Re: Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to spammer

2017-07-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 30.07.17 10:21, techlist06 wrote: Subject: Re: Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to spammer ...are you receiving spam messages with NOTIFY=SUCCESS? (I don't see bounce of this message in logs) Instead of trying to decipher one with a problem, can someone che

Re: Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to spammer

2017-07-30 Thread techlist06
0.04, delays=0.01/0.03/0/0, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to mailbox) # qmgr removes the filtered message received 230F69E7 ? Jul 30 11:18:13 mail1 postfix/qmgr[3285]: 230F69E7: removed END -- View this message in context: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/RE-Deciphering-mai

Re: Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to spammer

2017-07-28 Thread techlist06
l have a better idea hopefully. -- View this message in context: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/RE-Deciphering-maillog-transaction-that-resulted-in-reply-to-spammer-tp91584p91593.html Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to spammer

2017-07-28 Thread techlist06
ix/smtp[11091]: E58673D02: to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=0.66, delays=0.49/0.01/0.01/0.15, dsn=2.5.0, status=sent (250 2.5.0 Ok, id=05520-17, BOUNCE) ## -- View this message in context: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/RE-Deciphering-maillog-transaction-that-

Re: Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to spammer

2017-07-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 06:06:27PM -0500, Scott Techlist wrote: > amavis[5520]: (05520-17) Blocked BAD-HEADER-0 {BouncedInbound,Quarantined}, Here is the message result. "Bounced" is the relevant part. Fix %final_destiny_by_ccat, do it now. Bastian -- Each kiss is as the first.

Re: Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to spammer

2017-07-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Scott Techlist: > I was hoping someone would help me with a tour of the log steps of what's > handing off to what along the way. I get the jist of what's happening, but > I'm trying to learn the details. Sorry, that is an unreasonable request. Your logging was word-wrapped into one pile of text,

RE: Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to spammer

2017-07-27 Thread Scott Techlist
>Did you configure your content filter to send a bounce message? Not intentionally. >Jul 26 19:05:57 mail1 postfix/smtpd[11093]: 67FB13910: >client=localhost[127.0.0.1] > >Jul 26 19:05:57 mail1 postfix/cleanup[11094]: 67FB13910: >message-id= > >That is not a Postfix-generated message ID.

Re: Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to spammer

2017-07-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Did you configure your content filter to send a bounce message? Jul 26 19:05:57 mail1 postfix/smtpd[11093]: 67FB13910: client=localhost[127.0.0.1] Jul 26 19:05:57 mail1 postfix/cleanup[11094]: 67FB13910: message-id= That is not a Postfix-generated message ID. Is that from your content fi