Randy wrote:
It appears that exchange uses some other criteria to
check sender domain or that it does additional checks and simply
rejects with that message. I do realize that I could set up something
where we accept the mail to these domains, scan it then drop the email
if it is tagged as sp
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Randy put forth on 3/24/2010 3:55 PM:
dig -x 208.43.143.111
;; ANSWER SECTION:
111.143.43.208.in-addr.arpa. 3600 INPTR
208.43.143.111-static.reverse.softlayer.com.
Your problem isn't the Exchange server per se. Your problem is that you're
forwarding spam
Randy put forth on 3/24/2010 3:55 PM:
> dig -x 208.43.143.111
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> 111.143.43.208.in-addr.arpa. 3600 INPTR
> 208.43.143.111-static.reverse.softlayer.com.
Your problem isn't the Exchange server per se. Your problem is that you're
forwarding spam to it, and its anti-spam
duyz
仍然们
ent from my HTC
-Original Message噢
From: Wietse Venema 万维网
Sent: Thursday, 25 March 2010 6:29 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Relaying and backskatter problem
Sean Reifschneider:
> On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
> > EX:
> > : Sender address rejected: Domai
Wietse Venema wrote:
Sean Reifschneider:
On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
EX:
: Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in
reply to RCPT TO command))
I'd be tempted to set up a milter or policy filter that for each rcpt
would connect to the Exchange server (assuming that'
Sean Reifschneider:
> On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
> > EX:
> > : Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in
> > reply to RCPT TO command))
>
> I'd be tempted to set up a milter or policy filter that for each rcpt
> would connect to the Exchange server (assuming that's where it's destine
On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote:
> EX:
> : Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in
> reply to RCPT TO command))
I'd be tempted to set up a milter or policy filter that for each rcpt
would connect to the Exchange server (assuming that's where it's destined)
and see if that server will acc
