aliases?
> Specifically, alias_maps and alias_database, that there's a mismatch?
> If so, I'm not spotting it.
>
>
>
> root@dur:~#
> root@dur:~# tail /var/log/mail.log
snip
> Aug 28 08:29:
On 2012-01-03 04:33, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On 1/2/12 7:08 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 01/02/2012 02:00 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I have a 'border' postfix MTA that doesn't host any mailboxes, indeed it
doesn't even know what the valid usernames are for the domain.
It merely serves to
On 1/3/12 12:36 AM, Lorens Kockum wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 06:00:46PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> I have a 'border' postfix MTA that doesn't host any mailboxes, indeed it
>> doesn't even know what the valid usernames are for the domain.
>>
>> It merely serves to check messages for
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 06:00:46PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> I have a 'border' postfix MTA that doesn't host any mailboxes, indeed it
> doesn't even know what the valid usernames are for the domain.
>
> It merely serves to check messages for viruses, and block DoS attacks.
>
> As such,
On 1/2/12 7:08 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 01/02/2012 02:00 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> I have a 'border' postfix MTA that doesn't host any mailboxes, indeed it
>> doesn't even know what the valid usernames are for the domain.
>>
>> It merely serves to check messages for viruses, and block
On 01/02/2012 02:00 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I have a 'border' postfix MTA that doesn't host any mailboxes, indeed it
doesn't even know what the valid usernames are for the domain.
It merely serves to check messages for viruses, and block DoS attacks.
As such, I need it to perform aliasin
Philip Prindeville:
> As such, I need it to perform aliasing *only* on messages generated
> locally by system services, such as 'cron'.
Both alias_maps and virtual_alias_maps are destination properties,
not origin properties. Adding context-dependencies to one MTA
configuration makes it harder to
You've launched the command 'newaliases' (or equivalent) after you edited
/etc/aliases, did you?
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter
wrote:
> * peng...@sepserver.net :
> > I have in my /etc/aliases the text "postmaster: root". I sent an email to
> > postmas...@mydomain.com. I ch
* peng...@sepserver.net :
> I have in my /etc/aliases the text "postmaster: root". I sent an email to
> postmas...@mydomain.com. I checked the log files of the server but do not
> see any indication of any email being received. Would there be a log of
> mail reveived in mail.log? I checked /root/Ma
On 2011-11-19 00:20, ml wrote:
Le 18.11.2011 23:21, Wietse Venema a écrit :
peng...@sepserver.net:
I have in my /etc/aliases the text "postmaster: root". I sent an
email to
postmas...@mydomain.com. I checked the log files of the server but
do not
see any indication of any email being received
Le 18.11.2011 23:21, Wietse Venema a écrit :
peng...@sepserver.net:
I have in my /etc/aliases the text "postmaster: root". I sent an
email to
postmas...@mydomain.com. I checked the log files of the server but
do not
see any indication of any email being received. Would there be a log
of
All
peng...@sepserver.net:
> I have in my /etc/aliases the text "postmaster: root". I sent an email to
> postmas...@mydomain.com. I checked the log files of the server but do not
> see any indication of any email being received. Would there be a log of
All delivery attempts are logged, local and remot
* peng...@sepserver.net :
> I have in my /etc/aliases the text "postmaster: root". I sent an email to
> postmas...@mydomain.com. I checked the log files of the server but do not
> see any indication of any email being received.
Show the logs please
> Would there be a log of mail reveived in mail.
* Glenn English :
> I hope I just dodged a bullet -- my aliases file 'disappeared' somehow.
> And it was empty in all the backups.
>
> But I found a 12K aliases.db; I assume this contains the translated
> aliases data. Is there a way to convert this to a plain aliases file?
postalias -s hash:ali
On 1/31/2011 5:26 PM, Dan wrote:
I have following snippet config:
#mysql /etc/aliases
virtual_alias_maps = mysql:$config_directory/mysql_aliases.cf
#no sense in extra database calls for this
#virtual_uid_maps = mysql:$config_directory/mysql_uids.cf
#virtual_gid_maps = mysql:$config_directory/m
Thanks a lot for your help !
Le 08/10/2010 17:47, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:15:46AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
transport_maps = mapping from example.com to smtp:mailhub.example.com
relay_domains = example.com
virtual_alias_map
OK understood ! Thanks for your help :-)
Le 08/10/2010 17:15, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Frank Bonnet:
I would like to use LDAP ( OpenLDAP ) aliases from our MX server
in order to forward emails to the internal mailhub.
The MX use the transport utility to forward emails to the mailhub
and does no
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:50:42PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Victor Duchovni:
> > > I avoid the need for such empty relay tables, by making all my
> > > externally-facing domains (the domains in which users get their
> > > primary email addresses) be virtual alias domain
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:50:42PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > I avoid the need for such empty relay tables, by making all my
> > externally-facing domains (the domains in which users get their
> > primary email addresses) be virtual alias domains. All internal
> > delivery
Victor Duchovni:
> I avoid the need for such empty relay tables, by making all my
> externally-facing domains (the domains in which users get their
> primary email addresses) be virtual alias domains. All internal
> delivery is to "mailbox" domains that are the result of virtual
> alias rewrites:
>
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:15:46AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> > > transport_maps = mapping from example.com to smtp:mailhub.example.com
> > > relay_domains = example.com
> > > virtual_alias_maps =
> > > mappings from external-u...@example.com to inte
Frank Bonnet:
> I would like to use LDAP ( OpenLDAP ) aliases from our MX server
> in order to forward emails to the internal mailhub.
>
> The MX use the transport utility to forward emails to the mailhub
> and does not perform local deliveries.
Wietse:
> > In that case you should be able to repla
Thank you !
On 10/08/2010 03:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Frank Bonnet:
Hello
I would like to use LDAP ( OpenLDAP ) aliases from our MX server
in order to forward emails to the internal mailhub.
The MX use the transport utility to forward emails to the mailhub
and does not perform local de
virtual_alias_maps = proxy:ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-alias.cf
virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-domain.cf
virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-mailbox1.cf
where
/etc/postfix/ldap-alias.cf:
server_host = ldaphost.mydomain.com
server_port = 389
search_base = ou=
Frank Bonnet:
> Hello
>
> I would like to use LDAP ( OpenLDAP ) aliases from our MX server
> in order to forward emails to the internal mailhub.
>
> The MX use the transport utility to forward emails to the mailhub
> and does not perform local deliveries.
In that case you should be able to rep
On Oct 8, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would like to use LDAP ( OpenLDAP ) aliases from our MX server
> in order to forward emails to the internal mailhub.
>
> The MX use the transport utility to forward emails to the mailhub
> and does not perform local deliveries.
>
>
Ronan REYNAUD:
> I thought I must add include to
> allow_mail_to_files = alias,forward,include
> in main.cf to use include in the aliases
As documented, the allow_mail_to_files feature says whether Postfix
can deliver mail to "external" files. The syntax for delivering
to file is "/file/name".
Le Sunday 22 November 2009 15:39:33 Wietse Venema, vous avez écrit :
> With allow_mail_to_files, Postfix APPENDS mail to a local file.
>
> > But I'd like to know if there's a limit to the number of mail
> > addresses in this file ? (...)
>
> APPENDing is not READing.
I think I misunderstood someth
Ronan REYNAUD:
> hello
>
> I'm using a file in aliases (with "allow_mail_to_files" set)
> and it's currently working perfectly.
With allow_mail_to_files, Postfix APPENDS mail to a local file.
> But I'd like to know if there's a limit to the number of mail
> addresses in this file ? (i'll need ab
Sahil,
Thank you so much. It seems to be working after I removed the $. Once
again, thanks for your time and patience.
Charles
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, c cc wrote:
>
>> mydestination = $myhostname, localhost, $mydomain,
>> localhost.$mydomain,
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, c cc wrote:
> mydestination = $myhostname, localhost, $mydomain,
> localhost.$mydomain, $ns1.example.org, localhost.localdomain,
> localhost.$ns1.example.org
> mydomain = example.org
> myhostname = ns1.example.org
> myorigin = $ns1.example.org
What's with all these '$ns1' ref
Sahil,
Thanks--here are the files.
Chralres
/var/log $postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
html_directory = no
inet_interfaces = all
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, c cc wrote:
> Thank you. Here is the main part of the aliase file.
Also show us the output of 'postconf -n' and some un-modified sections from
your maillog that display the ENTIRE error.
--
Sahil Tandon
Sahil,
Thank you. Here is the main part of the aliase file.
Charles
# Aliases in this file will NOT be expanded in the header from
# Mail, but WILL be visible over networks or from /bin/mail.
#
# >> The program "newaliases" must be run after
# >> NOTE >> this file
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, c cc wrote:
> I just setup the postfix server and everything works fine except the
> aliases. Whenever I send to an aliases email, I got the following
> error message back. Some how, postfix adds an (.) period before the
> domain. Does anyone know how can I remove the (dot)
Postfix a écrit :
> Thanks,
> Putting the fqn in the virtual map:
> someem...@mydomain.comtestal...@fqdn.of.host
>
> worked. I didn't see this in the online docs, but I may have missed it.
>
Addresses with a domain part get a @$myorigin added. see the ADDRESS
REWRITE README or the entry for
Peter Macko a écrit :
> I have two mailservers behind a firewall and they are on the same subnet
> e.g.
> A: @test.sk 192.168.1.5
> B: @test.eu 192.168.1.6
>
> MX records in DNS on internet are e.g.
> A: @test.sk 194.1.1.5
> B: @test.eu 194.1.1.6
>
> On the A server I have setup aliases file to
Thanks,
Putting the fqn in the virtual map:
someem...@mydomain.comtestal...@fqdn.of.host
worked. I didn't see this in the online docs, but I may have missed it.
- Original Message -
From: "Barney Desmond"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: A
2009/7/24 Postfix :
> I have an alias setup
> testalias: ema...@mydomain.com, ema...@mydomain.com
>
> I also use virtual mappings, so I have a line like this:
> someem...@mydomain.com testalias
That sounds about right.
> However, when I email someem...@mydomain.com, it gets bounced back as:
>
KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
> Would some kind soul tell me what i am missing/mucking up here.
> I haven an almost bog standard aliases file in /etc the only changes I
> have made are (and yes I ran newaliases against it and the aliases.db
> looks OK) -
>
> root: postmaster+exam...@exam
sorry I screwed up, the xxx.txt attachment is my postconf -n output., I
should have made sure was correctly named.
JLA
On Jan 29, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Dave wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Evan Platt
wrote:
At 10:37 PM 1/28/2009, you wrote:
What's with you guys on this list who have the answers yet are just
handing out clues one by one and making me guess about the answer
over the course of seve
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Evan Platt wrote:
> At 10:37 PM 1/28/2009, you wrote:
>
> What's with you guys on this list who have the answers yet are just
>> handing out clues one by one and making me guess about the answer over the
>> course of several email exchanges? Fortunately, there a
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Dave:
> > What's with you guys on this list who have the answers yet are just
> handing
> > out clues one by one and making me guess about the answer over the course
> of
> > several email exchanges? Fortunately, there are some guys on this
Dave wrote, at 01/29/2009 01:37 AM:
> What's with you guys on this list who have the answers yet are just
> handing out clues one by one and making me guess about the answer over
> the course of several email exchanges?
You'll find that they are often being considerate, and are trying to
avoid gi
Dave:
> What's with you guys on this list who have the answers yet are just handing
> out clues one by one and making me guess about the answer over the course of
> several email exchanges? Fortunately, there are some guys on this list that
> don't engage in those psychological games and I have gr
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:24:15AM -0500, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> Case in point, the regex solution I suggested earlier is not the best
> way to return a single result for all inputs
Important limitation, generally "static" is limited to a result that
contains no white-space or "," characters. Not b
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 01:37:01AM -0500, Dave wrote:
>
>> > No not "using generic", rather using a table that returns a fixed output
>> > regardless of the input. The list of supported tables is still in the
>> > same place, and looking th
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 01:37:01AM -0500, Dave wrote:
> > No not "using generic", rather using a table that returns a fixed output
> > regardless of the input. The list of supported tables is still in the
> > same place, and looking through it top to bottom will quickly expose
> > the right table
At 10:37 PM 1/28/2009, you wrote:
What's with you guys on this list who have the answers yet are just
handing out clues one by one and making me guess about the answer
over the course of several email exchanges? Fortunately, there are
some guys on this list that don't engage in those psycholo
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:48:14AM -0500, Dave wrote:
>
> > > Ignoring regexp table syntax problems for the moment, this is a very
> > > degenerate regexp table, the input is completely ignored, and a fi
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:48:14AM -0500, Dave wrote:
> > Ignoring regexp table syntax problems for the moment, this is a very
> > degenerate regexp table, the input is completely ignored, and a fixed
> > output is produced. Postfix has a *much* simpler table type for this case,
> > listed in http
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:39:53PM -0500, Dave wrote:
>
> > I would want the table entry would be:
> > .* m...@example.com
>
> Ignoring regexp table syntax problems for the moment, this is a very
> de
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:39:53PM -0500, Dave wrote:
> I would want the table entry would be:
> .* m...@example.com
Ignoring regexp table syntax problems for the moment, this is a very
degenerate regexp table, the input is completely ignored, and a fixed
output is produced. Postfix has a *much
--Original Message Text---
From: Dave
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:39:53 -0500
==
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Aaron Wolfe
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Dave wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:04:48PM -0500, Da
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Dave wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Dave wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Victor Duchovni
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:04:48PM -0500, Dave wrot
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Dave wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Victor Duchovni
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:04:48PM -0500, Dave wrote:
> >>
> >> > > Google is full of noise. Try:
> >> > >
> >> >
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Dave wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:04:48PM -0500, Dave wrote:
>>
>> > > Google is full of noise. Try:
>> > >
>> > >http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
>> > >http://www.postfix.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:04:48PM -0500, Dave wrote:
>
> > > Google is full of noise. Try:
> > >
> > >http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
> > >http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_READ
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:04:48PM -0500, Dave wrote:
> > Google is full of noise. Try:
> >
> >http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
> >http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html
> >http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#generic
> >http://www.postfix.org
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:47:28PM -0500, Dave wrote:
>
> > > When you post to this list, you are taking up the time of many experts
> > > (and some amateurs like myself :). Please treat this resource w
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:47:28PM -0500, Dave wrote:
> > When you post to this list, you are taking up the time of many experts
> > (and some amateurs like myself :). Please treat this resource with
> > the respect that it deserves. These same experts have taken the time
> > to create excellent
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Dave wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net)
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net)
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 28,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net)
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net)
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Dave wrote:
> >>>
> >>> With my setup, Postf
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net)
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net)
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Dave wrote:
>>>
>>> With my setup, Postfix send an email from my local user account ("user")
>>> as u...@example.com
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Dave (DavesTechShop.net) <
d...@davestechshop.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Dave wrote:
>
>> With my setup, Postfix send an email from my local user account ("user")
>> as u...@example.com. Example.com is a Google apps domain.
>> I would like
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Dave wrote:
> With my setup, Postfix send an email from my local user account ("user") as
> u...@example.com. Example.com is a Google apps domain.
> I would like the email to go out as another name: anewn...@example.com.
> (where "anewname" matches my gmail user a
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 11:31:32AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Many thanks for the help mouss, and my apologies for my hiatus...
>
> As per my email, I am using NIS and DBM aliases foor all of my users and
> aliases for them.
>
> What I must do is forward *ALL* email for say example.ne
stfix.org
> Subject: Re: Aliases Lookups, not found? Then Smarthost
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello All;
> >
> > I currently have the following setup in my main.cf:
> >
> > alias_maps = dbm:/etc/postfix/aliases, nis:mail.aliases
> >
> > I&
** At 10:03 -0400 on 08/26/2008, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Vince Sabio wrote:
This morning, I added a new entry to the alias table, and ran
newaliases without error. I also did a "postfix reload". But the alias
is not being recognized; mail sent to the alias (from the localhost)
>
Vince Sabio wrote:
> I have an 'old' alias file in /etc/aliases (linked to
> /etc/mail/aliases) that seems to be working fine; I haven't changed it
> in years. Since that time, I have upgraded to postfix 2.5.1.
>
> This morning, I added a new entry to the alias table, and ran
> newaliases without e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you mouss!
please do not top post.
I've neglected to inform that I am already using transports:
if you keep "neglicting", don't be surprised if people neglect your
posts ;-p
when asking for help, it is important to give a precise description of
your situa
Allowing the exchange
server figure out if it is a valid user or not? Can this be done for say 12
domains?
Thanks again,
.vp
> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:44:00 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Aliases Lookups, not found? Then Smarthost
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All;
I currently have the following setup in my main.cf:
alias_maps = dbm:/etc/postfix/aliases, nis:mail.aliases
I've also enabled myself to receive email for about 15 domains.
Everything works just fine, but because of some new domains I am now charged
with ma
87 matches
Mail list logo
